Die Regierung von Alberta fügt dem Referendum im Herbst eine trennungsbezogene Frage hinzu
https://www.ctvnews.ca/edmonton/article/alberta-government-adds-separation-related-question-to-fall-referendum/
Die Regierung von Alberta fügt dem Referendum im Herbst eine trennungsbezogene Frage hinzu
https://www.ctvnews.ca/edmonton/article/alberta-government-adds-separation-related-question-to-fall-referendum/
10 Kommentare
She’s kicking things down the road. So if people vote yes does that mean the issue is put on the backburner for a long time.
Absolutely phenomenal time to decide that I’m going to quit drinking. ☠️
So after the Courts told them they couldn’t do this, and Albertans clearly said they didn’t want this, and the Government didn’t run on this and get a mandate for it, they are going to ram this through and gamble with the provinces future.
She added the referendum when they didn’t get the votes or was a legal petiition at all.
She said it wasn’t going to happen when she ran for Premier. She lied she needs to be charged immediately.
My democracy in Alberta has been stolen and wrecked by the Conservatives of Alberta.
And not a single Albertan seems to care. Not a Conservative at least. All separatists are traitors and need jail time.
This is nothing like the Quebec separatism. This one is completely being done at the behest of America
So instead of respecting the courts, Smith will be putting the country through absurdity to appease the separatists in her caucus and also appease a very vocal minority.
I can’t say I’m shocked but this type of stuff is just infuriating. Polling has regularly showed that there’s no appetite for separation in Alberta. Further, we have to acknowledge the foreign interference with the voter list data breach and the UCP is silent on it.
Their grievances are literally pipelines which Carney has now given them. That’s pretty much it. I can’t think of a single actual reason they want to separate aside from dog whistles about Ottawa overreach or whatever that’s supposed to mean.
Someone needs to tell these people that if they separate, their pipeline aspirations will become significantly harder than if they remained.
IMO this guarantees that she’s finished as leader of the UCP.
The separatist members that make up a majority of the party are going to feel betrayed. Coincidentally, they also are the same ones that are by far the most engaged and activist members of the party.
She’s done.
Of course the question is confusing. How could anyone know how to agree or disagree to a question that includes both options?
„Should the Government purpose a question on should the government begin the separation question?“
What a fucking joke. This isn’t a separatist referendum, its a referendum on having another referendum sometime in the future.
There’s obviously some wilder stuff happening, but there was some wild historical revisionism on Smith’s part (probably ignorance; there’s no way she actually understands Canadian history) in thinking that Canada started out as a decentralized union of provinces that gradually centralized at Ottawa’s behest, whereas the US was always more centralized. This is completely backwards.
We are going to have a referendum to determine if we should have a referendum at some undefined future date.
The separatists will not be happy and will probably try to take over the party and remove her.
I wonder if she would call a snap election if it looks like they will succeed
Can anyone please tell me how I can vote no on this idiocy if I will not be in the country in October? I really don’t want to just hang out in Canada waiting around for this farce but it’s also fucking important.