For some reason it seems to top out at the 90s in all countries and never moves above that. Ukraine doesn’t count as it’s a war zone.
TheStoneMask on
Portugal can into nordics?
Ijatsu on
It’s not „no data“ it’s „not beautiful“
MegazordPilot on
Is this in full-time equivalent? In other words, is one woman employed part-time for a man employed full-time counted as 50 or 100 on this map?
GroundbreakingBag164 on
Hilarious that there was basically no noticeable change in Poland for 35 years while the DACH countries caught up
Italy is surprising though. Didn’t expect it to be so low
LurkersUniteAgain on
moldovs would not be who id think about for the most equal nation in labor ratios
somethingspecificidk on
I read that as „ratio of ftm labor force participation…“
Roquet_ on
I may be bad at reading graphs but does that mean for every 100 men there are say 84 women participating in labor?
FandomMenace on
So you’re saying only 12.1% of Swedish men work? Is this real life.
Labudism on
OP needs to learn what a ratio is
suggestiveinnuendo on
I love the judicious choice of colour, poland scrounged up a 1.6% change but that got them a whole new shade of blue
ClaroStar on
Turkey stuck in the past. Maybe because of religious conservatism?
233C on
We used to be able to feed a family of 4 on a single salary, now it takes two but we call it victory.
More gender equality in society overall is great, and women definitely need more, but „more women in the work force“ was the best marketing trick since the „[Torches of freedom](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torches_of_Freedom)“.
Big business marketed more financial independence for women and got more workers in the market to drive salaries down.
We could have had a society with equal share of male and female workers, with their corresponding stay at home partner; heck even alternate or two part times.
african_or_european on
The fact that the capitalization of World Bank Group in the bottom left of the images differ *totally ruins it for me*! =P
mein-shekel on
I interprete the second chart to mean that Ukraine has no women. No I will not investigate further or examine this belief.
/s
anewpath123 on
What an awful way to show this data. I think if you gave like 6 options this would easily be the worst
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
23 Kommentare
Source: [https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.CACT.FM.ZS?view=map](https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.CACT.FM.ZS?view=map)
Tool: Datawrapper
your decimal marks are inconsistent and you dont define the „ratio“
Edit: also, the title makes it more confusing.
„Labor force participation rate“ is its own metric and it is a %. So its a ratio of the two percentages instead?
Now, is it because they *can* or because they *have* to because it gets harder and harder to sustain a family with a single income?
Presumably the numbers are percentages (ie number of female labour force participants per 100 male participants)?
Romania bucking the trend
Here’s the labour force partecipation rates by NUTS 2 region (2024):
Females
https://preview.redd.it/zk94d87yhx2h1.png?width=825&format=png&auto=webp&s=83a1ab6a0822a71d41e04271d66928067b4c37cf
Poland barely changed but it changed color
For some reason it seems to top out at the 90s in all countries and never moves above that. Ukraine doesn’t count as it’s a war zone.
Portugal can into nordics?
It’s not „no data“ it’s „not beautiful“
Is this in full-time equivalent? In other words, is one woman employed part-time for a man employed full-time counted as 50 or 100 on this map?
Hilarious that there was basically no noticeable change in Poland for 35 years while the DACH countries caught up
Italy is surprising though. Didn’t expect it to be so low
moldovs would not be who id think about for the most equal nation in labor ratios
I read that as „ratio of ftm labor force participation…“
I may be bad at reading graphs but does that mean for every 100 men there are say 84 women participating in labor?
So you’re saying only 12.1% of Swedish men work? Is this real life.
OP needs to learn what a ratio is
I love the judicious choice of colour, poland scrounged up a 1.6% change but that got them a whole new shade of blue
Turkey stuck in the past. Maybe because of religious conservatism?
We used to be able to feed a family of 4 on a single salary, now it takes two but we call it victory.
More gender equality in society overall is great, and women definitely need more, but „more women in the work force“ was the best marketing trick since the „[Torches of freedom](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torches_of_Freedom)“.
Big business marketed more financial independence for women and got more workers in the market to drive salaries down.
We could have had a society with equal share of male and female workers, with their corresponding stay at home partner; heck even alternate or two part times.
The fact that the capitalization of World Bank Group in the bottom left of the images differ *totally ruins it for me*! =P
I interprete the second chart to mean that Ukraine has no women. No I will not investigate further or examine this belief.
/s
What an awful way to show this data. I think if you gave like 6 options this would easily be the worst