Der Abstand zur Hälfte betrug 27, und der größte Abstand bestand im zweiten Quartal (71-42) und im dritten Quartal (81-52).
Größtes Comeback in der Geschichte der NBA-Finals.
Die Spurs erzielten 71 % ihrer Punkte in der ersten Halbzeit, die Knicks 48 %.
Ziemlich tolles Spiel.
Von drsupermrcool
13 Kommentare
Source: [https://www.nba.com/game/sas-vs-nyk-0042500404/play-by-play?period=All](https://www.nba.com/game/sas-vs-nyk-0042500404/play-by-play?period=All)
Tools: Excel
I’m trying to forget this game ever happened, thank you very much
Nice graph tho
OG my heart is yours. What a man
Estimating R^2 for this is kinda hilarious, yes as time goes on more points are scored
nice, but i think a parallel vertical facet with the *margin* would do more work than forcing people to estimate it visually
You should check out the win probability chart on ESPN. Completely parabolic and then a spike at the end for the Knicks lol
down 29 at halftime and they still won, i would have turned this game off and missed the greatest comeback in NBA Finals history like an idiot
I stopped watching in the second as regular season baseball seemed likely to be more interesting…sigh
The Spurs really need to learn how to close out. Probably too late for this series though.
Looks like the Knicks just kept chugging along at the same rate, meanwhile the Spurs just stopped scoring in the second half.
I really enjoyed seeing this chart once, closing it, then checking the score much later and watching it change
I don’t now which game this is, but seeing R^2 values makes my heart warm.
This is a great example of why showing the score progression over time tells a better story than just showing the final comeback number. The lead looks impossible at halftime, but in the second-half it’s clear to see that the Spurs’ scoring rate collapsed while the Knicks just kept applying pressure possession after possession.