This study of other facilities in start up suggest flaring is ~3x during the start up years, and up to ~7% of total capacity could be flared in the start up phase versus about ~2% afterwards.
So for LNG Canada, with their annual ~ 500 bcf capacity, you would expect flaring in the range of 36 bcf. The fact they are flaring „just“ ~ 12.25 bcf is on the low end of start up flaring.
lol_ohwow on
What a joke. Makes the whole Churchill MB Pipeline LNG port by 2030 discussion from earlier this week seem even funnier.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
3 Kommentare
Can we get a reliable news source for this story? Also, one that doesn’t require my email information to read it?
Start up flaring is expected to be high and excessive. It’s not fully accounted for in regualtory schemes but it’s a known fact
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12490014/
This study of other facilities in start up suggest flaring is ~3x during the start up years, and up to ~7% of total capacity could be flared in the start up phase versus about ~2% afterwards.
So for LNG Canada, with their annual ~ 500 bcf capacity, you would expect flaring in the range of 36 bcf. The fact they are flaring „just“ ~ 12.25 bcf is on the low end of start up flaring.
What a joke. Makes the whole Churchill MB Pipeline LNG port by 2030 discussion from earlier this week seem even funnier.