Gericht entscheidet, dass Trans-Menschen Anspruch auf korrekte Ausweise haben: „Trans-Diskriminierung ist Diskriminierung aufgrund des Geschlechts“

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2026/04/court-rules-trans-people-have-right-to-accurate-ids-trans-discrimination-is-discrimination/

Share.

26 Kommentare

  1. Wonderful-Pause1048 on

    It’s nice to see that someone in the U.S. is setting the record straight.

  2. Crazy people filing emergency petition to get SCOTUS to overturn it in 3, 2, 1…

  3. GOP: “We’re sexist, too. Stop telling us our sexism and bigotry is wrong! We have a First Amendment right to not hear your criticism! Please, government, protect our bigotry!”

  4. Romantic_Piscean on

    As a trans American, I continue to believe the matter is easily solvable by removing all sex and gender markers from passports, driver’s licenses, official IDs, etc., where identifying you does not need to involve a genital check. In the hospital, providers need a inventory check, but this ID data is information that simply serves no purpose. Legal name, legal address, date of birth, does the photo look like you. That’s all you need. Can we just have an issue, one issue, related to the trans community where a freaking adult is in charge?!

  5. RaisinOverall9586 on

    I don’t even understand MAGAs end game with this.

    If a transwoman has an ID that says „Male“ on it, and someone questions them about it, they can just say, „It’s because I’m a transwoman, and I legally have to have ‚male‘ on my ID.“

    What is the other person gonna do in that situation? If they’re at an airport, are they gonna *not* let them fly because they’re trans? If they get pulled over by the cops, are they going to get a ticket for being trans? I just don’t understand what the „gotcha“ here is for MAGA or how it helps them in any way.

  6. SomeGalNamedAshley on

    Meanwhile in The Free State Of Florida….

    (Yes, they actually put that on a sign as you enter the state.)

  7. If gender was removed from the drivers license…doesn’t this become a non issue?

  8. So is the court saying gender and sex are the same thing?

    My ID says “sex”, not “gender”.

  9. GimmeDatSideHug on

    Watch conservative bigots get more upset over this than bombing a school full of children and teachers.

  10. BoredomFestival on

    (1) The idea that your gender is in any way relevant to identity documents is absurd.

    (2) Why do people obsess so much over the shape of other people’s junk.

  11. ketchupbreakfest on

    My fundamental belief is the only person who needs to know anything about my ASAB is the person im sleeping with and my drs.

    Thats it.

  12. Hey Patriots, WE The People means Everyone. We’re tired of the constant culture war and erosion of human rights.

  13. Honest-Situation-738 on

    And we still have some fuckstick in the MT AG’s office who wants to behave as if intersex people simply don’t exist. This is an issue that should only present an actionable difference in treatment between individuals and their doctors/nurses, and nowhere else.

    > The Montana Attorney General’s Office, on the other hand, expressed outrage in an anti-trans statement.

    > “Requiring the state to issue false documents simply doesn’t change the reality that men cannot become women, and women cannot become men,” said Chase Scheuer, the office’s deputy communications director.

  14. TyraNotBanks5 on

    My uninformed opinion is that we don’t need gender/sex markers on IDs, I only see that information being relevant in a medical setting or social/romantic setting.

  15. A big issue here is that conservatives’ understanding of trans women is that they are straight male pedophiles who are fat, bald, and hairy, and they only cross dress to try to get into women’s bathrooms so they can rape little girls.

    And they don’t even think about trans men.

    There are tons of trans people who pass so well that you would never guess they are trans.

    Forcing passing trans people to identify as the opposite sex is going to create problems.

  16. Pasadenaian on

    It’s 2026, I still can’t believe we haven’t moved past stuff like this.

  17. Yea makes sense.

    Discrmination because someone is male is discrimination.

    Discimination becuase someone is not male is discrimination.

Leave A Reply