I seriously hope we can one day change the constitution (just probably not in our lifetime) to remove life tenure for judges.
OnlyMamaKnows on
Should be Democrats plural, but that would be impolite.
B-Z_B-S on
(Congressman Steve Cohen’s Articles of Impeachment):
„Article One – The Chief Justice allowed the Court to become a partisan force, in breach of the constitutional guarantee of a republican form of government, due process, and equal protection of the laws, and the Chief Justice’s obligation to “administer justice without respect to persons” and “faithfully and impartially” discharge his duties. Time and time again, the Court has violated its own principles with a pattern of interfering in elections on behalf of Republican candidates.
Article Two – Under Chief Justice Roberts’ stewardship, the Court systematically preferred the powerful over the people, undermining the notions of popular sovereignty, representation, and democracy at the heart of a constitutional republic. Taken together, Chief Justice Roberts led the Court to license a system of political exclusion that could entrench minority rule at the expense of the will of the people – a grave violation, with incalculable damage, to participatory democracy enshrined in our Constitution.
Article Three – Chief Justice Roberts violated his oath to “do equal right to the poor and the rich” by endorsing a corrupt campaign finance system that privileges the wealthy at the expense of all other citizens.
Article Four – Chief Justice Roberts violated the Constitution of the United States and his Judicial Oath by usurping Congress’s legislative role and exempting the President of the United States from criminal liability for illegal conduct. In placing a single person above the law, Chief Justice Roberts breached his oath to “administer justice without respect to persons.”
Article Five: Chief Justice Roberts’s leadership of the Court is marked by the Court’s arbitrary, unexplained, and inconsistent decisions that violate the Constitutional protections of the parties.
Article Six: Chief Justice Roberts violated his ethical and statutory obligations by failing to fully report assets on his financial disclosures and refusing to recuse himself from cases that presented perceptions of a conflict of interest. While on the bench adjudicating some of the most sensitive matters, Jane Sullivan Roberts, the Chief Justice’s spouse, was being paid millions of dollars to recruit attorneys by the very firms litigating before the Court. This conduct directly violates 28 U.S.C. § 455. More importantly, it violates the constitutional structure and the parties’ constitutional rights to an independent and impartial magistrate to adjudicate their claims.“
CP_Chronicler on
Proverbially burn this MF and his entire family and his allies in his Supreme Court cabal to the f***ing ground. Respond to the war they’ve been waging against the Constitution and the people by waging war against them.
Fantastic_Stock_6819 on
I think John would feel less lonely if he could have his pals like Alito and Thomas join him in the impeachment club. Dem’s should go for the hat trick on this one.
kwit-bsn on
It’s very well written… and will go absolutely nowhere
enjoycarrots on
I’m all for impeaching him, but on the (minuscule) chance that this was successful in removing him, would we want that to happen while Trump is still president and able to appoint a younger replacement that’s even more partisan?
Actual__Wizard on
I read the entire complaint and I agree with all of it because it’s all true.
EmperorAxiom on
I don’t disagree that he should be impeached.I disagree that he should be impeached at this moment. If this succeeded trump gets another pick fuck that
MrRuck1 on
Better pray that one of them doesn’t step down. I could see that happening. And Trump gets a fourth pick.
2LiveGucciCrew on
In a perfect world the next Democratic president would be an aggressive anti Trump. Who would appoint Jack Smith AG. Then tell him to go after all these corrupt clowns.
aslan_is_on_the_move on
No he doesn’t. It’s not going to go anywhere since Republicans are in charge
Tarnmaster on
About time with Alito on deck…
royalnautiloid on
I wouldn’t call it “facing”, but sure.
blyzo on
Rep Cohen is retiring because his Memphis seat got carved up due to the overturning of the Voting Rights Act.
So a fitting FU on his way out.
Even though it won’t go anywhere, it’ll be part of Roberts legacy that an impeachment resolution was filed against him.
Omega_art on
It isn’t going to go anywhere but that’s probably good because Rump will put in someone far worse.
CloudTransit on
It’s political! Oh no, John Roberts will be so sad. The poor man detests anything political.
USCanuck on
Remove Roberts so trump can appoint someone 30 years younger? Maybe go after the orange turd first.
Choice-of-SteinsGate on
We need to amend the Court so that an actual code of ethics can be enforced.
It’s no coincidence that public trust in SCOTUS has plummeted on his watch.
Remember that the Senate published a huge report detailing how the Court „allowed a culture of misconduct to metastasize into a full-blown crisis.“
Roberts basically scoffed…
The same guy who has been pushing back for years against criticisms of the Court’s politicization, but was the one who authored Trump’s immunity ruling, and also continues to rule in Trump’s favor on unprecedented numbers of „shadow dockets.“
JamesTiberiusCrunk on
This is a headline that only matters to people who don’t know how the government works
adorientem88 on
He doesn’t face anything. The resolution is fundamentally not serious and is obviously DOA in the House.
Deaths_Rifleman on
Why the fuck would this be a good idea? You impeach the chief justice to allow Trump to appoint yet another young cult member? This seems really really fucking short sighted
in1gom0ntoya on
this would be the worst time to do this.
baranimirsel on
this is gonna go nowhere fast
Wayofchinchilla on
Democrats absolutely need to be doing what Republicans did with project 2025 and putting together a comprehensive one might even say vindictive plan for not how to screw people but fundamentally change and reform the system that is so broken this country absolutely needs an update to its system and then out the top of that list should be plans for how to reform the Supreme Court.
Kneph on
Let’s hand another lifetime appointment to Donald Trump and the Heritage Foundation.
Ansem18 on
It won’t go anywhere…
Dexx009 on
Good, fuck John Roberts.
RightTrash on
Get him and then the other cultist criminal traitors out.
redditpest on
I dont like the timing of this. Its obviously not going to go anywhere and it just gives Republicans fodder for their „extremest liberals“ talking point. It could sway some independents in toss up states. This would have been something that would have been nice to pursue after the dems hopefully won the house. Then it may pick up some traction and would send a message that the dems are willing to fight
KamKorn on
The constitution is used to stop Democratic presidents and ignored by Republican ones
Pyro1934 on
This feels dangerous… sure he’s a cheat, but that gives Trump another appointment.
RadiantPerception224 on
Idk how these „justices“ fucking sleep at night, know full well the destruction of America they’ve enabled.
Practical-Ball1437 on
Great idea, make the Chief Justice role vacant during a trump term…
Nanojack on
Cynical leftist viewpoint:and let *Trump* pick the next Chief Justice of the United States?
Embarrassed_Hold6608 on
So impeach an institutionalist who is more likely to side with the liberal justices on issues than most of the conservative justices? And impeach him less than two years into the Trump administration guaranteeing Trump gets to appoint his replacement? It’s a good thing that this resolution stands no chance of passing because this is textbook cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Alito and Thomas are the justices that most need impeaching and not until we have a new administration.
Firm-Film-3594 on
I hope they screw all these scumbags to the wall. What a bunch of grifters and henchmen.
Turdsley on
Aileen Cannon about to get a promotion.
anywon1 on
We have to protect the country from these people.
SenseiT on
You don’t get more partisan than Roberts and you don’t get more corrupt than Thomas.
AWall925 on
I don’t like this “tactical impeachment” point of view I see some people have. Like they want Roberts gone because he’s committed impeachable offenses (as of today), but then want to wait x years to do it because a Republican is the president.
If you think he’s done all these horrible things, then get him out ASAP.
*I don’t think this position is completely equivalent with being “holier than thou”, but it shares a lot of similarities.
RantRanger on
This is risky. Trump could urge the Republicans to pick this up and ram it through.
Like they did with the “Release the Epstein Files” vote.
If this gets to the Senate, I could see Republicans happily piling on to push this over the two thirds hurdle.
whyheonlysayneat on
nothing will happen
altitudearts on
He’s not even the worst one!
sphinxsley on
Super annoyed Biden refused to widen the court when he was in office.
MudAlternative8887 on
Way to rev up the Republicans.
thepartypantser on
I think the timing on this is bad. It’s telegraphing the punches, it’s showing your hand.
This will result in more weaponized propaganda to bring out Republican voters.
It does nothing right now, has no chance of going anywhere, and should have been held back until after the mid-tetm elections
Pr3sidentOfCascadia on
Stupid idea. Wait until we retake the elements of govt we can and pack the court. Do it fast and no quarter. make Roberts irrelevant instantly. Then use the avenues Trump created and hit it hard, only giving in when the other side agrees to create laws that restrict their collective action.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
48 Kommentare
I seriously hope we can one day change the constitution (just probably not in our lifetime) to remove life tenure for judges.
Should be Democrats plural, but that would be impolite.
(Congressman Steve Cohen’s Articles of Impeachment):
„Article One – The Chief Justice allowed the Court to become a partisan force, in breach of the constitutional guarantee of a republican form of government, due process, and equal protection of the laws, and the Chief Justice’s obligation to “administer justice without respect to persons” and “faithfully and impartially” discharge his duties. Time and time again, the Court has violated its own principles with a pattern of interfering in elections on behalf of Republican candidates.
Article Two – Under Chief Justice Roberts’ stewardship, the Court systematically preferred the powerful over the people, undermining the notions of popular sovereignty, representation, and democracy at the heart of a constitutional republic. Taken together, Chief Justice Roberts led the Court to license a system of political exclusion that could entrench minority rule at the expense of the will of the people – a grave violation, with incalculable damage, to participatory democracy enshrined in our Constitution.
Article Three – Chief Justice Roberts violated his oath to “do equal right to the poor and the rich” by endorsing a corrupt campaign finance system that privileges the wealthy at the expense of all other citizens.
Article Four – Chief Justice Roberts violated the Constitution of the United States and his Judicial Oath by usurping Congress’s legislative role and exempting the President of the United States from criminal liability for illegal conduct. In placing a single person above the law, Chief Justice Roberts breached his oath to “administer justice without respect to persons.”
Article Five: Chief Justice Roberts’s leadership of the Court is marked by the Court’s arbitrary, unexplained, and inconsistent decisions that violate the Constitutional protections of the parties.
Article Six: Chief Justice Roberts violated his ethical and statutory obligations by failing to fully report assets on his financial disclosures and refusing to recuse himself from cases that presented perceptions of a conflict of interest. While on the bench adjudicating some of the most sensitive matters, Jane Sullivan Roberts, the Chief Justice’s spouse, was being paid millions of dollars to recruit attorneys by the very firms litigating before the Court. This conduct directly violates 28 U.S.C. § 455. More importantly, it violates the constitutional structure and the parties’ constitutional rights to an independent and impartial magistrate to adjudicate their claims.“
Proverbially burn this MF and his entire family and his allies in his Supreme Court cabal to the f***ing ground. Respond to the war they’ve been waging against the Constitution and the people by waging war against them.
I think John would feel less lonely if he could have his pals like Alito and Thomas join him in the impeachment club. Dem’s should go for the hat trick on this one.
It’s very well written… and will go absolutely nowhere
I’m all for impeaching him, but on the (minuscule) chance that this was successful in removing him, would we want that to happen while Trump is still president and able to appoint a younger replacement that’s even more partisan?
I read the entire complaint and I agree with all of it because it’s all true.
I don’t disagree that he should be impeached.I disagree that he should be impeached at this moment. If this succeeded trump gets another pick fuck that
Better pray that one of them doesn’t step down. I could see that happening. And Trump gets a fourth pick.
In a perfect world the next Democratic president would be an aggressive anti Trump. Who would appoint Jack Smith AG. Then tell him to go after all these corrupt clowns.
No he doesn’t. It’s not going to go anywhere since Republicans are in charge
About time with Alito on deck…
I wouldn’t call it “facing”, but sure.
Rep Cohen is retiring because his Memphis seat got carved up due to the overturning of the Voting Rights Act.
So a fitting FU on his way out.
Even though it won’t go anywhere, it’ll be part of Roberts legacy that an impeachment resolution was filed against him.
It isn’t going to go anywhere but that’s probably good because Rump will put in someone far worse.
It’s political! Oh no, John Roberts will be so sad. The poor man detests anything political.
Remove Roberts so trump can appoint someone 30 years younger? Maybe go after the orange turd first.
We need to amend the Court so that an actual code of ethics can be enforced.
It’s no coincidence that public trust in SCOTUS has plummeted on his watch.
Remember that the Senate published a huge report detailing how the Court „allowed a culture of misconduct to metastasize into a full-blown crisis.“
Roberts basically scoffed…
The same guy who has been pushing back for years against criticisms of the Court’s politicization, but was the one who authored Trump’s immunity ruling, and also continues to rule in Trump’s favor on unprecedented numbers of „shadow dockets.“
This is a headline that only matters to people who don’t know how the government works
He doesn’t face anything. The resolution is fundamentally not serious and is obviously DOA in the House.
Why the fuck would this be a good idea? You impeach the chief justice to allow Trump to appoint yet another young cult member? This seems really really fucking short sighted
this would be the worst time to do this.
this is gonna go nowhere fast
Democrats absolutely need to be doing what Republicans did with project 2025 and putting together a comprehensive one might even say vindictive plan for not how to screw people but fundamentally change and reform the system that is so broken this country absolutely needs an update to its system and then out the top of that list should be plans for how to reform the Supreme Court.
Let’s hand another lifetime appointment to Donald Trump and the Heritage Foundation.
It won’t go anywhere…
Good, fuck John Roberts.
Get him and then the other cultist criminal traitors out.
I dont like the timing of this. Its obviously not going to go anywhere and it just gives Republicans fodder for their „extremest liberals“ talking point. It could sway some independents in toss up states. This would have been something that would have been nice to pursue after the dems hopefully won the house. Then it may pick up some traction and would send a message that the dems are willing to fight
The constitution is used to stop Democratic presidents and ignored by Republican ones
This feels dangerous… sure he’s a cheat, but that gives Trump another appointment.
Idk how these „justices“ fucking sleep at night, know full well the destruction of America they’ve enabled.
Great idea, make the Chief Justice role vacant during a trump term…
Cynical leftist viewpoint:and let *Trump* pick the next Chief Justice of the United States?
So impeach an institutionalist who is more likely to side with the liberal justices on issues than most of the conservative justices? And impeach him less than two years into the Trump administration guaranteeing Trump gets to appoint his replacement? It’s a good thing that this resolution stands no chance of passing because this is textbook cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Alito and Thomas are the justices that most need impeaching and not until we have a new administration.
I hope they screw all these scumbags to the wall. What a bunch of grifters and henchmen.
Aileen Cannon about to get a promotion.
We have to protect the country from these people.
You don’t get more partisan than Roberts and you don’t get more corrupt than Thomas.
I don’t like this “tactical impeachment” point of view I see some people have. Like they want Roberts gone because he’s committed impeachable offenses (as of today), but then want to wait x years to do it because a Republican is the president.
If you think he’s done all these horrible things, then get him out ASAP.
*I don’t think this position is completely equivalent with being “holier than thou”, but it shares a lot of similarities.
This is risky. Trump could urge the Republicans to pick this up and ram it through.
Like they did with the “Release the Epstein Files” vote.
If this gets to the Senate, I could see Republicans happily piling on to push this over the two thirds hurdle.
nothing will happen
He’s not even the worst one!
Super annoyed Biden refused to widen the court when he was in office.
Way to rev up the Republicans.
I think the timing on this is bad. It’s telegraphing the punches, it’s showing your hand.
This will result in more weaponized propaganda to bring out Republican voters.
It does nothing right now, has no chance of going anywhere, and should have been held back until after the mid-tetm elections
Stupid idea. Wait until we retake the elements of govt we can and pack the court. Do it fast and no quarter. make Roberts irrelevant instantly. Then use the avenues Trump created and hit it hard, only giving in when the other side agrees to create laws that restrict their collective action.