Quelle : https://www.justetf.com/en/asset-comparisons/index-comparisons/bitcoin-vs-nasdaq-100

    Die Preisänderung für Bitcoin beträgt 43,8 %, während der Nasdaq um 132,8 % gestiegen ist. Im weiteren Sinne ist die Performance des S+P 500 auch mehr als doppelt so hoch wie die von Bitcoin.

    Quelle : https://www.justetf.com/en/asset-comparisons/index-comparisons/sp-500-vs-bitcoin

    Irgendwie stellt sich die Frage: Was ist mit Bitcoin passiert? Ich denke, die Antwort ist, dass KI bei allem passiert ist.

    https://i.redd.it/7223zlb7jy0h1.png

    Share.

    19 Kommentare

    1. Suspicious-Can-7079 on

      Winter happened? Should we choose a different time frame and jump to conclusions from that as well?

    2. lamp-town-guy on

      You’re basically tracking the AI boom. But most importantly, don’t put all your eggs into one basket and you’ll be fine.

    3. ashleyshaefferr on

      And this is why cherry picking specific dates is stupid. 

      Now do theast 7 years!!! 

      Or the last 10 years!!!

      Or the last 15 years!!

    4. Depending on what start point and end point you pick, you’ll get wildly different results. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this comparison is that BTC is more volatile than a market index, and that the stock market is more predictable than crypto.

    5. Aside from the ai boom and btc being in winter, this is all relative to around the btc ath in 2021. What a joke of a post. Couldnt cherry pick any harder

    6. That’s why it’s good to diversify. You never know what the markets are going to do.

    7. the_pwnererXx on

      The crypto bubble is over. You guys are fighting over the scraps. All the real money was made in 2017

    8. banananuhhh on

      If you wait 3 more weeks and do this exercise again (assuming no big change to Nasdaq or BTC price), BTC will come out favorably.

    9. the 5-year Nasdaq-vs-BTC outperformance is partially the marketing-cycle inversion of the 10-year comparison. extend the window to 8-10 years and BTC dominates on absolute returns, sharpe is more contested but BTC isn’t far behind. the cleaner takeaway is that the relative outperformance depends heavily on the start date you choose, which is true for any pair of risk assets. neither is a substitute for the other in a portfolio context

    10. cryptogodlight on

      80% drawdowns for a 1 – 2x gain in 2025. Meanwhile stocks are printing god candles non stop.

      This truly is a terrible market when you twke off the rosey shades. S&p out performing btc also.

    11. ljungbergsghost on

      Everybody hates the word Ponzi scheme and bitcoin is clearly way too big to be a classic Ponzi scheme, but there is no doubt that as in all pyramid type investments where the asset you buy has no value other than what someone will pay for it later, the people that got in early and buy that I mean before 2015 make a lot of money. As the asset matures, the returns become more routine and slow slowly, are passed by the next up-and-coming idea. In the end, this is a 2009 technology project that is 16 years old and its returns are now behaving just like every other investment in the history of mankind. It is not a special game changer. The days of 50x are over.

    12. Choice_Potato_6279 on

      $1.5T marketcap is too much for a novelty thing that barerly anyone uses, people don’t realize how much crypto is overpriced, AMD is worth x2 less while being the backbone of computers and servers.

    Leave A Reply