Share.

    38 Kommentare

    1. But won’t someone think of the true victims here? Israel needs buffer zones for the buffer zone’s buffer zone!

      How else are their illegal settlers going to have security?

      And don’t suggest something silly like simply following international law, Israel has their daddy the United States to make the rules.

    2. zeit_reisender on

      As if labeling Lebanon with ‚Hezbollah‘ or Gaza with ‚Hamas‘ justifies the destruction. Under international law, Lebanon is a sovereign state – Hezbollah is an armed group, not its government. Israel’s attacks on Lebanese territory violate the UN Charter’s prohibition on the use of force and international humanitarian law, especially when targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure.

    3. Sgretolatore on

      I would use a different color for the cities, they looked like enclaves at first glance

    4. Head_of_Based_Dept on

      I’d have painted zone a some colour but besides that it seems pretty accurate

    5. CompetitiveSpace3988 on

      it’s fascinating how maps can spark conversations about complex issues

    6. Ronnie_Reads on

      The Gaza part is a little outdated, since it’s based on where the yellow line originally was, when there was a more 50-50 split between IDF-Hamas control, which is now more like a 60-50 split with IDF taking more ground. There’s some chunks in the southern parts of Gaza for instance that used to be the Hamas-half and are now the IDF-half. But I get that it’s difficult to find updated maps since it keeps changing

    7. Alessandro_Cot on

      **CLARIFICATION**: this is a ***de-facto*** map, meaning that it looks at *how things stand in practice*, including recent occupations, de-facto control, non-state entities, rebels, etc etc etc. A ***de jure*** map, on the other hand, would look at how the borders are *supposed* to be according to the United Nations. You can also look at the de jure map on the website, [https://atlynxmaps.com/](https://atlynxmaps.com/), from which the maps come from. Good afternoon everyone 😉

    8. ferriematthew on

      Damn, the territory controlled by the Palestine part of the region is an absolute mess of exclaves… How the heck do they get anything done

    9. scrapy_the_scrap on

      For the west bank id have seprated zones a b and c by color that way the legality of each settlement is emphesized

    10. Peter_The_Black on

      The map is good, it shows a de facto reality. However… there is no state of Hezbollah or Hamas. Especially when the other names are Israel. palestine and Jordan. This map is very precise and informative but shouldn’t conflate terrorist organisations with states. It especially feels weird in Lebanon which isn’t even named. Also you went through the effort of naming the area in Syria « Suwayda druze insurgency » so with a qualifier, you could have put « Hezbollah controlled lands » in Lebanon. To stay accurate either put Gaza and West Bank, or name both as Palestine. Or pur Likoud/IDF on Israël and Fatah on Palestine. It looks a bit weird to on the one hand show the de facto annexations by Israël yet use a very loaded way of presenting the non-Israeli areas.

      Otherwise great map.

    11. ConceptStrict141 on

      correction: mt scopus is actually undisputed, internationally recognised israeli territory 

    12. I wonder how long it will be until Israel just takes all the Palestinians and dumps them on surrounding countries.

      It feels like it’s gonna happen at some point.

    13. Shouldn’t the Golan Heights be considered occupied territory? Officially it’s still Syrian, but has been occupied by Israel since a while ago.

    14. WolfetoneRebel on

      The zionists are great learners. They took a look at their own tragic history and said “I can do it better”

    15. Acrobatic-Sorbet-222 on

      Cool, Finally a map that shows who controls what.
      Gaza = Hamas
      Lebanon = Hezbollah

      Bless the Druze allies surviving in Syria

    Leave A Reply