Close Menu
    Kanada

    Die Bundesregierung muss die privaten Eigentumsrechte von British Columbia schützen, sagt Poilievre

    Share.
    View 15 Comments

    15 Kommentare

    1. Line-Minute on

      Bro can’t even protect his own party’s property rights. It’s a fire sale over there. 😂

    2. Remarkable_Vanilla34 on

      The federal government needs to acknowledge property rights period. Its ridiculous that a progressive western nation like Canada doesn’t recognize them in our charter.

    3. Mylittlethrowaway2 on

      Federally: The Constitution Act, 1982 hands over power to regulate private property to the provinces.

      B.C is changing their UNDRIP law (or whatever their local law was named, based on UNDRIP) to protect private property rights.

      Not sure what the federal government can do here. Unless we now like the feds injecting themselves into provincial matters?

    4. [deleted] on

      Yep, they are. They’re protecting Indigenous peoples‘ private property.

    5. Wizardof_theNorth on

      What I find unbelievable is that this agreement is so vague as to not state whether private property is at risk.

    6. 17ywg on

      It’s funny because they thought the land acknowledgments would be nothing more than virtue signaling with no costs whatsoever. It’s great to watch this play out. The only down side is that the courts move so slow.

    7. uarentme on

      Anyone thinking that FNs are going to seize private property where people live is living in conspiracy land.

    9. No_Surprise_7384 on

      Hey PP timber separation of powers between levels of government? Maybe stick to your lane

    10. sounoriginal13 on

      What about the property rights violations happening in the name of a gun buyback program?

    12. Expensive_Plant_9530 on

      Isn’t this entire issue caused because BC doesn’t have treaties for most of the land it occupies?

      I don’t think the feds are the ones that need to solve this. I think that the BC government just needs to negotiate with the various indigenous peoples and create some new treaties.

      The feds probably could do this. Maybe it’s better if they do, because it would be official a lot of higher level.

      But then? Would provinces start accusing the feds of stepping on provincial rights?

      The article even says that the BC treaty commission has signalled its intent to negotiate with the various first nations to settle the issue across the entire province. This is exactly what needs to happen. If the feds can assist in this, they should.

    13. Mens-Real on

      Don’t they realize this affects our reputation as a place to invest? BC and the NDP as a whole really need to quit this. Just like Quebec with its bureaucratic environmental virtuousness (cuz I can’t pretend we’re better).

    14. Hanzo_The_Ninja on

      Some points that often go overlooked in these discussions:

      – [95% of BC is unceded territory](https://pentictonwesternnews.com/2021/11/20/95-of-b-c-considered-unceded-lands/).

      – [Section 35 of the Constitution Act affirms that Aboriginal title, and the rights that go along with it, exist whether or not there is a treaty](https://bctreaty.ca/negotiations/aboriginal-rights/).

      – Aboriginal land disputes are not a new phenomena in BC. There have been several high-profile cases where Aboriginal title in BC was affirmed over the years, including (but not limited to) in [2014](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsilhqotʼin_Nation_v_British_Columbia), in [1997](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delgamuukw_v_British_Columbia), and in [1971](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calder_v_British_Columbia_(AG)).

    Leave A Reply