Share.

    10 Kommentare

    1. Is anyone familiar with Malta’s parody laws?

      MaltaDaily:

      “Hi there, we came across your page. While we appreciate and support creative content such as memes, the use of our branding may mislead audiences into believing the content you shared is real and was published by Malta Daily.

      Experimenting with intellectual property, and editorial identity that you do not own or have permission to manipulate is completely unacceptable. Both legally and ethically.

      Any unauthorised alteration, reproduction, or simulated use of Malta Daily’s brand assets, trade identity, editorial presentation, or public image, particularly in a political context, exposes you to serious legal liability, including but not limited to trademark infringement, passing off, reputational harm, false association, and misrepresentation.

      You post does not exempt it from liability or make it defensible under satire or fair use principles.

      For this reason, we kindly ask you to remove and refrain from using it in future posts. Please note that the unauthorized use of our brand identity may have legal implications, and we may need to take the necessary steps to protect our brand.

      Best regards,

      Gabriel Mifsud (Founder & CEO Malta Daily)”

    2. Rough-Improvement-24 on

      Taħt il-Labour sess biss u sess spiss, għall-kulħadd. Il-ħolma tiegħek, il-proġett tagħhom.

    3. electric-sheep on

      I’m sorry I’m with them on this one. They got a trademark and they gotta protect it.

    4. I kinda doubt it still falls under paraody law if you just copy their branding 100% but I’m not a lawyer. Would be curious to know if I am wrong actually.

    5. ZXKHYFPYLDRTHH on

      From my point of view this is absolute wrong.

      I would even go to court to stop this.

    6. Fluffy_Cupcakez on

      Parody relates to content, not source. Yours is misattributing source, and misleading people into believing that this content by them. Basically, everything they told you. They are right.

      Also parody has to be clear that it is parody. The content itself… well I’m not sure though it is perhaps far-fetched enough. But the website address is not parody. It’s like a meta-parody where the joke is provenance itself, but how would people know that? Perhaps it truly is a joke post by whoever you are claiming it to be. And that definitely does not fall under any parody law.

    7. Prudent-Scientist-17 on

      To me, an average viewer, this looks more like forgery than parody. There’s nothing in the image at all that could help me identify this as a parody.

    8. Haha I mean they’re only angry because you e jumped Abela on his next policy announcement.. 😂

    Leave A Reply