Close Menu
    Unterhaltung

    Aaron Sorkin hat versucht, Jesse Eisenberg als Mark Zuckerberg für „Social Reckoning“ zurückzubekommen, aber der Schauspieler möchte nicht mehr mit dem Facebook-Gründer „verwechselt“ werden


    Aaron Sorkin hat versucht, Jesse Eisenberg als Mark Zuckerberg für „Social Reckoning“ zurückzubekommen, aber der Schauspieler möchte nicht mehr mit dem Facebook-Gründer „verwechselt“ werden

    https://variety.com/2026/film/news/jesse-eisenberg-turned-down-social-reckoning-zuckerburg-sorkin-1236779766/

    Share.
    View 37 Comments

    37 Kommentare

    2. legendary_liar on

      Respect Jesse for his rationale for this. Given today’s environment I also 100% agree with him.

      How interesting would it really be to play a narcissistic douche when whatever is put on screen would likely be a watered down version of Zuck IRL?

    3. Top_Report_4895 on

      Look, after watching the Social Reckoning trailer I believe that Sorkin should write a movie that’s as out of his comfort zone as possible, like Sci-fi, fantasy, Superhero or a straightforward rom-com and let someone else direct it. He feels stagnant

    8. Automatic_Soil9814 on

      Eisenberg did such a good job in this role that I do conflate the two.  If I were him, I’d pass on this too. Imagine being typecast as a douche. 

    9. dylan_1992 on

      Does he not like playing himself, playing Zuckerberg?

      Seems like Jeremy Strong is actually trying to act like Mark.

    10. Cool-Contribution-68 on

      I think they should drop the „The.“ Just „Social Reckoning.“ It’s cleaner.

    14. ClosedContent on

      It’s funny how when the movie came out, I thought he was a little unrealistic with how Zuckerberg acted weird and “non-human” yet when you give it a few years you realize Zuckerberg was exactly that weird with the mannerisms.

    15. WarriorNeedFoodBadly on

      It works out because there are a couple of decades between the two stories. It shows the passage of time.

      Or are they closer than I think they are?

      Edit: It seems to only be six years. The first movie ends in 2010 with the deposition, and the new one supposedly picks up in 2016 with Cambridge Analytica.

    17. _evilalien_ on

      Ya, but Brent Spiner has experience playing a stiff robotic nerd disconnected from the human experience.

    18. choicetomake on

      Jeremy Strong is capable of playing Zuckerberg as we hear him. Jesse Eisenberg is capable of playing Zuckerberg’s high-functioning autism/mania.

    22. Agile_Land_9951 on

      Nothing like movies about tech billionaires. When does the Elon movie come out

      /s

    28. Budget-Ad5495 on

      Honestly Jeremy Strong IS the correct choice to play the Zuck between Eisenberg and Strong when it comes to this stage of the story.

      Others have said it, Eisenberg played him in his youth very well. That was excellent casting.

      I get why Sorkin would try, that rejection lead to a better choice though.

      I’m hoping they put it out there now so that they can avoid the comparison all together in interviews.

      Strong is one of the best actors of this generation and if the trailer is any indicator – he’s locked tf in.

    29. CompetitiveWill5088 on

      Yeah, I was attracted to Jesse’s zuck despite being an ah. Good choice for the climate of today

    31. jeff13731 on

      I wonder if Jesse read some of the leaked memos at Meta that show how gleefully they preyed on an entire generation of kids, he’d change his mind. And be brave

    32. insertUserNamehereno on

      I respect the hell out of this stance. Imagine playing a rapist and the rest of your career people are like “he’s so good at playing a rapist he really nailed the role.” I’d never want to go back lmao Cuckerberg isn’t a rapist but he’s certainly non consensually fucked the entire internet.

    34. FangornLeghorn on

      I mean, it’d be the third time he played Zuckerberg so I can understand why he passed.

    Leave A Reply