Eine Analyse von 1,63 Milliarden eindeutigen Seite-zu-Seite-Links (Wikilinks) identifizierte die am häufigsten zitierten Artikel in der englischen Wikipedia
Eine Analyse von 1,63 Milliarden eindeutigen Seite-zu-Seite-Links (Wikilinks) identifizierte die am häufigsten zitierten Artikel in der englischen Wikipedia
Most of those don’t „feel“ like citations in the traditional sense. Like, ISBN is at the top because every book _has_ an ISBN number, not because the book has anything to do with ISBN. Most of these are similarly just links to particular catalogs.
I’m not sure how I would filter things to fix this, though.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
2 Kommentare
Top Cited Articles
Data analysis of the English Wikipedia dump files from May 2026 allowed to build ranking of the most cited articles. Here are the top 50 Wikipedia articles, with the number of incoming links (citations) shown in brackets:
[ISBN](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISBN) (1,640,723)
[Geographic coordinate system](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographic_coordinate_system) (1,257,791)
[Digital object identifier](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifier) (711,302)
[Wayback Machine](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayback_Machine) (675,714)
[Wikidata](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikidata) (509,749)
[ISSN](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISSN) (505,509)
[Taxonomy (biology)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxonomy_(biology)) (496,532)
[Global Biodiversity Information Facility](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Biodiversity_Information_Facility)(464,041)
[Time zone](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_zone) (455,438)
[United States](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States) (437,284)
[IMDb](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMDb) (406,083)
[Open Tree of Life](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Tree_of_Life) (399,021)
[Binomial nomenclature](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_nomenclature) (392,021)
[Animal](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal) (376,148)
[Catalogue of Life](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catalogue_of_Life) (368,553)
[Interim Register of Marine and Nonmarine Genera](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interim_Register_of_Marine_and_Nonmarine_Genera) (313,153)
[INaturalist](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INaturalist) (295,815)
[Encyclopedia of Life](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia_of_Life) (275,091)
[Association football](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_football) (274,176)
[Daylight saving time](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time) (273,633)
[Wikispecies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikispecies) (267,809)
[France](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France) (265,679)
[Semantic Scholar](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_Scholar) (253,534)
[OCLC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OCLC) (251,623)
[Record label](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Record_label) (242,084)
[Arthropod](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthropod) (241,604)
[National Center for Biotechnology Information](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Center_for_Biotechnology_Information) (237,741)
[PubMed](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PubMed) (230,779)
[World War II](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II) (227,499)
[Music genre](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_genre) (221,588)
[Pancrustacea](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancrustacea) (216,225)
[Insect](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insect) (214,763)
[Germany](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germany) (214,199)
[United Kingdom](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom) (213,409)
[Record producer](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Record_producer) (200,934)
[The New York Times](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times) (200,715)
[Political party](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_party) (194,625)
[Australia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia) (190,367)
[Italy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italy) (189,720)
[Synonym (taxonomy)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synonym_(taxonomy)) (185,121)
[India](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India) (184,424)
[Bibcode](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibcode) (174,702)
[Integrated Taxonomic Information System](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_Taxonomic_Information_System) (174,431)
[Surname](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surname) (171,530)
[Japan](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan) (168,687)
[Russia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia) (166,259)
[Canada](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada) (165,593)
[Spain](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spain) (162,773)
[UTC+02:00](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTC%2B02:00) (160,743)
[Poland](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poland) (160,034)
Most of those don’t „feel“ like citations in the traditional sense. Like, ISBN is at the top because every book _has_ an ISBN number, not because the book has anything to do with ISBN. Most of these are similarly just links to particular catalogs.
I’m not sure how I would filter things to fix this, though.