Kanada überarbeitet sein charakteristisches Einwanderungssystem für Fachkräfte. Folgendes ändert sich

https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/canada-is-overhauling-its-signature-skilled-immigration-system-heres-what-is-changing/article_a19c2606-fd74-4f76-bcb2-c5a5c2dabf5d.html

Share.

17 Kommentare

  1. This article is one sentence long. The picture description is longer than the article. Here is the article

    >Among the proposed changes to the country’s signature “point system” for economic immigrants is prioritizing higher wages and earning potential.

    Unless it’s behind a paywall and I am missing something?

  2. IntelligentDare7475 on

    Is it wrong to want to employ and train Canadians first? And for the argument thats states we dont have enough people qualified to work, why don’t we redirect some of this immigration money and invest in Canadians first and get them schooling to do the jobs?

  3. Yellow_Marker_ on

    #Ottawa to reform system for skilled migrants

    ‘‘ Maybe they could give points for certain fields of study that are in high demand and align with our labour shortages. If you get a master’s degree here, you should get some bonus points compared to somebody who studied outside Canada. MANDEEP LIDHER IMMIGRATION CONSULTANT IN CALGARY

    Toronto StarNICHOLAS KEUNG SENIOR IMMIGRATION REPORTER

    Canada is proposing a sweeping overhaul of its skilled immigration system that would include prioritizing higher wages and lucrative job offers when it comes to deciding who gets invited for permanent residence in this country.
    Among the proposed changes to the country’s signature “point system” for economic immigrants are factoring in wages and earning potential; offering an edge for those with a job offer in high-wage occupations; and downplaying the need for a Canadian education.
    The reforms, currently undergoing public consultation, have created a buzz among experts and critics, some concerned about the use of wages to assess prospective permanent residents and their impacts on local communities where low-wage, low-skilled jobs are also unfilled.
    “In the absence of strong pay equity and in the absence of strong employment equity, we know that women and racialized groups still earn less,” said Naomi Alboim, a senior policy fellow at Toronto Metropolitan University specializing in immigration. “If you’re doing it on what their wages were, you’re building potential inequity into the system.”
    It would be the first major overhaul of the so-called Express Entry system since it started in 2015. The system ranks candidates in a talent pool, where they get points for age, education, work experience, language skills and other factors. Those who come out on top are invited to apply for permanent residence via periodic draws for various immigration streams.
    “Potential reforms would support the government’s mission to attract the best talent in the world by ensuring that highly skilled and highearning candidates are selected in greater numbers,” the Immigration Department said in a slide deck obtained by the Star.
    What is the new Express Entry plan?
    As first reported in the Star last week, the department planned to cancel the three core federal skilled immigration programs — federal skilled workers, Canadian experience class and federal skilled trades — processed through the system, and streamline them into a single high-skilled immigration class.
    According to the plan, the new single immigration class would have these minimum requirements: Canadian high school or equivalent; intermediate language proficiency based on the Canadian language assessment system; and one year of cumulative work experience in an occupation earned in Canada or abroad in the last three years.
    The proposal said recent studies have found employment earnings as a temporary resident in Canada to be one of the best predictors of immigrants’ future employment and earnings. As a result, two factors would be added to the points grid to reward Canadian work experience in high-wage occupations and those with valid job offers from employers here.
    Based on data from Employment and Development Canada’s Job Bank and Statistics Canada’s Labour
    Market Survey and Census, officials would establish a list of high-wage occupations that meet certain thresholds above the national median wage.
    “Focusing on occupational earnings rather than individual earnings would mitigate key operational and integrity issues, and potential unintended consequences,” the Immigration Department’s presentation noted.
    Candidates would also be prioritized if they’re already licensed to practise in Canada and help address labour shortages in key sectors, it added.
    Points adjusted for Canadian education
    The proposal recommended removing or modifying points that are currently awarded to candidates nominated by provincial governments, proficient in French, with siblings and spouses in Canada, and who previously studied here.
    Calgary immigration consultant Mandeep Lidher welcomed the streamlining, and the use of Canadian median income by occupation rather than an individual’s actual wage as a base for earning potential, to avoid possible fraud by unscrupulous agents and employers.
    But he said it doesn’t make sense to remove the points for candidates with Canadian diplomas and degrees, especially given the recent reforms that have tightened the integrity of the international student program.
    “Maybe they could give points for certain fields of study that are in high demand and align with our labour shortages,” said Lidher. “If you get a master’s degree here, you should get some bonus points compared to somebody who studied outside Canada.”
    Toronto-area lawyer Sajjad Malik, a spokesperson for the Canadian Bar Association’s immigration law section, said using wages to evaluate a newcomer’s potential for success is problematic, as it can disproportionately affect essential workers such as those in skilled trades and risks repeating past mistakes by favouring candidates in white-collar jobs.
    If Express Entry is meant to focus on selecting immigrants based on wages and earning potential, he said officials must also reconsider tweaking the points awarded based on a person’s age because candidates in higher wage brackets tend to be older. Currently, points for age decline annually from 30, until it drops to zero at age 45.
    TMU’S Alboim said it’s hard to assess the impacts of these changes to economic immigration without knowing Ottawa’s plan with the provincial immigration nominee program and other regional immigration streams that are meant to meet local economic and demographic needs.
    Immigrants who tend to leave are those who are highly skilled because they are in demand everywhere, and removing points for family ties in Canada may further erode their incentive to come here, she noted.
    In a statement, the Immigration Department said these proposed changes are meant to help “select candidates most likely to drive economic growth.” An online survey will be posted on its website later this spring for public feedback.

  4. Uncertn_Laaife on

    They should definitely prioritize the (at the min) Master’s degree holders from the public Universities (not colleges) working in their respective field of jobs in Corporate and that are easier to verify with their HRs directly.

    Along with the language proficiency tests conduct them within Canada for those that are already here, these candidates should then be interviewed face to face to make sure they could speak English as it shows on their test scores. Change from IELTS to may be TOEFL as well, give the reigns to British Council abroad to conduct the English tests to avoid frauds. Or better, create a similar entity, may be name it as Canadian Council in coordination with the missions/embassies to oversea these tests, along with the personal interviews.

  5. The federal government is aiming to adjust permanent residence requirements, prioritizing higher salaried and skilled workers. They’re amalgamating into one high-skilled stream which will have three minimum requirements: Canadian high school education or equivalent, intermediate language proficiency and one year of cumulative work experience in Canada or three years abroad.

    Good news.

  6. FigureMost1687 on

    everyweek we have a new news that Liberals are overhauling immigration , just do it so we can get over with these stupid news…why everything takes forever to do in Canada ?

  7. gettingtgere on

    There should a special pathway for people who went to elite universities. UK has a stream called high potential in visual visa for people who went to top 100 universities in the world. We should have something like that too. Make it easier for smart and hard people to move here.

  8. firmretention on

    Weren’t they just complaining at the convention that too many educated Canadians are leaving? How does making competition stiffer and ultimately driving down wages for those jobs supposed to help retain them?

  9. lleonard188 on

    There’s plenty of skilled Canadians you just have to pay them properly.

  10. Brrrrrrrrrm on

    I think the wage system makes sense as long as there’s guardrails around this.
    I wish they had added:
    – Country caps by 7-10%. Exceptions to this rule for university professors and world class researchers. This is what the US is doing.
    – More emphasis on the English language proficiency.
    – Cut provincial and regional streams significantly as these are largely backdoor pathways who can’t meet the rigorous federal immigration requirements.
    – Favor people who went to legitimate U15 universities, I’ve seen very talented and well assimilated UofT and McGill grads leaving after failing to secure PR.
    – Eliminate points awarded to diploma mill credentials

  11. toilet_for_shrek on

    >But he said it doesn’t make sense to remove the points for candidates with Canadian diplomas and degrees, especially given the recent reforms that have tightened the integrity of the international student program.

    Are you kidding? That’s one of the points that *makes sense*. We’re still stuck with hundreds of thousands of diploma-mill graduates from places like strip mall colleges or Conestoga, where profit mattered more than education quality. Why should they be awarded points for their toilet paper diplomas? 

  12. They need to get rid of the French stream that nobody asked for, which is selecting much less qualified immigrants. By SIGNIFICANT margins.

  13. Lopsided-Rough-1562 on

    They should make the employers using lmias pay into a fund for educating Canadians. It would immediately disincentivize the people abusing it to get a „home care worker‘ who is just a relative into the country.

    We have to look after Canadians!

  14. I’m in the minority, but I want more immigrants to Canada.

     But I 100% agree we need to be more selective about who we let in – people go can build a house from scratch, people who can run a business, people who can be a doctor, etc… We should let in a lot of those people.

     Things like violent crime, serious traffic offences, substance abuse, need to be an immediate sentence to be sent back home.

     Singapore, for example, is a country the built itself off immigrants. But it doesn’t take lightly to immigrants abusing the system or being abused. Canada should take an example.

Leave A Reply