Väter, die Angst vor einer Scheidung haben, entwickeln im Laufe der Zeit tendenziell ein größeres Misstrauen gegenüber politischen Institutionen. Die subjektive Angst vor familiärer Instabilität kann zu einer größeren Unzufriedenheit mit der Regierung führen. Dies verdeutlicht eine einzigartige Quelle politischer Unzufriedenheit unter Männern.
Fathers who fear divorce are more likely to develop distrust in political institutions
23 Kommentare
Fathers who fear divorce are more likely to develop distrust in political institutions
A recent study published in Acta Sociologica suggests that partnered fathers who worry about an impending divorce tend to develop greater distrust in political institutions over time. The research indicates that the subjective fear of family instability can spill over into a broader dissatisfaction with government actors. These findings highlight a unique source of political disaffection among men, shifting the focus away from traditional economic explanations.
Men in stable relationships who have children and a high level of education typically develop greater political trust as the years pass. However, when these highly educated fathers perceived a risk of divorce, this positive trend vanished. For fathers with lower levels of education, the passing of another year with relationship anxiety actively drove their political trust downward.
For those interested, here’s the link to the peer reviewed journal article:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00016993261429680
I would then ask if this disaffection stems from a loss of control, with the government perceived as the enforcer of that loss.
Anyone who trusts the government at all is a fool. Thats an objective truth in 2026. You dont need government grants and research to figure that out.
As a highly educated father who is in no way in fear of divorce I still have no trust in political institutions.
I think the only thing indicative of having political trust in institutions with the current state of things is naivity and/or ignorance
With everything you hear about husbands getting screwed in divorces and custody battles I can’t say I’m surprised they feel that way
Not hard to understand why when seeing how a lot of decent good fathers/husbands can get brutally screwed over by family court.
I definitely have seen the phenomenon of the „family court dad“ effect on political engagement.
I think if they were more focused on being a better husband and/or father, they wouldn’t have to be worried about divorce.
sure, i can see that. partially because you can do everything you think is right and still get screwed over.
and theres nothing you can do about that.
also as a divorced man everyone makes you the villain.
Anecdotal evidence, n=1. I feel like the state is punishing me and rewarding my ex for my success that occurred despite her behavior. The level of cold, unflinching unfairness has given me incredible dissatisfaction with the state.
But are there any reasons to think this effect is limited to trust in the government rather than overall trust in other people? Similarly, any reasons to think there is a causal relation rather than a confounder?
How many fathers are the source of family instability?
Being awfully cavalier with causality.
Men with antisocial opinions -> more likely to be in a situation where the relationship falls apart.
OR
The relationship falls apart -> develop antisocial opinions.
I think it’s probably likely that the relationship runs in both directions.
Of course this is just based on three surveys and some fancy math, so it’s barely more rigorous than a fanfic.
Fathers who fear divorce usually have a reason to, and those who have a reason to tend to view women abd children a certain way, and those who do that tend to vote for certain authoritarian assholes.
Is this just a political sub?
This is why we refer to conservative men as having divorced dad politics.
There is a strong sense among the manosphere that divorce courts are biased against men, especially with regard to child custody. As a family therapist, my experience is that courts generally want fathers to be a part of their children’s lives, often to a fault; sometimes, abusive fathers are allowed to maintain contact long past the point where it is healthy for the children. Now, obviously, there are definitely cases of men getting „screwed“ by the court system, especially if their ex has an aggressive lawyer and they do not, but the default in most states is joint legal custody for divorced couples, with primary physical custody going to the parent who has been the most involved in the kids‘ lives (which is typically, but not always, the mother) and visitation being ordered for the non-custodial parent. Both parents typically retain legal custody, which usually means, for example, that they can both make medical decisions independently for their children (though some states and some arrangements require consent of both parents). Obviously, every case is different.
I think that some of these men are driven by a profound sense of grievance against their former spouses, whether justified or unjustified. They see the courts and family services acting in their slow, imperfect way and conclude that the system is stacked against them. The online manosphere reinforces and hardens this attitude. Add that to the fact that some men have genuine stories of being „screwed“ by the system, and you have an environment that breeds distrust of the system as a whole.
Who are these men who have trust in government institutions? Children?
I don’t see that the study really controlled for the direction of causality. As one of many different scenarios, if a man is arrested for domestic abuse things can spiral: unfair or perceived unfair treatment by govt (police, judges, social workers), and woman is getting fed up, you have a system which feeds off of everything. AND everyone involved can be objectively correct. For the same reason that when they first fell in love the world was wonderful. Ever seen the Out-Of-Towners? Things tend to beget.
Domestic Relations is where most men discover they don’t actually have any rights.
Maybe it is the other way around? Maybe distrust in institutions (like marriage) leads to distrust in other institutions (like government).
Don’t at all buy that there is a causal link. People who are dissatisfied with their marriage may easily have an unobserved characteristic that also makes them likely to be dissatisfied with other stuff, including politics. It may also be the case that some external economic shock simultaneously increases marital distress and political distrust. Also, the fact that this study only finds a statistically significant correlation for fathers, not mothers, nor even husbands in general, is a red flag to me of p-hacking.
Does it have something to do with unfair to men family lows?