Ich habe ein YouTube-Video darüber gemacht, welche Schauspieler am meisten Nettogewinn bringen, normiert nach Genre, Regisseur, Budget usw.
Dies ist eine der Visualisierungen, die ich ziemlich cool fand.
Die Daten stammen aus nichtkommerziellen IMDb-Datensätzen. Ich habe nach allen als „Film“ gekennzeichneten Filmen gefiltert und die Bewertungen jedes einzelnen aufgezeichnet.
https://developer.imdb.com/non-commercial-datasets/
Dies ist die zweite Aufnahme! Aufgrund des Feedbacks habe ich alle Beschriftungen nach links verschoben und den Abstand für mobile Benutzer etwas geändert.
Für die grafische Generierung wurde Manim (Python) verwendet. IMDb war die einzige Datenquelle. Alles OK
Von RightOfTheBellVideos
22 Kommentare
the documentary and music genres having those weird multi-modal peaks is kinda fascinating, never seen it visualized like this before
It’s funny that I don’t think you can really get a sense of quality from this despite some genres having higher ratings. Something tells me the people who go to see a biographical movie are already fans of that person and more likely to rate any movie about them higher.
You can even sort of see that in other genres like sport, history, music, etc. Then you have the highest genre where that doesn’t apply being “war” in which you run into the problem of the people likely to watch a war movie are just fans of war movies. I’d bet, if you could measure it, that this chart would have a positive correlation between genre scores and genre fanaticism. Hence why the much more broad genres of horror, sci-fi, thriller, mystery, etc are the ones taking up the lowest averages despite being the vast majority of famous movies
This is life affirming. I never trust high marks on biography, history, and sports movies. If it’s “based” on real events it gets arbitrary high marks for being educational I guess? Fiction and science fiction are even more educational I argue.
Seems like the more unscripted, reality based stuff has the most diverse yet definite ratings which is… oddly specific.
Intrigued that so many people are going on to IMDb to rate XXX films. Are they doing it based on personal preferences and how useful it was, or does the mise en scene get considered?
Always bothers me how Animation is a genre. Let’s make IMAX a genre too while we’re at it.
From a purely „data is beautiful“-perspective, categories with less than, say, 200 titles should be removed due to low sample size. They create graphs that look more interesting than they are.
This is a beautiful representation of the [Central Limit Theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_limit_theorem). The more titles you have, the more the curve looks like a Gaussian
I would prefer it if the x-axis would be aligned with the bottom of the label text.
Apart from that, nice work 🙂
A movie „genre“ with three qualifying instances, or really, less than a hundred, _is probably not a genre._
And there are _way_ more than 875 films noir as long as you (sensibly) count movies that aren’t black and white.
Kinda unfortunate that Amazon decides who gets to rate movies these days. I’m sure that doesn’t interface with their decision to try their hand at movies and TV, and doesn’t further poison the already laughable rating system that was IMDb.
Horror movies are always complete shit I swear. Been some good ones this year but man.
What is a game show movie and why are there 3 of them
Horror being dead last makes perfect sense. I’ll watch an absolute dumpster fire of a movie, rate it a 3/10, and then immediately tell my friends they need to see it.
I’m more hung up on the adult section though. Who is logging onto IMDb to leave honest, nuanced reviews of adult movies?
Are they ordered by mean? Would be nice to show the mean (or quartiles) as well.
That’s why a 6 rated horror movie is really not indicative of its quality. I’ve seen horror movies rated 6.5 and the rating really didn’t reflect its quality.
As a society we are fairly certain how we all feel about westerns.
I love how this info-G captures a rich dept of information and the colonization is fantastic.
Nice, I think this one will get much more discussion on the actual content now, or at least a more productive variety of the critiques.
the horror distribution being skewed so low is honestly hilarious but also makes total sense. like 90% of horror movies are absolute garbage and we all know it but we watch them anyway lol
It’s funny because I’ve subconsciously learned this workout the data
Movies with reality / documentary / news get a bump.
Drama or action over 8 are good.
Sci fi or horror over 7 are good
Aside: I honestly would have expected horror and sci fi to have a bimodal curve. A group at very bad and a group at fairly good
What are the three game show movies?
Bro sort by number of titles descending, not by increasing rating trend. First thing to look at is how many results the ratings are based on, which is tough when they are out of order.