Close Menu
    Technik

    Richter lernt, dass Anwälte auf beiden Seiten des Falles KI einsetzen, bricht den Prozess ab und wirft alle aus dem Fall


    Richter lernt, dass Anwälte auf beiden Seiten des Falles KI einsetzen, bricht den Prozess ab und wirft alle aus dem Fall

    https://www.404media.co/judge-learns-lawyers-on-both-sides-of-case-used-ai-cancels-trial-kicks-everyone-off-the-case/

    Share.
    View 20 Comments

    20 Kommentare

    1. Hi_Im_Dadbot on

      Ooh. A small fine. That’ll learn em.

      Who knew that perjuring yourself in court was such an irrelevant action for a lawyer.

    3. hamolton on

      Purposely misleading headline. They got in trouble not just because they used AI, but because they cited nonexistent, hallucinated cases while making their arguments. There are AI tools built for lawyers that actually work.

    4. carthuscrass on

      Looking up legal precedent and cases is fine. These guys didn’t verify their sources though and ended up citing things that didn’t happen. They didn’t get in trouble for *using* AI. They got in trouble because they trusted it as their only source.

    7. limbodog on

      So… Can you sue your lawyer if they fuck up so badly that the judge throws them off the trial for using AI rather than doing the job they agreed to do?

    9. saver1212 on

      We are *this* close to the dystopia of pro-AI usage judges who won’t check the sources either, allowing their own ChatGPT instance to replace their clerks and rubber-stamp every hallucinated citation as A-Okay.

      I can only assume this is exactly the addiction and erosion of critical thinking AI tech broligarchs desire.

    11. Gloomy-Insurance-739 on

      The judge should have disbarred them. Would sent a stronger message and nip this problem in the bud before it becomes a full-blown problem.

    13. ScriptioAfricanus on

      Maybe a dumb question but whenever I go on Linkedin Jobs I see more and more companies DEMANDING that applicants be heavy AI users. Are law firms pushing this behavior or is this just a case of lazy lawyers?

    15. Solidarieta on

      If a human legal aide was consistently this bad, wouldn’t they be fired? Why keep using the glorified magic 8 ball known as AI?

    16. Philodendron69 on

      Bro can the judges talk to the fuckin partners shoving this shit down our throats

    17. Pale-Acanthaceae-736 on

      AI has only a few redeeming qualities. Using it for everything in society is a speedrun to the America we see in the movie Idiocracy. We really need to shame lazy-brained people like these lawyers by making an example out of them. They’re not doing any favors to mankind’s development.

    18. TheMirrorWisdom on

      Seriously, what is the point of conditioning your brain, studying hard, preparing for LSATs, then taking out $300,000 in student loans to attend law school..

      ..if (like everything else in the end), we’re just going to throw it over to *synthetic thought*?

      I want out of this f**king timeline.

    19. FringeyHodor on

      Insurance Companies have been using AI for years, technically not on the defense side, but for personal injury cases.

    Leave A Reply