Would it have been so hard to have the headline be „Foreign-owned solar farms attacked by Norfolk’s Green“? There’s no way the BBC didn’t know exactly what they were doing. Shame on them.
HMWYA on
It’s interesting, because, beyond the massively dishonest headline ignoring the fact her actual issue with the solar farm is it being a foreign-owned company profiteering, this is also hidden late into the article.
“East Pye has faced strong opposition from politicians in the other main parties on the council including the Conservatives, Labour, Liberal Democrats and Reform UK.”
Weird to single out one party in the headline when there’s local cross-party agreement on this, which would suggest there’s more specific local issues at play as to why they may all be against this.
Dimmo17 on
Seems like people don’t understand how NIMBYism operates. You find a popular reason ( in this case some nice economic nationalism ) to block a project.
There is nothing stopping us ALSO building community owned projects and having local profits in ADDITION to foreign investment, to help accelerate our decarbonisation.
Anyone siding with her are useful mugs for the NIMBY games and slowing down the energy transition to the benefit of fossil fuel lobby. We will need domestic and foreign investment to get off fossil fuels asap, Greens pretend that there’s no trade offs or international collaboration to be done because they are not serious about tough decisions to be made for climate change. Hence why they block pylons, solar farms, anti-nuclear etc.
callsignhotdog on
Nationally, Greens are „Tax the rich, abolish landlords, windmills EVERYWHERE“ but locally there’s still a lot of „Protect the village green, no new infrastructure“ rural middle class types. This divide is what the last leadership contest was about, and the Tax the Rich Greens won under Polanski, and it’s boosted their national popularity a lot because that’s a voting bloc that’s been looking for a home since Corbyn, but they didn’t purge the Village Greens the way Labour purged it’s Corbynites so the divide still exists at the local level of the party.
lwbyomp on
If it can be UK owned & funded, esp profits going back into UK: companies, institutions & people (lower costs) then that should be the model we look to implement.
Thatchers privatisation & destruction of national infrastructure is ruinous for UK & is a model never to be followed again – it is designed to profit a select few & indebt the financial liabilities & burden on the UK tax payers, never again.
KefferLekker02 on
I wouldn’t want solar farms owned by Macquarie either after their operation of Thames Water in recent years…
SavageRabbitX on
And they are anti nuclear as well which is stupid as hell
Bbrhuft on
How much damage was done, how many solar panels were destroyed, did they arrest them? Reads article, oh.
Green party wants to incentivise the acceptance of large solar farm projects by getting solar farm owners to pay back to the local community, and perhaps scale back huge solar farms that people might object to. And if there’s decrease in size of large solar farms, not to worry, this can be offset by encouraging people to put solar panels on the roofs of their own homes, so the total area / energy provided can be the same, or even greater anyway.
All sensible stuff.
sjw_7 on
I read the headline and grabbed my pitch fork then I read the article and put it back again.
She isn’t against the solar farms but is just against them being foreign owned instead of UK owned. I am with her on this as there is simply no reason things like this cant be built and paid for by the UK tax payer and have us benefit from cheaper energy prices and keeping the profits in the UK.
CarlxtosWay on
When the Greens who hate foreign ownership realise rejoining the EU requires freedom of movement of people, goods, services…and capital they are going to be extremely disappointed.
Wonderful_Welder9660 on
Anyone seen „Dirty Business“?
This is a Macquarie-owned venture and I want them out of the UK completely
They have already damaged the UK infrastructure severely and they must be stopped
The government should be building and operating solar and wind. If it’s profitable enough for scum like Macquarie it’s a good investment for the UK government to do it instead
mikethet on
Greens and Reform are 2 sides of the same insanity coin.
AbjectBug759 on
It’ll be Austrian-owned by an investment company, similar to our gas network when National Grid sold it off.
Its just profiting from our energy use and I fully understand and support keeping it within the UK
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
13 Kommentare
Would it have been so hard to have the headline be „Foreign-owned solar farms attacked by Norfolk’s Green“? There’s no way the BBC didn’t know exactly what they were doing. Shame on them.
It’s interesting, because, beyond the massively dishonest headline ignoring the fact her actual issue with the solar farm is it being a foreign-owned company profiteering, this is also hidden late into the article.
“East Pye has faced strong opposition from politicians in the other main parties on the council including the Conservatives, Labour, Liberal Democrats and Reform UK.”
Weird to single out one party in the headline when there’s local cross-party agreement on this, which would suggest there’s more specific local issues at play as to why they may all be against this.
Seems like people don’t understand how NIMBYism operates. You find a popular reason ( in this case some nice economic nationalism ) to block a project.
There is nothing stopping us ALSO building community owned projects and having local profits in ADDITION to foreign investment, to help accelerate our decarbonisation.
Anyone siding with her are useful mugs for the NIMBY games and slowing down the energy transition to the benefit of fossil fuel lobby. We will need domestic and foreign investment to get off fossil fuels asap, Greens pretend that there’s no trade offs or international collaboration to be done because they are not serious about tough decisions to be made for climate change. Hence why they block pylons, solar farms, anti-nuclear etc.
Nationally, Greens are „Tax the rich, abolish landlords, windmills EVERYWHERE“ but locally there’s still a lot of „Protect the village green, no new infrastructure“ rural middle class types. This divide is what the last leadership contest was about, and the Tax the Rich Greens won under Polanski, and it’s boosted their national popularity a lot because that’s a voting bloc that’s been looking for a home since Corbyn, but they didn’t purge the Village Greens the way Labour purged it’s Corbynites so the divide still exists at the local level of the party.
If it can be UK owned & funded, esp profits going back into UK: companies, institutions & people (lower costs) then that should be the model we look to implement.
Thatchers privatisation & destruction of national infrastructure is ruinous for UK & is a model never to be followed again – it is designed to profit a select few & indebt the financial liabilities & burden on the UK tax payers, never again.
I wouldn’t want solar farms owned by Macquarie either after their operation of Thames Water in recent years…
And they are anti nuclear as well which is stupid as hell
How much damage was done, how many solar panels were destroyed, did they arrest them? Reads article, oh.
Green party wants to incentivise the acceptance of large solar farm projects by getting solar farm owners to pay back to the local community, and perhaps scale back huge solar farms that people might object to. And if there’s decrease in size of large solar farms, not to worry, this can be offset by encouraging people to put solar panels on the roofs of their own homes, so the total area / energy provided can be the same, or even greater anyway.
All sensible stuff.
I read the headline and grabbed my pitch fork then I read the article and put it back again.
She isn’t against the solar farms but is just against them being foreign owned instead of UK owned. I am with her on this as there is simply no reason things like this cant be built and paid for by the UK tax payer and have us benefit from cheaper energy prices and keeping the profits in the UK.
When the Greens who hate foreign ownership realise rejoining the EU requires freedom of movement of people, goods, services…and capital they are going to be extremely disappointed.
Anyone seen „Dirty Business“?
This is a Macquarie-owned venture and I want them out of the UK completely
They have already damaged the UK infrastructure severely and they must be stopped
The government should be building and operating solar and wind. If it’s profitable enough for scum like Macquarie it’s a good investment for the UK government to do it instead
Greens and Reform are 2 sides of the same insanity coin.
It’ll be Austrian-owned by an investment company, similar to our gas network when National Grid sold it off.
Its just profiting from our energy use and I fully understand and support keeping it within the UK