Wer macht das bei klarem Verstand, anstatt noch 3 Stunden in Zürich zu bleiben und 20 Minuten später nach Hause zu kommen?
Darin enthalten ist ein Aufenthalt von 2 Stunden und 38 Minuten in Wankdorf und weitere 20 Minuten in Bern.
Ich verstehe, dass es wahrscheinlich nur das Ergebnis des Algorithmus ist, aber es erscheint dumm, dass dies überhaupt vorgeschlagen wird. Vielleicht sollte die SBB eine Option hinzufügen, um solches weißes Rauschen zu entfernen.
https://i.redd.it/yztzsfq5ng8h1.jpeg
Von Correct-Onion420
13 Kommentare
It’s staying in Zurich or Staying in Berne.
But also it’s for people going to Berne.
Some people would rather be in closed monitored space with comfortable sitting than loitering for three hours in the city at night.
You can sleep in the train
Wank Village 👍🏻
Send a suggestion to CFF about that.
Some people want to have „relations“ in Wankdorf.
Who in their right mind stays in Zurich that long?
Who in their right mind would cross Röstigraben at nighttime?
Next question would be „what qualifies as
*white noise*?“. A question with no objectively correct answer.
Wankdorf is dead at that time … bot dangerous at all.
If u want some fun lmk. Lol
It probably arrives earlier than the next better option. If you have to arrive earlier really really badly, SBB has you covered…
Off Topic, but I find the „IRN“ quite cool, when have they been introduced?
In the end, this is just SBB recommendation. You can look at the timetable, and plan your own trip. This is how it used to be 15 years ago
I feel like the algorithm will always show you the fastest connection it finds, no matter what. That leads to some weird connections like this one (it can come up with way worse ones) but they probably don’t want to start implementing filters to get rid of connections because that is a very subjective call to make.
People can just not take a connection they find ridiculous. They can’t take a connection they don’t know exists. So better to leave the choice to the consumer (at least in my opinion).