Menschen erleben die stärkste romantische Eifersucht, wenn sie zusehen, wie ihr Partner Ressourcen an einen potenziellen Rivalen weitergibt, unabhängig vom Geschlecht. Die Ergebnisse belegen, dass das Verschenken von Ressourcen sowohl von Männern als auch von Frauen als ernsthafte Beziehungsbedrohung angesehen wird.
Both men and women view a partner’s financial investment in a rival as a major relationship threat
21 Kommentare
Both men and women view a partner’s financial investment in a rival as a major relationship threat
A recent study published in the journal Evolution and Human Behavior suggests that people experience the strongest romantic jealousy when they watch their partner give resources to a potential rival, regardless of gender. The findings provide evidence that giving away resources is viewed as a serious relationship threat by both men and women. This research highlights how our emotional alarm systems react more strongly to a partner’s active investment in someone else rather than a partner passively receiving attention.
The data revealed that the investment scenario caused the highest levels of jealousy for all participants. Both men and women felt highly threatened when their partner actively gave money to a rival. “We found that a romantic partner allocating more resources to a stranger than oneself is a situation that produces jealousy, regardless of gender,” Fernández said.
The researchers noted that actively giving money requires thought, intention, and sacrifice. Because of this, both men and women interpreted the investment scenario as a major warning sign of a partner slipping away. The anticipated gender differences did not fully emerge in the receiving scenario.
The researchers predicted that men would become much more jealous than women when their partner received money from a rival. Instead, men and women displayed very similar, relatively low levels of jealousy in this situation. “We got a weaker effect when trying to model male jealousy by the partner receiving resources from an opposite sex stranger, although we made it explicit that the partner accepted these resources,” Fernández explained.
The scientists noted that passively receiving money might not send a strong signal of sexual betrayal. A partner might accept resources from a rival just to gain a free benefit, which does not necessarily mean they are sexually interested in the rival. To ensure the jealousy was specifically about their own romantic relationship, the researchers also included several control scenarios.
In these control rounds, participants watched random strangers give or receive money. By including these extra scenarios, the scientists could verify that the jealousy stemmed from a direct threat to the participant’s own romantic bond. “Other than the generalized jealousy at third-party allocation, we found that some of the control conditions indicate that jealousy was not elicited simply by observing unequal allocations or interactions with opposite-sex others,” Fernández pointed out.
She added that the feeling was very specific to relationship threats. “Rather, jealousy was strongest when the resource movement carried a clear relational threat: for women, the partner’s allocation of resources to a female rival,” Fernández observed. A subtle gender difference did appear during the control scenarios.
Women reported feeling jealous when they watched any committed man give money to a single woman, even if that man was a total stranger. This provides evidence that women might be generally more vigilant about the ways men distribute resources, treating it as a broad social warning sign. Finally, individual personality traits played a significant role in the emotional reactions.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513825001655
I knew something was up when she traded her 3 wheat for only 2 stone.
So basically buying someone else lunch is a declaration of war
Their definition of a rival is extremely vague. Why would (all) strangers be perceived as (potential) rivals equally? Seems like no social context is applied whatsoever.
>actively giving money requires thought, intention, and sacrifice.
Also don’t agree with this statement. In terms of gift giving – giving money requires the **least amount** of thought, intention, and sacrifice. Because buying a gift in any scenario requires additional levels and investment of „thought, intention, and sacrifice“ as they are not only spending their money but also new levels of their time and energy which are needed to choose and purchase a gift. I’d wager people would get more jealous when a partner gives a gift in the same value than just the monetary equivalent, because it would signal additional levels of interest.
Weird study…
>*The scientists asked participants to complete questionnaires about their personal relationship insecurities.*
And how many participant had run away; how many relationships ended; how many researchers were smacked in the face; and where is my money.
Well, if you think life is a ranking board and you base your own self worth on the basis where you are placed in it, then you will see your partner you admire choosing you as a measure of your worth, therefore you will feel your position is not as solid, when you realize you partner can also choose someone else.
Most people are insecure and treat being chosen by someone as a backbone of their self worth, then project anger stemming from their insecurities on their partner.
They need to study more couples, this sounds like total hogwash to me. Granted, I think there are many factors at play that likely aren’t being considered in this study. If my wife is giving away resources to someone else, she has my total support and likely an excellent reason for doing so.
I feel like this even with friends or family, like a sudden strike of jealousy that goes away just as quickly. It’s strange, but I think it may be a more tribal instinct than romantic?
[removed]
The boundaries between friendships and relationships varies from person to person and what we think should be prioritised for a partner may be insignificant for someone else
and IMO this is relevant to love languages, I feel appreciated through physical closeness so I get easily jealous when there’s someone separating me from my partner even if the situation is innocent
likewise, time spent together doesn’t mean much for me but i have had partners feel anxious because i spent more time with friends than them even if the activity is mundane
and the issue is for a lot of us we irrationally expect partners to know this intuitively and if they don’t it feels like „they don’t understand me“
IMO once you know what makes people feel loved and how they express it, you become better at identifying whether a situation is innocent or not
Does it not depend on the resources?
Minerals? I can look the other way.
Vespin gas? No way…
Interesting. But my first thought when I thought of ‚giving resources‘ was TIME as the resource. Because that’s the resource I was FAR more jealous of my ex giving away to others than I was of money.
Somewhat Malthusian, no one likes to compete for resources.
Anytime one of these studies comes out I always think to myself how arrogant most people are because they seperate themselves from animals when these studies time and time again prove that at our core we are still just simple animals.
„Skyler, where is the money?“
Gee, and here I thought it was when they caught them in flagrante delecto.
I was just reading a BORU the other day where a poly „couple“ was having issues where the man wanted to impregnate his girlfriend, upon which her plan was to move away and raise the child alone (basically just saving costs on IVF). The poly wife threw a huge fit over this plan, and I was just kind of mystified. THIS is your bridge too far?
Anyway this post makes it make a bit more sense.
Let me give you all a first hand example. A wife was walking through the mall with her kids when a kiosk salesman stopped her.
“You look like a hair model,” he said, smiling as he held up an expensive hair straightener.
Now, this woman hated doing her hair. For years, she had worn it pulled tightly into the same bun every day. But for fifteen minutes, the salesman praised her, flirted with her, and styled her hair right there in front of her children.
By the time she left, she hadn’t bought one straightener. She had bought two, for $300.
That evening, she came home and anxiously told her husband how this new straightener was going to change everything. She was finally going to start doing her hair.
Her husband listened quietly. He knew his wife. He knew no magical tool was going to make her suddenly love styling her hair.
Then the kids walked in and filled in the missing details. They told him about the man at the mall who kept saying Mom looked like a hair model while he did her hair.
The husband felt jealous, but not just because another man had flirted with his wife. He was upset that she had spent their money chasing the feeling of being admired in front of their kids.
And sure enough, a year passed.
The life-changing straighteners were never used once.
TLDR:
Having someone flirt with your wife as she walks by and you’re not there is actually fine. Having your wife stop and listen to a man flirt with her for 15 minutes is troubling. Paying $300 dollars to be flirted with for 15 minutes is an entirely different level and insulting.
So if my wife is banging some other dude, I should be cool unless she’s also buying him breakfast?
I get a free staff meal and usually give it to the bartender that has to pay for their food. My wife is gonna be so pissed bout them resources unless the psychology of it all is ok with trades?
Also, laughing with another guy, „I guess she doesn’t like me then“