Das neue Outlook von Microsoft benötigt 10 Sekunden, um das zu tun, was Outlook Classic unter Windows sofort erledigt
https://www.windowslatest.com/2026/06/15/microsofts-new-outlook-takes-10-seconds-to-do-what-outlook-classic-does-instantly-on-windows/
26 Kommentare
2026 Microsoft software in a nutshell. More clutter, less performance.
Electron and its consequences have been a disaster for desktop [applications.It](http://applications.It) has subjected users to a world of ceaseless resource consumption and mediocre performance. Those who once enjoyed lean, native programs that started in milliseconds and used megabytes of RAM now find themselves launching glorified web browsers disguised as applications
Modern software is awesome.
Rewrite everything in Javascript with Electron and enjoy the amazing performance and memory usage!
Clearly it’s user fault, they should be buying a new machine with one of those stupid NPU CPUs.
I genuinely can’t fathom that Microsoft leadership doesn’t find anything wrong with the shit they’re releasing lately. Surely they use Windows and Outlook internally? They can’t possibly not feel the pain of what they’re unleashing upon us themselves, unless they’re using Macs. Which I can’t imagine either. Are people internally so afraid to speak out that everyone just pretends everything is fine?
Regular people regularly complain about Windows nowadays and it feels like it’s getting worse every month.
Say it with me peeps – EN-SHIT-TIF-I-CA-TION
New outlook has been atrocious from the beginning. Microsoft needs to rethink forcing orgs to use it.
Yay! More Microslop
I am astounded that new Outlook won’t let me filter emails received in the last five days THEN sort by sender. It will do the former but not the latter. Ridiculous!
taking something that worked instantly and making it take 10 seconds is an incredible amount of engineering effort in the wrong direction
Outlook is terrible.
They had a barebones „mail“ app before that was super fast/responsive. They killed it and replaced with the pile of shit that is outlook.
It’s quicker to access outlook through their website than it is to launch the app.
Every fucking time something mircoshit needs an upgrade, it gets worse.
If it wasn’t for the money Microsoft is making renting out their servers they would be sunk
Microsoft quality in every update.
If we turn PCs off, then M$ can’t steal our data. That’s why it has to stay on and connected.
Asked my Magic 8 Ball for an opinion on it and even it said ‘Outlook not so good’
All of software is like this. Companies keep loading their products with more and more „features“ that no one asked for, all to serve the almighty „line must go up“.
They need to just go back to original versions for all package.
>I have two Microsoft Outlooks and neither one is working.
– The crew of the Artemis II space mission
I’ve never used Outlook at home, and I’ve recently returned to Linux as a primary desktop (it never really left, about 80-90% of my personal systems have always been Linux, but the desktop is often another matter).
It’s always been clear to me just how much GUFF is in Windows, Microsoft applications, and the amount that affects the speeds of the things you do on a computer.
It’s a bit like on my phone – I have an Android and whenever I get a new phone, I immediately go into the developer settings and disable transitions and animations. You have NO IDEA how much faster your phone not only feels, but actually becomes, with that junk turned off.
And Windows is no different. It CHUGS on the simplest of things. It’s part of the reason why updates take FOREVER (especially .NET updates).
It’s also present in their office suite and other junk. People just aren’t old enough to remember when Windows applications just LOADED. A splashscreen was THEN brought in, years later, to cover them getting slower and slower. And now they often don’t have splashscreens but nothing happens for many seconds, with no user feedback at all.
Everything tries to cheat by „pre-caching“ with background services running all the time (thus slowing everything else down, so one app can appear to be slightly faster) – Adobe do it, Office does it, all kinds of things do it.
Mainstream software is just horrendously bloated on Windows now. It’s ludicrous. And then you download some piece of freeware that was written to run on systems 20+ years ago and it’s INSTANT. It doesn’t need to cheat, hide, or pre-cache. It’s just fast.
Compare, say, Irfanview to the Microsoft photo apps. Unbelievable difference.
And again, if you turn off the nonsense, things are instantaneous. I use keyboard shortcuts for running programs, not narrow-down AI search in an over-stuffed start menu, and it’s click, click, BOOM, there’s your programme and you can barely see the point at which it loaded.
Dozens of GBs of ridiculously-fast RAM, dozens of cores in our processors, running at stupid speeds. And what are we using it for? To let programmers be as lazy as possible. Windows Store apps are bloated. „Metro“ apps are bloated. .NET apps are bloated. Java apps are bloated. Everything’s just bloated to stupendous levels to save you having to actually just load the one function you want out of a 400MByte library.
As someone who programmes Windows apps in C, I see it all the time. And people are just USED to things being slow, having to be typed out, stuff running in the background, not appearing for SECONDS, etc .etc. and we’ve normalised it.
I’m from a time where having a BMP background wallpaper on Windows 3.1 actually noticeably slowed down the startup time. You learn to optimise.
And there’s NOTHING on modern Windows, and not much written in the last 20 years, which is optimised. It doesn’t take any effort at all, people are just lazy.
And then you go to Linux and you’ll see… the same hardware… just feels so much more responsive to everything you do. You don’t need benchmarks, but you can see the difference if you bother to run them. But you can tell instantly from the responsiveness of the UI.
On a fresh boot, Outlook or Word can take nearly a minute from the login screen to get loaded and „settle“ its disk and other activity. It’s pathetic and atrocious. But nobody seems to care because… that’s all you ever see nowadays.
Crazy lol. I remember when games and apps used to be built to be as efficient as possible.
Now games especially are purposefully bloated to make you choose. Sorry CoD, I choose the game that’s not 250gb.
Somewhere along the line we decided we’d just brute force everything.
I despise current outlook with a passion
It boggles my mind that the search bar works worse and worse with each passing year. Why the fuck would I want some algorithmic bs search when I search for a keyword? If it ever worked, sure, I’d be on board. But it never does, and now I need to scroll past what Outlook thought I was looking for to get to the chronological list
And apparently there’s a button that disables it, and apparently at some point I even found it. But it also apparently defaults to this „Top results“ every now and then
Why Microsoft. Whyyyy
That has been the theme for tech these past 10+ years.
Here is the new thing! It’s worse than the old thing! Oh, btw we deleted the old thing.
IMO, it boils down to making a better product vs making more tiers for more money.
That’s because it’s a shitty web app disguised as a desktop application using their WebView2 framework. That’s basically MSFT’s version of the Electron framework.
We moved from Google to Microsoft this year.
BIGGEST FUCKING MISTAKE OF OUR LIFE.
Teams is a piece of bloated confusing shit.
I’ve been conducting a simple test for the last 2 years or so of Outlook asking to try the new look. I’ve reported this (as a good product manager should) that this has been keeping me from new outlook:
**What I want:** To see all emails by sender *(without search, because search is slow and I want to jump between different people quickly)*
**What I do:** Sort by sender, start typing the name of the sender.
**Old Outlook:** Jumps to all emails from the sender
**New outlook:** wut?
Back to old outlook for another 6 months or so.