Der Schütze aus Montreal hinterließ ein Manifest mit gewalttätiger Rhetorik, das sich gegen Frauen, Polizisten und andere richtete
https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/article/montreal-shooter-left-behind-manifesto-containing-violent-rhetoric-directed-at-women-police-others/
19 Kommentare
>The manifesto also makes numerous disparaging remarks about the bourgeois social class – a reference to those who are more wealthy or privileged – as well as various types of people he views as swindlers, including proponents of Christianity and cryptocurrency. It also attributes blame for increased loneliness in young men to video games and pornography, while asserting the ranks of likeminded individuals are growing.
…The document also details what the gunman viewed as specific targets that, in his estimation, were deserving of dire consequences, including major real estate brokerages, private equity firms, supporters of Zionism, health insurance CEOs, pick up artists, plastic surgeons and those profiting from mass immigration.
‚health insurance CEO’s‘. Huh.
As I said in another thread:
Guys – just finished reading the whole thing – basically every headline I’ve seen (including this one) mischaracterizes the ‘manifesto’
To be clear – this is not endorsing what this guy is saying – I shouldn’t have to say that but you know how Reddit comment readers are.
The shortest and most concise description I can give is that he blames the bourgeoisie class for creating a ‘hypergamy state’ which is bad for the ‘common male’.
He specifically says not to attack random women, and repeatedly says they are not really to blame, but the class that created the current society is. He also specifically says police are not his targets and doesn’t advocate for attacking them – so I don’t know why this is in the headline.
In his call to action, his ‘class A targets’ are the ‘bourgeoisie class’ like real estate CEOs, owners of media conglomerates, owners of social media and pornography, lobbyists and some politicians, and others he blames for creating the current ‘hypergamy’ society.
Despite some media reporting, he barely mentions Jews at all, and certainly doesn’t blame them – in fact there’s a lengthy footnote where he says that yes many jews are part of this class but that’s beside the point, and many Jews are not. He is mildly critical of Israel, off-handedly referring to it as a tool for capitalism etc.
Regarding whether he’s a Marxist or socialist or not – hard to say – he stays relatively focussed, he uses lots of related language like bourgeoisie and criticizes capitalism and etc while off-handed praising communist countries, but never really declares himself as one.
Addition:
I’m no fan of rebel media but their website is where I’ve read this. I haven’t seen it or any substantive clips posted on any normal media sites, and I’m convinced many of the authors haven’t actually read it since they basically all seem to mischaracterize some points and inflate the emphasis on others. To be fair it is like over 100 pages and the first 30 or so pages are an absolute mess but like cmon man it’s your job you’re a journalist.
I hope this shooter is never identified.
Just protest like the rest of us.
[deleted]
Are we going to paint all men with the brush of this guy like this sub does with immigrants?
Praises North Korea. Should have done himself a favour and just went to South Korea and crossed into North Korea and stay there
Also seems like based on the rambling nature of the manifesto (and ample use of “-“) that he probably used AI to help write it, which is a pretty on the nose 2026 development
He’s an Authoritarian leftist incel. But the media will move Heaven and earth to omit the part about leftism when reporting it.
The following is the full manifesto for anyone interested:
[https://files.elfsightcdn.com/eafe4a4d-3436-495d-b748-5bdce62d911d/2989cf8c-9611-40ef-9b6b-330f447dcff8/Manifesto_of_June_22nd-watermarked-rebel.pdf](https://files.elfsightcdn.com/eafe4a4d-3436-495d-b748-5bdce62d911d/2989cf8c-9611-40ef-9b6b-330f447dcff8/Manifesto_of_June_22nd-watermarked-rebel.pdf)
His animosity and violent rhetoric was towards the „Bourgeois“ not woman:
„The answer to the question ‘Is terror moral?’ is both yes, and no. The same may be said as to the
question of ‘Is terror effective?’.
If the terror in question is that of the last few decades, perpetrated by Islamists and mentally insane
rightists against masses of helpless and innocent people, then the answer is no. Such attacks are indeed not
only ineffective and immoral, but they are also despicable and cowardly.
Our terror is not like that. We do not launch attacks against harmless old folks in churches and
supermarkets, nor do we blow up concerts and festivals; for our war is not against the masses.
We are fighting against a different, and much more exclusive and inaccessible crowd; that is, those
who themselves are most responsible for the degrading conditions of contemporary life, and not those who,
like us, are suffering from such conditions.
In a word, we war against the big, against the strong, and against the powerful. They have grown
too much, and it is time that we cut them down.
Mr. Bourgeois – though he is much stronger than we are – is not immortal.“
Pg 82
So you’re telling me a communist incel from Alberta drove to Montreal and killed a cop with the ww2 era rifle that the Canadian government has been wanting to ban for decades, in what many „news“ outlets are calling a „jewish neighborhood“.
I dont think this was a psyop but I do think that csis is dancing in their chairs right now.
Call it what it is: terrorism against women
It’s almost as if the new media has a bias they are unable, or unwilling, to see beyond. That headline is the opposite of what he wrote according to the synopsis u/the_normal_person gave and is apparently available at rebel news.
I’m not niave enough to think the news was ever unbiased. There is no such thing as unbiased, but for decades journalism schools taught that the news was supposed to be just the facts and nothing but the facts. Do they no longer teach that? I think saying they don’t even try any more is letting go them off easy. It’s like they actively work to obscure the facts in favour of a narrative. I am pretty used to checking multiple angles to a story but that used to mean reading both the CBC, The National Post and maybe the Toronto Star. Now it means being your own reporter and reading court filings, manifesto, finding cell phone videos posted by randos on YouTube or X, and hoping you aren’t missing something important.
Wonder what his Reddit handle was
I never read manifestos and I wish the general public and news didn’t either.. it’s just a bunch of drivel opinion pieces slapped together by an unhinged person.. no different than opinions on Reddit except the guy killed someone so now people pay attention, it’s essentially rewarding the behavior.
This dude’s schizo writing is kinda fascinating.
He’s a sex communist who believes that capitalism has created the hypergamy state and that instating the tenets of Marxism and abolition of private property will basically make women stop flocking to wealthy or powerful men, and essentially is advocating for redistribution of wealth and women are wealth.
I don’t think I’ve ever see sex commie as a terrorist type before. The van guy was like a screeching Pepe meme but this guy is more like Uncle Ted in that he identifies a lot of real problems with society but then his solution is violent terrorist action.
What’s insane is it’s theoretically possible to make a software that reliably identifies the location of all police officers 24/7, like a Flock/Palantir stack but open source and accessible to everyone. This includes unmarked, plainclothes, undercover, etc.
He was probably a regular on this sub and based on the number of people defending him here.