Lyft-Fahrer wurde dabei erwischt, wie er offensichtlich Gemini AI (mit Wasserzeichen) nutzte, um Schäden an seinem Auto vorzutäuschen und den Fahrern zusätzliche Reinigungsgebühren in Rechnung zu stellen
https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/lyft-responds-after-driver-uses-ai-to-fake-damage-and-charge-riders-fees-3366551/
28 Kommentare
Lyft can get around that by requiring invoices from a detailer before charging clients.
It was fries and a Coke spilled. Big mess. Then the young girl spotted the watermark of Gemini AI in the corner of the pic. Driver got fired. It never happened. Best to photo any car you are leaving.
I think I saw the Lyft rider who was scammed make a post on reddit. Good to see the scammer getting called out.
Absolute scum behavior trying to steal from children.
Oh no, it’s the genie that came out of the bottle everyone with common sense warned society about, but bottom line was more important. Now the average person can fabricate video, pictures, and audio of anyone and anything with just some words. What could go wrong?
EDIT: Even with water marks, thats only going to stop a small segment of people for so long. There will be a work around like anything on the internet.
Another free point for Waymo.
All this bullshit just so the rich people can get a little richer.
Eventually (and I’m not even going to speculate on a time frame or which government) is going to get fed up enough with people trying this scam they’re going to put a regulation that will ban the automatic charging of any additional fines/fees/damages and require they be manually reviewed and “accepted” by the causer or appealed with the risk or a platform ban/actual litigation if the damage is severe enough and they refuse to pay.
That’s such an easy fix for Lyft, they could just run the photos to Google digital watermark verification tool (SynthID)
Ban that dude from all the ride share platforms. And refer the matter to authorities for wire fraud.
Wow this website is mad for ads.
He should face fraud charges
As someone who got forced into paying some bullshit repair fee for something that I didn’t break, and Lyft did absolutely nothing to investigate or fact check, this has the potential to really run things off the rails
This driver of mine had one of those seat belts that just don’t really retract back in. Idk what causes it, but we’ve all seen it on old cars. As I stepped out he turned and said „oh, careful!“. I was like „what?“, and he just vaguely gestured at the seat belt. Like how is me closing the door impacting that? I walked away.
10 minutes later I was getting charged for a damage fee for allegedly slamming the seat belt in the door. Lyft kept closing my support tickets without responding.
This man has Secretary of Transportation vibes!
This should be referred for criminal investigation. It’s a form of fraud and he should be charged. And lyft did the absolute bare minimum here. Shame on them.
Ive used a rideshare exactly twice in my life and even i know you take before and after pictures.
AI, or the mis-use of it rather, by disinginous people like this guy – are going to cause me to stop using all of these services that are supposed to make my life easier. I work in in tech and despise what AI is doing to end users and people in leadership roles.
This is why when I have rented cars for the past few years I always did a walk around video of the inside and out before locking it and turning the keys in. This is just gonna get worse with how easy AI is to use.
This is a stupid scam due to high risk and low reward.
That’s not the picture of the driver in the thumbnail, it’s the father of the girls who rode in the Lyft.
It’s always scam artists that use this shit.
Holy shit something similar happened to me one time.
My car broke down and I needed to take my new puppy, about 3 months old, to the vet. Like a 20 minute drive. I came prepared. I made sure the puppy went potty right before the trip, brought a big towel to cover the seat and catch any hair, and I held the pup in my lap the entire time. Just because I like dogs, i don’t expect everyone to also want to be around them, and the last thing I wanted was to make someone uncomfortable. Before the driver arrived, I sent ahead a message that I had the puppy with me and asked if that was ok. He said yes. When he arrived, I asked again. Yes again. I totally would have found a different driver if this guy said no (and that actually happened before I got my car back and it was no issue at all).
So he said no problem, I put down the seat cover, got in. Clung to that dog like my life depended on it the entire time, it didn’t set one foot off my lap the entire ride. It did brush its nose against the window when it was looking out, and because dogs have wet noses, it left a smudge, but I wiped that clean. Dude was super friendly the entire time, asking about the puppy, even petting it. I got out, tipped generously, thanked him, went on my way. Took a different Lyft back later, same protocol.
Imagine my shock when the next day, I get a Lyft charge to the tune of 280+ dollars. Dude claims the dog damaged his car – messed up the windows, there’s hair on the seats and there’s pictures of some liquid on the floor mats that absolutely was NOT there when I got out of the car, which he claimed was dog piss. Now, I’m not unreasonable. If my dog really made a mess, I’d have died of embarrassment, apologized profusely, cleaned it up, reimbursed, no questions asked – my dog, my responsibility. But this was some grade A nonsense. After I explained the situation to Lyft, they provided some deeply unimpressive pictures the dude sent to justify the price tag. Lyft shared at least some of my skepticism because after some back and forth, they knocked the cleaning fee from the „heavy damage“ 300-dollar bracket down to like 65. Still a good bit of money but less bad.
I thought I was going crazy. I had no idea this was a genuine scam some people were running.
This has had me thinking. We are so fucked.
Slumlords using it to „prove“ damages.
tenants using it to „prove“ no damages.
People using it to „prove“ more or less damages in accidents.
Customers using it to „prove“ something arrived in the mail broken.
online sellers using it to „prove“ they mailed something they never did.
Small claims courts about to have a field day.
That’s hilarious. I had a rider(lyft) spill red soda on my white seats, leaving the cup as well.
I put in the ticket, as I have before, and got sent 80 bucks for cleaning. I get the cleaning done and confirm that it was done.
I log in a few days later to find that I owe 80 bucks. I contact support, and they tell me the person contested the claim and they sided with the client, despite the evidence, so I need to pay back.
A few months later, another ride spilled an entire can of paint(he was a contractor trying to get to his next job) in my trunk. Support wont help me due to suspected fraud. The guy, who was super nice and felt really bad for not properly securing the lid, was pissed for me. Took my phone chewed them out, which surprised me. Ended up giving me 200 bucks AFTER helping to clean it out. Support wanted a picture of him handing me the money. We were both like wtf dude!
Lyft, Uber, and all the rest exist to make scams like this possible. Their entire business model is premised on deregulation, and with deregulation, this is what you get. AI is partially to blame, but so is the rideshare industry.
Hey, look! A financial return that can be proven!
Even if the photo was real there is no way to prove who was responsible for making this mess. The driver could have caused this and then took a photo and blamed it on their last customer
.
Don’t listen to the execs talking about AI. This is the future use of it