Here on Earth, centuries of accumulated engineering knowhow, hard-learned lessons, and societal evolution have shaped a robust framework of building standards that govern how we build and maintain buildings today.
I suspect that any lunar building will be as safe as they can possibly build it.
Soup-a-doopah on
This is a pretty obvious answer: yes.
Engineers have created unique building codes for every climate/elevation/topography combination on this planet.
Of course engineering is going to form codes around building in a place with completely different physics than earth. No brainer
net_junkey on
„sustained presence“ seems like the key phrase. As soon as talk moves to infrastructure it would be wise to create international standards. Power grid, waste disposal, water and oxygen systems. Standardized parts will save a lot of time and resources.
Javamac8 on
This is an interesting conversation because we’re kind of at the crossroads of „*slap a tin can on a bomb*“ and a „*spared no expense*“ perspective on space. The shuttles were a nice halfway point, but the ISS is still a soup can basically. I’m excited to see how the first permanent structures on ground will turn out when they finally get built.
tweedleduh on
For the love of god can we keep the stupid rules to our own planet please? – I get humanity’s intentions at least are mostly good, but can we all at least agree that the only things rules have ever done is limit one people’s use for some other persons benefit… there has never been an example of a rule that I’ve ever seen where everyone benefits.
Here’s a rule, leave it alone. Thank you for coming to my TED talk
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
6 Kommentare
From the article
Here on Earth, centuries of accumulated engineering knowhow, hard-learned lessons, and societal evolution have shaped a robust framework of building standards that govern how we build and maintain buildings today.
But now, as humanity prepares to put in place a [„sustained presence“ on the moon](https://www.space.com/astronomy/moon/artemis-moon-base-will-cover-hundreds-of-square-miles-with-hopping-drones-and-new-lunar-rovers-nasa-says), how do we guarantee the safety and integrity of structures built in an environment for which no such tradition exists?
At the 26th Space Resources Roundtable held June 2-5 on the campus of the Colorado School of Mines, one expert says what’s needed is a lunar building code, the development of specific design criteria for [the moon](https://www.space.com/55-earths-moon-formation-composition-and-orbit.html).
I suspect that any lunar building will be as safe as they can possibly build it.
This is a pretty obvious answer: yes.
Engineers have created unique building codes for every climate/elevation/topography combination on this planet.
Of course engineering is going to form codes around building in a place with completely different physics than earth. No brainer
„sustained presence“ seems like the key phrase. As soon as talk moves to infrastructure it would be wise to create international standards. Power grid, waste disposal, water and oxygen systems. Standardized parts will save a lot of time and resources.
This is an interesting conversation because we’re kind of at the crossroads of „*slap a tin can on a bomb*“ and a „*spared no expense*“ perspective on space. The shuttles were a nice halfway point, but the ISS is still a soup can basically. I’m excited to see how the first permanent structures on ground will turn out when they finally get built.
For the love of god can we keep the stupid rules to our own planet please? – I get humanity’s intentions at least are mostly good, but can we all at least agree that the only things rules have ever done is limit one people’s use for some other persons benefit… there has never been an example of a rule that I’ve ever seen where everyone benefits.
Here’s a rule, leave it alone. Thank you for coming to my TED talk