(6. April 2026, Region Charkiw) Zwei Russen ergaben sich vor den ukrainischen Drohnen. Auf dem Weg zu den ukrainischen Linien töteten russische Drohnen die beiden Russen
(6. April 2026, Region Charkiw) Zwei Russen ergaben sich vor den ukrainischen Drohnen. Auf dem Weg zu den ukrainischen Linien töteten russische Drohnen die beiden Russen
Russians killed their own soldiers in the Kharkiv region
It all started with the fact that after effective drone strikes by units of the 3rd Marine Brigade on enemy positions, two Russian soldiers fled from there.
It was raining, and they hid in a drainage pipe under the road, where they stayed for almost two hours. They were „smoked out“ by drops from a „Vampire“ bomber, but they did not move.
Later, when an FPV drone flew into the pipe, they finally signaled that they were ready to surrender.
As soon as they came out, our „Mavic“ with a loudspeaker offered them water and food, and they went in the indicated direction.
Russian UAV operators also saw this scene and decided that „Russians do not surrender“. Initially, they struck with two FPVs and killed one of their own, and the other, when he hid in a landing, was finished off with a drop.
Nanners5618062 on
For people saying that surrendering to drones are easy or just wave a white flag. This is the risk associated on it especially when they are far from Ukrainian lines
Oguri___Cap on
Imagine not wanting to give back Ukrainian POWs so bad that you kill your own men as an example
DeadguyTheLateGI on
Question – in footage like this, it’s always claimed that Russians kill the surrendering soldiers (through artillery fire, drones, shooting, etc.). There’s never any visual confirmation in the footage to suggest who actually did the killing. How can we ever be certain that it wasn’t simply another Ukrainian unit, with whom the capturing unit doesn’t maintain constant communication? Simply because someone on Telegram said so?
Reddit-Hell on
America moves heaven and earth to bring back downed pilots and Russia simply dronestrikes their own men to prevent capture.
Pave_Low on
As an aside.
We often see videos of Russian soldiers being inhumane and uncaring towards their comrades. I think there’s a lot of cherry-picking in the videos that make their way to the public. I think that’s done to further the narrative that Russians are cruel, uncaring monsters. And while I’m sure that some of them are, I’ve never been convinced that the entire Russian army is staffed by sociopaths, as some would like us to believe.
That one soldier was desperately trying to save his buddy. From the beginning to the end. Dragging him out of the hole. Helping him walk. And even when it was obvious his buddy was dead, he still tried to carry him. I don’t often feel sorry for Russian soldiers because of the terrible crime against Ukraine they are committing. This one hits a bit different.
Wrong_Lingonberry_79 on
Straight murder. They were non-combatants. This is a war crime. The Geneva Conventions prohibits the killing of an enemy that has surrendered.
The murder of a non-combatant soldier—specifically one who is hors de combat (wounded, sick, shipwrecked, or surrendered)—is a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions and constitutes a war crime. Common Article 3 and Additional Protocols prohibit violence to life, murder, and torture against anyone not actively fighting.
Hors de Combat Status: A soldier who is incapacitated by wounds or sickness, or who has dropped their weapons and surrendered, cannot be legally attacked.
Common Article 3: Applies to all conflicts (international or internal), forbidding murder, mutilation, and cruel treatment of those not taking an active part in hostilities.
Prohibition of „No Survivors“: It is strictly forbidden to order that there shall be no survivors, to threaten an adversary therewith, or to conduct hostilities on such basis.
Protection of Surrendered Personnel: A soldier who clearly expresses an intention to surrender must be treated as a prisoner of war and not killed.
Binding Commitment: Ukraine is obligated to uphold all four Geneva Conventions and Protocol I, which govern the treatment of wounded soldiers, prisoners of war (POWs), and civilians in occupied territories.
Anyone who disagrees with this is a piece of shit.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
7 Kommentare
Additional information from Telegram:
Russians killed their own soldiers in the Kharkiv region
It all started with the fact that after effective drone strikes by units of the 3rd Marine Brigade on enemy positions, two Russian soldiers fled from there.
It was raining, and they hid in a drainage pipe under the road, where they stayed for almost two hours. They were „smoked out“ by drops from a „Vampire“ bomber, but they did not move.
Later, when an FPV drone flew into the pipe, they finally signaled that they were ready to surrender.
As soon as they came out, our „Mavic“ with a loudspeaker offered them water and food, and they went in the indicated direction.
Russian UAV operators also saw this scene and decided that „Russians do not surrender“. Initially, they struck with two FPVs and killed one of their own, and the other, when he hid in a landing, was finished off with a drop.
For people saying that surrendering to drones are easy or just wave a white flag. This is the risk associated on it especially when they are far from Ukrainian lines
Imagine not wanting to give back Ukrainian POWs so bad that you kill your own men as an example
Question – in footage like this, it’s always claimed that Russians kill the surrendering soldiers (through artillery fire, drones, shooting, etc.). There’s never any visual confirmation in the footage to suggest who actually did the killing. How can we ever be certain that it wasn’t simply another Ukrainian unit, with whom the capturing unit doesn’t maintain constant communication? Simply because someone on Telegram said so?
America moves heaven and earth to bring back downed pilots and Russia simply dronestrikes their own men to prevent capture.
As an aside.
We often see videos of Russian soldiers being inhumane and uncaring towards their comrades. I think there’s a lot of cherry-picking in the videos that make their way to the public. I think that’s done to further the narrative that Russians are cruel, uncaring monsters. And while I’m sure that some of them are, I’ve never been convinced that the entire Russian army is staffed by sociopaths, as some would like us to believe.
That one soldier was desperately trying to save his buddy. From the beginning to the end. Dragging him out of the hole. Helping him walk. And even when it was obvious his buddy was dead, he still tried to carry him. I don’t often feel sorry for Russian soldiers because of the terrible crime against Ukraine they are committing. This one hits a bit different.
Straight murder. They were non-combatants. This is a war crime. The Geneva Conventions prohibits the killing of an enemy that has surrendered.
The murder of a non-combatant soldier—specifically one who is hors de combat (wounded, sick, shipwrecked, or surrendered)—is a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions and constitutes a war crime. Common Article 3 and Additional Protocols prohibit violence to life, murder, and torture against anyone not actively fighting.
Hors de Combat Status: A soldier who is incapacitated by wounds or sickness, or who has dropped their weapons and surrendered, cannot be legally attacked.
Common Article 3: Applies to all conflicts (international or internal), forbidding murder, mutilation, and cruel treatment of those not taking an active part in hostilities.
Prohibition of „No Survivors“: It is strictly forbidden to order that there shall be no survivors, to threaten an adversary therewith, or to conduct hostilities on such basis.
Protection of Surrendered Personnel: A soldier who clearly expresses an intention to surrender must be treated as a prisoner of war and not killed.
Binding Commitment: Ukraine is obligated to uphold all four Geneva Conventions and Protocol I, which govern the treatment of wounded soldiers, prisoners of war (POWs), and civilians in occupied territories.
Anyone who disagrees with this is a piece of shit.