Das Verhältnis von Taille zu Körpergröße sagt das Bluthochdruckrisiko besser voraus als der BMI: Bei Teilnehmern mit WHtR-bewerteter hoher Fettmasse war die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass sie erhöhten Blutdruck hatten, um 50 % höher, und die Wahrscheinlichkeit, an Bluthochdruck zu leiden, war um 82 % höher

>The researchers used population-representative data from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2015–2023, including 19,124 participants aged 12 years or older. The WHtR cut-offs used to define sex-specific normal, high, and excess fat can be found at https://urfit-child.com/waist-height-calculator/. For this study, elevated blood pressure was defined as ≥120/70 mm Hg and hypertension ≥140/90 mm Hg. 
>
>In the most recent 2021–2023 NHANES cycle, including 7243 participants with a mean age of 44.8 years, the prevalence of elevated blood pressure was 63.5%, and the prevalence of hypertension was 14.4%. The ability of WHtR to predict the risk of elevated blood pressure and hypertension was determined after controlling for age, sex, ethnic background, educational status, smoking status, physical activity, total cholesterol and inflammation.
>
>The study revealed that participants with WHtR-assessed high fat mass were 50% more likely to have elevated blood pressure and 82% more likely to be hypertensive, and those with excess fat had respective 91% and 161% higher likelihoods of elevated blood pressure and hypertension. Excess adiposity conferred its strongest effect on blood pressure in adults aged 25–65 years. 
>
>Meanwhile, among youths under 25 years, WHtR-assessed high and excess fat increased the likelihood of elevated blood pressure by 66% and 98%, respectively. The association with hypertension was not statistically significant in this age group where hypertension was still rare. 
>
>On the other hand, unlike WHtR, which showed a stronger association with higher stages of hypertension, BMI-assessed overweight and obesity were strongly associated with elevated blood pressure – carrying 71% and 130% higher likelihoods, respectively – but neither were associated with hypertension across all participants.

[Novel Waist-to-Height Ratio Estimated Fat Mass Pediatric Cut-offs Predict Hypertension Better than Body Mass Index in Multiracial United States Youths and Adults: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2015–2023 Cycle – ScienceDirect](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022316626000751)

I’m pretty sure just a raw waist measurement would be more useful than BMI, though wthr is an obvious improvement on that. BMI is a dogwater measurement that, at best, has persisted due to inertia, though I strongly suspect that its utility in justifying increased health insurance premia is giving it a further lease on life. When I finally got in shape and put on a modest amount of muscle, I became forever “overweight” according to BMI. It’s a laughably inaccurate measurement.