Share.

    17 Kommentare

    1. Let’s wait till the otherside confirms

      This dude is constantly juking the market

    2. Flipflops365 on

      Unless it is a joint statement by both nations, I will not believe it to be true.

    3. ComprehensiveKiwi489 on

      Also from the NYT article: „*U.S. officials said that the proposal* ***did not settle*** *the issue of precisely how Iran would give up its stockpile, putting off the details for a coming round of talks on Iran’s nuclear program*.“

      So, we remove the blockade, and then remove all US troops from the region, and then discuss details of the nuclear issue? Why wouldn’t they just continue to deflect and extend the deadline, if we no longer have any leverage?

    4. AdultContemporaneous on

      It’s wild that I am sitting here as an American waiting for a confirmation from *checks notes* Iran, as confirmation about what my government is doing.

    5. Tech-Film3905 on

      Iran would have to be crazy to give up its enriched uranium. That would encourage the US and Israel to make nuclear strike threats against Iran freely. The uranium is deterence, insurance policy.

    6. exploringspace_ on

      Soooo the JCPOA 😂
      That’s not what Bibi wants, so this is just a market pump.

    7. Why would they? They’ve had the upper hand since the beginning of the US/Israeli attacks on their soil

    8. ChiGorilla1127 on

      In 18 months, Trump has made America weaker then it’s ever been in my lifetime.

    9. PrestigiousArt9720 on

      NY Times says that the US agrees with stop the blockade, unfreeze assets, lift sanctions and withdraw troops from around Irans borders…..lol. Seems like iran got alot of what they wanted

    10. GritGrinder on

      Very untrustworthy source, going to have to wait on further confirmation

    11. The bigger operational question nobody seems to be asking: even if Iran exports the stockpile, what happens to the enrichment capacity itself? They’ve got thousands of advanced centrifuges running. Breakout time isn’t just about how much 60% enriched uranium you have sitting around it’s about how fast you can make more once you decide to.

      JCPOA dealt with this by capping centrifuge numbers and types for a decade. If this deal skips that part and just focuses on the existing stockpile, you’re solving the symptom while leaving the infrastructure that created it untouched. Iran could be back at the same enrichment levels in under a year.

      The other timing issue: exporting or diluting enriched uranium isn’t instant. JCPOA implementation took months of IAEA verification before sanctions lifted. If the sequencing here is sanctions relief first, then we negotiate how they actually give it up later, that’s backwards from how verification normally works.

      Has anyone seen details on whether centrifuge limits are even part of this, or is it genuinely just stockpile-focused?

    12. DevilsMasseuse on

      This is basically a surrender. They did not agree to give up the uranium. They agreed to discuss it in the future. Plus the US agreed to lift sanctions, stop the blockade, remove troops from the region. Its a travesty of a self-inflicted wound that so obviously played out in front of everyone that can’t be spun. I know there are still Trump diehards who will insist that he did everything right here, even as the USA loses allies and becomes increasingly isolated economically, diplomatically, and strategically.

      This stupid war has accelerated the decline of the USA by orders of magnitude and I don’t see many other Presidents capable of such stupidity.

    13. I saw the cliff notes of this; it was honestly embarrassing how much Trump gave them as concessions. Starting this fight was one of the worst moves he’s made across presidencies. He got taken to the cleaners.

    14. war was won 22 times.. and deal has been reached 43 times.. so far.. /doubt.. waiting for Iran to say nothing happen

      it’s something else that you can’t trust what US president actually says.. and everything is a lie

    Leave A Reply