Share.

2 Kommentare

  1. > Queen Elizabeth’s ‚legacy is locked in‘

    Which legacy is that?

    The one where she inherited centuries of stolen colonial wealth and the largest estate on earth, to be maintained by the income of what should be public land until the day she died?

    The one where she intervened in the democratic process to exempt all that land from environmental regulations?

    The one where she presided over systematic torture and concentration camps in Kenya and never said a word?

    The one where she spent millions of dollars she never earned to protect her child rapist son?

  2. No_Magazine9625 on

    QE2’s legacy gets worse and worse with every passing month and more and more revelations that come out about Epstein/Andrew. It’s now clear that she protected and enabled Andrew’s behavior for decades, letting him run rampant and effectively treat Buckingham/Windsor Palace as a brothel debasing the monarchy in the process. She was a do nothing monarch her entire tenure, doing nothing but sitting in silence when it came to addressing things like human rights violations, colonial abuses, etc.

    She was a weak monarch whose only accomplishment was longevity (which you could more aptly describe as squatting on the institution of the monarchy for 7+ decades), and now bears a disgraced legacy. We should strongly consider stripping her name off buildings, hospitals and highways the same way we stripped Andrew’s name off everything already.

Leave A Reply