[OC] 20 Gesundheitsinspektoren des LA County, gleiche Postleitzahl in der Innenstadt. 9 haben in 3 Jahren nie eine Zwei gegeben. Das strengste Unternehmen vergab bei fast jedem dritten Besuch die Note B oder C.
Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, public routine retail food inspection records, 2023–2026 (~100k inspections). Filtered to zip 90012, inspectors with >20 routine inspections in that zip.
Tools: Python (pandas), matplotlib.
Disclosure: I work on a side project that uses LA County’s public inspection data. Not linking it here.
loggywd on
I’m surprised they made this data public. Not a good look for the county.
chemicalmamba on
Are these all the same restaurants? How many total restaurants (including repeats) show up in this? It definitely seems concerning, but it could be that a new mall or something opened and the inspections that included a larger share of the new restaurants had more low grades. The time distribution of this matters.
Egrizzzzz on
Wonder if they’ve got a handful of guys they send specifically to catch clever offenders that are good at hiding violations.
spaceporter on
Inspector 20 earned the least money over that period.
murrrdith on
I managed grocery stores for years and it is wild how inconsistent different health inspectors can be.
We had one guy who showed up in jeans and a hoodie, took a 10-minute walk, told us to fix one thing and didn’t write anything on the report.
The next year, we had a new guy who spent 3 hours in the store finding every tiny violation he could.
During that inspection, a vendor was unloading a pallet that had raw eggs on top of ready to eat foods, which is a violation. We rejected the load. He still took points off for “storing raw items above ready to eat foods”.
VealOfFortune on
Gee I i wonder if corruption is at play here 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Westcork1916 on
They might be assigned to specific areas. Some inspectors may be assigned to hotels, and others assigned to food carts or Crypto Arena.
TenaciousLilMonkey on
Inspectors 19 & 20 weren’t interested in the bribe!
punkass_book_jockey8 on
I worked in several restaurants. I never knew if we were getting the one who didn’t care or the one who tested the dish water temp twice with two different thermometers. Seems like this is universal.
Tinosdoggydaddy on
I smell a scandal….like cash paying off inspectors type scandal
Juls7243 on
And…. what does this data mean? What should I learn from it?
I look at this chart and it means nothing, except the distribution of inspector grades. Like – did inspector 20 do a better job than inspector 1 (whose work more accurately reflected the truth)? Or was the opposite true? Despite the same zip code, ultimately did inspect different locations at different times? Is this variation in inspector scores expected or not? Do they accurately reflect differences in restaurant quality? Are different inspectors trained to go after different types of restaurants and this is representative of another trend?
openfolio_dave on
I guess that’s a good thing? Maybe pthe inspections are working. If you get a B or a C aren’t there remediation requirements?
Of course LA is a different city, but the LA data sounds statistically impossible to occur naturally. 100% convinced either incompetence or corruption is at play.
There’s no data in this chart that evaluates any inspector as being more or less strict than another. it’s just a distribution of grades they’ve issued.
discodropper on
Would love to see the scale. You say “nearly 1/3rd” but it looks like it could be 1/4, maybe 1/5. Hell, how do I even know that’s linear? Data may be beautiful, but is meaningless if you don’t have a metric and units.
vt2022cam on
Ideally, you don’t want to force every business with a violation to close and want to work with them on remediation. That’s not what’s happening here. Free meals are more likely.
frogspa on
Reminds me of Ethan Coen’s great short story „Gates of Eden“ from the collection of the same name.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
19 Kommentare
Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, public routine retail food inspection records, 2023–2026 (~100k inspections). Filtered to zip 90012, inspectors with >20 routine inspections in that zip.
Tools: Python (pandas), matplotlib.
Disclosure: I work on a side project that uses LA County’s public inspection data. Not linking it here.
I’m surprised they made this data public. Not a good look for the county.
Are these all the same restaurants? How many total restaurants (including repeats) show up in this? It definitely seems concerning, but it could be that a new mall or something opened and the inspections that included a larger share of the new restaurants had more low grades. The time distribution of this matters.
Wonder if they’ve got a handful of guys they send specifically to catch clever offenders that are good at hiding violations.
Inspector 20 earned the least money over that period.
I managed grocery stores for years and it is wild how inconsistent different health inspectors can be.
We had one guy who showed up in jeans and a hoodie, took a 10-minute walk, told us to fix one thing and didn’t write anything on the report.
The next year, we had a new guy who spent 3 hours in the store finding every tiny violation he could.
During that inspection, a vendor was unloading a pallet that had raw eggs on top of ready to eat foods, which is a violation. We rejected the load. He still took points off for “storing raw items above ready to eat foods”.
Gee I i wonder if corruption is at play here 🤔🤔🤔🤔
They might be assigned to specific areas. Some inspectors may be assigned to hotels, and others assigned to food carts or Crypto Arena.
Inspectors 19 & 20 weren’t interested in the bribe!
I worked in several restaurants. I never knew if we were getting the one who didn’t care or the one who tested the dish water temp twice with two different thermometers. Seems like this is universal.
I smell a scandal….like cash paying off inspectors type scandal
And…. what does this data mean? What should I learn from it?
I look at this chart and it means nothing, except the distribution of inspector grades. Like – did inspector 20 do a better job than inspector 1 (whose work more accurately reflected the truth)? Or was the opposite true? Despite the same zip code, ultimately did inspect different locations at different times? Is this variation in inspector scores expected or not? Do they accurately reflect differences in restaurant quality? Are different inspectors trained to go after different types of restaurants and this is representative of another trend?
I guess that’s a good thing? Maybe pthe inspections are working. If you get a B or a C aren’t there remediation requirements?
There is a study in Tennessee looking at scores from health inspectors : [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3323064/](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3323064/)
The median score being 82.
Of course LA is a different city, but the LA data sounds statistically impossible to occur naturally. 100% convinced either incompetence or corruption is at play.
https://preview.redd.it/6bwf8ogunryg1.jpeg?width=764&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=51290039289fe649be6a046a4e98aa9efcc3d8b3
Always sort with the “bad” results on top
There’s no data in this chart that evaluates any inspector as being more or less strict than another. it’s just a distribution of grades they’ve issued.
Would love to see the scale. You say “nearly 1/3rd” but it looks like it could be 1/4, maybe 1/5. Hell, how do I even know that’s linear? Data may be beautiful, but is meaningless if you don’t have a metric and units.
Ideally, you don’t want to force every business with a violation to close and want to work with them on remediation. That’s not what’s happening here. Free meals are more likely.
Reminds me of Ethan Coen’s great short story „Gates of Eden“ from the collection of the same name.