Share.

20 Kommentare

  1. If certain people’s upbringing makes them more prone to commit violence, what measures should we take to protect purselves from them?

  2. TheSilentPrince on

    The problem that I have to giving people lesser sentences based on race, other than the obvious, is that it opens the door to giving **longer** sentences based on race. 

    Hell, I’d very much like to see a white guy in a case like this get a „normal“ sentence for a crime like this, and then sue for racial discrimination with this case as a precedent. Other than having somebody else murdered, of course. 

  3. ObamaOwesMeMoney on

    The article says that the judge ‚considered‘ his indigineity. It doesn’t say how much it reduced his sentence, if at all. It seems to suggest otherwise that a sentence was given in spite of his indigeneity.

  4. RedditSux5912 on

    Thinking with the progressive mindset, wouldn’t it make more sense to give a harsher punishment to those that committed a violent crime *against* someone of said protected class heritage? Not that is morally just either, but that would make more sense then this.

  5. Yeah it was cited because it’s a part of judges sentencing in every case. He was drunk as shit because his fucked up upbringing didn’t exactly give him the tools too be a well adjusted functioning member of society, that’s kinda how generational trauma works, it fucks people up.

    But that was far from the judges reasoning

    >mitigating factors that led the judge to a sentence at “the lower end of the applicable range” were McCook’s lack of criminal record before the shooting, his remorse in custody and during trial, his efforts to rehabilitate while in custody awaiting trial and sentencing and the Kwadacha reintegration plan upon his release.

    Not exactly a hardened criminal with no criminal record and the police

    > determined that McCook first fired the weapon toward the vehicle from inside the family home, with the bullet hitting Poole in the head.

    While Poole was sitting outside, in the truck. So not exactly an intended murder (hence why prosecution couldn’t secure a 2nd degree conviction).

    He was drunk as shit and criminally negligent but to say that gladue considerations are why he got a sentence on the lower end of the scale means either a tenuous grasp on basic comprehension or it’s simply a bad faith reading of the facts.

    I feel like the national post know what they’re writing so I’m gonna lean to the latter.

  6. The court does not give a fuck because they don’t live in the rez, same reason they don’t care when your car get stolen. It’s not their reality to deal with.

  7. ochocinco_tacos on

    It’s systemic racism and it’s fucking disgusting. This is exactly what is happening to the missing and murdered indigenous women.

  8. Cedar-and-Mist on

    This sort of institutionalised racism will only stop if indigenous nations themselves press the issue and don’t stop.

  9. In Canada a hate crime is:
    „… a criminal offence motivated by bias, prejudice, or hate based on an identifiable group’s race, national/ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental/physical disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity/expression.“

    Is this considered a Hate Judge?
    „… a criminal judgement motivated by bias, prejudice, or hate based on an identifiable group’s race, national/ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental/physical disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity/expression.“

  10. 25 years would have sobered him up….the crown should appeal.

    If you are held accountable for impaired driving, then you should be held accountable for any other criminal acts committed under the influence.

  11. voltairesalias on

    The Gladu Principle clearly must be helping the indigenous peoples of Canada.

Leave A Reply