Close Menu
    Politik

    Poilievre nennt das Foul, aber den feiernden Liberalen scheint es egal zu sein, wie sie eine Mehrheit erreichen

    Share.
    View 6 Comments

    6 Kommentare

    2. maybelying on

      If he was really against floor walking, then he could have supported the legislation a few years back that would have required a by-election when someone crosses the floor, instead of voting against it.

    3. BoswellsJohnson on

      To be fair, the Liberal party has always been flexible when it comes to values. It’s always been about saying and doing whatever it takes to obtain and hold power. That’s why it’s the most successful political party in Canada. 

    4. CaptainCanusa on

      > „I’ve heard [Gladu] scream at me on a number of occasions on things like climate change. She’s now joining a party who believes that climate is an issue and who is still putting in place measures to fight climate change.“

      A good point that a few people have brought up.

      What’s more likely, that Gladu influences the party away from climate change initiatives, or that the part with climate change initiatives just gained one more vote to pass those initiatives?

    5. russ_nightlife on

      I know that Poilievre would act completely differently in Carney’s position, if he had any principles.

      Luckily for him, Poilievre has no principles.

    6. reinventingmyself19 on

      A great feature of the Canadian system is that when you have a dumpster fire of a party like the conservatives, members of parliament are free to cross the floor to another party

    Leave A Reply