Dies ergibt sich wahrscheinlich aus den Bevölkerungszahlen von 2025. Ich habe versucht, die Originalquelle zu durchsuchen, konnte aber nicht viel finden.
I think the colors should be the other way around.
__Quercus__ on
Whoa, slow down Tibet…almost up to replacement level.
monerx on
0???
Suitable-Departure-5 on
0 lmao
Aggressive-Story3671 on
0.26 is INSANE
Bellanzz on
Whoa. That’s impressive.
It is not just that the TFR is, on average, low. But the coastal regions are depopulating rapidly. I guess this is offset due to internal migration?
fermentedcorn on
We Koreans are truly neighbors with them.
chunkylover___53 on
From the source:
“Xizang and Guizhou stand out because their birth rates remain above replacement level, unlike most of China.”
In other words, this source is at best AI slop and at worst someone who has no idea what they’re talking about.
Think we can assume this map is crap.
LockNo2943 on
Everyone knew this would happen after the one child policy.
Dazzling-Pitch671 on
Honestly hard to believe
Dme1663 on
Colour scheme should be the other way around.
k3surfacer on
The „west“ seems to be optimistically concerned about lower Chinese fertility rates. Is this what they think will magically help them from falling into irrelevance soon?
It won’t work for them.
emptybamboo on
Map uses Xizang for Tibet – this is a word pushed by China to try to erase Tibet’s distinct identity.
Deep_Head4645 on
0? That cant be true
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
16 Kommentare
Credits [here](https://indiadatamap.com/2026/01/27/fertility-rates-in-china/)
Are there no babies in Jiangsu?
I think the colors should be the other way around.
Whoa, slow down Tibet…almost up to replacement level.
0???
0 lmao
0.26 is INSANE
Whoa. That’s impressive.
It is not just that the TFR is, on average, low. But the coastal regions are depopulating rapidly. I guess this is offset due to internal migration?
We Koreans are truly neighbors with them.
From the source:
“Xizang and Guizhou stand out because their birth rates remain above replacement level, unlike most of China.”
In other words, this source is at best AI slop and at worst someone who has no idea what they’re talking about.
Think we can assume this map is crap.
Everyone knew this would happen after the one child policy.
Honestly hard to believe
Colour scheme should be the other way around.
The „west“ seems to be optimistically concerned about lower Chinese fertility rates. Is this what they think will magically help them from falling into irrelevance soon?
It won’t work for them.
Map uses Xizang for Tibet – this is a word pushed by China to try to erase Tibet’s distinct identity.
0? That cant be true