Close Menu
    Politik

    Poilievre sagt, Ottawa müsse nach dem Urteil der Cowichan Tribes Privateigentum schützen

    Share.
    View 6 Comments

    6 Kommentare

    1. mukmuk64 on

      So the party of property rights is taking the position that property rights for some are more important than property rights for others.

      It’s pretty much an open and shut case that the property rights of the Cowichan were unlawfully violated here. Does Poilievre think that doesn’t mean anything?

      The lazy upside of being opposition is that you just have to criticize, but his position is inherently contradictory with his core ideology so it begs explanation of what he thinks is the fair approach here.

    2. Standard_Program7042 on

      The band and the government keep stating it has nothing to do with private property, so why don’t they put that in writing?

    6. Brodney_Alebrand on

      It’s clear that the Conservatives, at both the federal and provincial (BC) level, are the Party of colonialism. They don’t think it was bad that indigenous peoples were illegally stripped of their land in the past via colonial policies, and they want to continue to do colonialism into the future regardless of the legality. Run-of-the-mill conservative voters will basically admit this, but get upset if you point it out.

    Leave A Reply