They should be banned from being used in public all together.
Mental_Relation_2175 on
Wow. That will stop that.
AdultContemporaneous on
Yeah, full stop, if I met a random person or new colleague who wore these, I would immediately be a casual chipper gray rock with that person.
CLTGUY on
I always get downvoted for this, but I will say it again. ANYONE can record you with a button camera in 8K! These glasses are NOTHING compared to the surveillance technology out there that pervs can use!
Also, you have zero privacy! You have Flock cameras, store cameras, shoe cameras recording everyone in public!
And yet. You get upset over these ugly glasses. So stupid.
If these glasses upset you so much, then you should be out fighting for tough privacy laws. And, yes, having glasses recording you without your consent is horrible for your privacy and should be outlawed. However, you’ve been putting up with way worse for many years. And yet…recording glasses breaks your brains…ugh.
Ill_Following_7022 on
To everyone saying there’s wasy to get around the light or cover it up, you are right. The most prudent course of action is to assume anyone wearing smart glasses is filming you, is a creep, is a douchce, and subject to the bird🦤 as well as ostracization.
Glittering-Living585 on
the fact that it takes a law to make companies put a light on a camera tells you everything about where their priorities were
ToolTimeT on
Flock camera’s of course not required to have a light as it records our movement. but citizens have to provide such things.
Haunting_Werewolf130 on
There’s a guy in Dallas that charges a fee to remove the recording light from Meta glasses. He even has a Tiktok. It’s mostly men too! I don’t even want to think about what are those men gonna do with those modified Meta glasses. The other day I saw guys wearing Rayban glasses in the locker room. I didn’t know what to do for a second, because I can’t tell if they were Meta glasses or regular rayban glasses because they both are made by Rayban and look almost the same.
-M-o-X- on
“Australia is banning social media for kids”
Well yeah but you can say something and put up a nominal effort without actually doing anything
pathf1nder00 on
Now do Flock.
Dalek_Chaos on
Right under this post Reddit fed me a rayban meta ad.
-illusoryMechanist on
What if we just… didn’t have the glasses in the first place
Infymus on
We’re literally going to end in a scanner darkly.
laughinglion77 on
A problem would be when you see the recording light the guy with the glasses would also be seeing and recording you.
fighterpilottim on
This is the lowest possible bar
qwertyqyle on
This title is super click-baity. This only applies to sets made or sold in the state of Pennsylvania. Which already has the most extreme anti-privacy laws the the US. Its not even the filming of video that is the problem, its the filming of audio.
If doesn’t matter if its a privae webcam, cell phone, or anything. If you are filming somewhere that affords any sort of pricay, you need a sign saying „audio and video is being recorded“
So the law will just add in the a red recording light suffices for that signage.
And if you want to break the law and get a 3rd degree felony for some odd reason, you can still just go one state over and buy a pair with no red light.
Rakkuuuu on
They need to go way further and make deterring laws for posting without the consent of the people in the videos.
Starship_Taru on
I remember my mom not wanting to buy me a phone with a camera because they might get banned due to privacy issues.
Boy that mentality really went out the societal window when the zuck got rich
thegooddoktorjones on
„Oh it’s not recording. It’s just identifying everything in my field of vision and making a super detailed 3d mapping of it and sharing it with marketers, the NSA or anyone else who pays 5 cents for it.“
BooBeeAttack on
The problem is it’s not very enforceable law when the lights can be covered with tape or disabled.
But I like the idea.
I wish we didn’t live in a world where a camera can hide in pretty much everything along with microphones and all sorts of tech, but we do, and as much as I may like that to change it’s not going to unless something very dramatic occurs.
Arrow156 on
Also include a shutter noise whenever it takes a single picture, that way they can’t just cycle it off and on.
kaptainkeel on
Is there some kind of campaign going on for this? I’m not necessarily saying it’s a bad thing–just why have I seen half a dozen different posts about this hit the frontpage today, when I haven’t seen any for months before this? I don’t mean just this law, but negative news articles as well.
dittod123 on
Smart glasses are the least of your concerns you are recorded everywhere you go. Go after corporations not consumers with privacy laws.
wandering-monster on
Yeah that seems reasonable.
If you disagree: why are you recording people and don’t want them to know?
nickdoesmagic on
Better law. Smart glasses are fucking illegal
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
26 Kommentare
ngl I wish most phones / cameras required this
They should be banned from being used in public all together.
Wow. That will stop that.
Yeah, full stop, if I met a random person or new colleague who wore these, I would immediately be a casual chipper gray rock with that person.
I always get downvoted for this, but I will say it again. ANYONE can record you with a button camera in 8K! These glasses are NOTHING compared to the surveillance technology out there that pervs can use!
Also, you have zero privacy! You have Flock cameras, store cameras, shoe cameras recording everyone in public!
And yet. You get upset over these ugly glasses. So stupid.
If these glasses upset you so much, then you should be out fighting for tough privacy laws. And, yes, having glasses recording you without your consent is horrible for your privacy and should be outlawed. However, you’ve been putting up with way worse for many years. And yet…recording glasses breaks your brains…ugh.
To everyone saying there’s wasy to get around the light or cover it up, you are right. The most prudent course of action is to assume anyone wearing smart glasses is filming you, is a creep, is a douchce, and subject to the bird🦤 as well as ostracization.
the fact that it takes a law to make companies put a light on a camera tells you everything about where their priorities were
Flock camera’s of course not required to have a light as it records our movement. but citizens have to provide such things.
There’s a guy in Dallas that charges a fee to remove the recording light from Meta glasses. He even has a Tiktok. It’s mostly men too! I don’t even want to think about what are those men gonna do with those modified Meta glasses. The other day I saw guys wearing Rayban glasses in the locker room. I didn’t know what to do for a second, because I can’t tell if they were Meta glasses or regular rayban glasses because they both are made by Rayban and look almost the same.
“Australia is banning social media for kids”
Well yeah but you can say something and put up a nominal effort without actually doing anything
Now do Flock.
Right under this post Reddit fed me a rayban meta ad.
What if we just… didn’t have the glasses in the first place
We’re literally going to end in a scanner darkly.
A problem would be when you see the recording light the guy with the glasses would also be seeing and recording you.
This is the lowest possible bar
This title is super click-baity. This only applies to sets made or sold in the state of Pennsylvania. Which already has the most extreme anti-privacy laws the the US. Its not even the filming of video that is the problem, its the filming of audio.
If doesn’t matter if its a privae webcam, cell phone, or anything. If you are filming somewhere that affords any sort of pricay, you need a sign saying „audio and video is being recorded“
So the law will just add in the a red recording light suffices for that signage.
And if you want to break the law and get a 3rd degree felony for some odd reason, you can still just go one state over and buy a pair with no red light.
They need to go way further and make deterring laws for posting without the consent of the people in the videos.
I remember my mom not wanting to buy me a phone with a camera because they might get banned due to privacy issues.
Boy that mentality really went out the societal window when the zuck got rich
„Oh it’s not recording. It’s just identifying everything in my field of vision and making a super detailed 3d mapping of it and sharing it with marketers, the NSA or anyone else who pays 5 cents for it.“
The problem is it’s not very enforceable law when the lights can be covered with tape or disabled.
But I like the idea.
I wish we didn’t live in a world where a camera can hide in pretty much everything along with microphones and all sorts of tech, but we do, and as much as I may like that to change it’s not going to unless something very dramatic occurs.
Also include a shutter noise whenever it takes a single picture, that way they can’t just cycle it off and on.
Is there some kind of campaign going on for this? I’m not necessarily saying it’s a bad thing–just why have I seen half a dozen different posts about this hit the frontpage today, when I haven’t seen any for months before this? I don’t mean just this law, but negative news articles as well.
Smart glasses are the least of your concerns you are recorded everywhere you go. Go after corporations not consumers with privacy laws.
Yeah that seems reasonable.
If you disagree: why are you recording people and don’t want them to know?
Better law. Smart glasses are fucking illegal