Weiße supremacistische Ideen dringen in die kanadischen Medien und Politik ein
https://thetyee.ca/Analysis/2026/05/06/White-Supremacist-Ideas-Canadian-Media-Politics/
Weiße supremacistische Ideen dringen in die kanadischen Medien und Politik ein
https://thetyee.ca/Analysis/2026/05/06/White-Supremacist-Ideas-Canadian-Media-Politics/
6 Kommentare
> The National Post’s review of the book acknowledges that the novel is “generally considered a racist book towards Indians.” But **the bulk of the piece is devoted to arguing the book’s ideas and warnings about “third-world migration” have merit and should be more widely read.**
> …a professor of French and francophone studies at the Catholic University of America, described **the novel’s key themes as “white supremacy and the end of white civilization as the West knows it — infestation, invasion**…
> The review also expresses concern that the book is not stocked in Canadian libraries…
Legitimately shocking that NatPo pushing that book wasn’t a bigger deal.
As always, it’s hard to overstate the damage we let a foreign media conglomerate do to our national discourse.
Not sure NatPo covered it yet, id be surprised if they didnt, but Daily Mail picked up the new Governor Generals comments when she was involved in doing a review of the toxicity in our armed forces and said its full of white boys that love guns and hate women.
And that, of course, set some folks off. Its always kind of fascinating that racism and misogyny is accepted by them as gospel but calling it out causes the perpetrators to pearl clutch as if you spit on their first born.
The cofounder of the white nationalist group Dominion Society of Canada had an [explicit goal](https://www.antihate.ca/remigration_white_nationalists_repackaging_ethnic_cleansing) to make Pollievre use the word „remigration“ by the end of 2025. There’s a concentrated effort to normalize this rhetoric.
Contrarian take: Jen St. Denis‘ article may actually streisand effect the heck out of Eby’s objection to Tara Armstrong’s comparison of DRIPA’s concept of land claims‘ similarity to the nazi „blood and soil“ rhetoric. Considering our federal LPC managed to get an actual elderly nazi veteran onto the parliament floor for a standing ovation, feigning outrage about an opposition MLA sanity-checking DRIPA vs. nazi rhetoric seems counter-productive.
. . .“Entering?“
Does no one remember Poilievre’s use of „Anglo Saxon words,“ his anti-indigenous, anti-woke, anti-BLM statements, his support of the convoy organized by Pat „white replacement theory“ King and Chris „nazi and confederate flags hung proudly in my garage“ Barber?
Sure. This is totally new. Shock and awe. Gasp. Someone give me a raise so I can afford some pearls in this economy so I can give them a proper clutching.
He’s been courting this „base“ for years.
Tara Armstrong invoked „blood and soil“ to *say that’s a bad ideology.* She was not promoting the concept.
Saying that is somehow an instance of white supremacy entering politics is ridiculous.