Die Demokraten lehnten Trumps Redestil stärker ab als die Republikaner den von Harris. Wähler zeigen ein unterschiedliches Maß an Toleranz gegenüber gegnerischen politischen Kandidaten, wobei Donald Trump bei rivalisierenden Wählern deutlich mehr Ablehnung erfährt als Kamala Harris.
Democrats rejected Trump’s speaking style more than Republicans rejected Harris’s
33 Kommentare
Most ordinary people do too.
Well, yeah. Harris spoke very intelligibly even if you disagreed with her. Trump was ranting about Haitians eating dogs and cats.
Edit: Like, I don’t think this really says anything about anyone other than that Republicans have very low standards as long as someone tells them they’re pretty.
he’s a rambling fool who speaks as if speaking to toddlers.
Harris spoke in complete sentences and didn’t sound like she was having a stroke…
I can’t physically bring myself to listen to Trump speak.
I’m less opposed to his „speaking style“ than I am to the blatant corruption and criminality.
>“It is crucial to distinguish between agreeing with a message and tolerating the ‘form’ or style in which it is delivered; our study focuses on the latter…“
Yeah. I don’t even know what this means. I tried to sort it out from the article, but couldn’t. And the article doesn’t appear to explain how the researchers separated content from style.
Cool cool. Now, hear me out: let’s remove his name from all the things.
Yes. I reject Trump’s stroke inducing speaking style. I dont want to listen to him talk, no matter what he has to say.
Republicans hate Harris because she’s mixed race African American and Indian and a woman. Democrats hate Trump because he’s an ignorant, cruel, credibly accused pedophile who has been adjudicated as a rapist and is a 34 count felon who can’t speak. He’s proudly ignorant and disgusting.
This is like saying that a Michelin restaurant is a better place to eat than an outhouse.
They’re literally on different tiers of intellect. Imagine thinking this was a speaking style issue.
Lying, insulting, violent, and childish.
I wonder why people would reject that?
I would be more interested in seeing a comparison to a neocon that didn’t sound like they were confused and talking to a toddler.
Compare Harris to say GHWB (Bush Senior).
He has a distinct speaking style – and I disagree with almost all of his positions, but I don’t take issue with his style. (GWB is a different story – because he intentionally cultivated an „ah shucks“ good old boy accent)
Are you the same person that posted this a few hours ago and then deleted it because everyone was calling out how bad it was?
https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/1u45zp7/comment/oramlzg/?context=3
The feedback on this post is generally the same. It is mostly calling out that the study missed a lot(or all of) the variables they should have actually studied like how different the speaking styles are. It didn’t physically hurt to hear Mccain, the bushes, or Romney speak.
My favorite reply to the other post
„Attributing the greater mismatch between Democrats and Trump to intolerant Democrats rather than an intolerable Trump is a satirical premise.“
of course people are gonna reject his speaking style when it solely consists of rambling and talking over political opposition when he hears something he doesn’t like
Some people have a sufficient understanding of reality that they know when someone is just lying. It’s not Trump’s style that’s the problem: It’s the substance.
Talking like a person who didn’t make past elementary school and saying you don’t care about Americans financial situation will do that.
Harris’ sins are “a weird laugh” and typical politician answers to questions, while Trumps sins are…too numerous to count.
What speaking style? He never completes a sentence. Can’t keep his story straight. Rambles incoherently.
Even his biggest fans don’t listen to him. They just read what the media sanewashed from his speech later.
To refer to what this clown does with his face anus as „speaking style“ is doing an injustice to those of us who can actually string together more than two words cognizantly.
He speaks like 6 year old who was dropped on his head.
Trump perpetually whines and repeats phrases regardless of topic (“people are telling me…”, “the greatest…”, etc). Clearcut bullshitter characteristics.
What ever did that study conclude that looked if people could distinguish BS from profound statements?
Incoherent and off topic is how I hear his speaking style. If he could stop rambling and stop complimenting himself during them i wouldn’t have a problem with how he talks.
Probably because Trump’s speaking style is just insult anyone and everyone who doesnt kneel and kiss his boot, all the while spewing blatant lie after blatant lie.
I expect the President of the United States to be at least above average in intelligence. His speaking style is is what you’d expect from a narcissistic and dumb rich kid who just plowed through life lying and grifting everything and everyone around him.
How can anyone listen to Trump and think „yeah. That incoherent rambling. That’s who I want in charge“
Read:
Democrats reject incoherent speech from opposing candidate more then republicans reject coherent speech from opposing candidate.
Is there no objective reality?
Borderline malpractice to try to generalize reactions to Trump’s speaking style to broader political speech
Because Harris was a normal human being and Trump is the dumbest person to ever have this much success in world history.
Yes, yes, of coarse. If you dislike president Golfwait, it’s because you’re an intolerant liberal. I cannot believe we call this science.