Journalist Rob Levine verklagt FAA wegen Flugverbotszone für Drohnen, die Dreharbeiten verhindern soll ICE | Ein Fotojournalist aus Minnesota wendet sich aus Gründen des Ersten Verfassungszusatzes gegen eine Flugbeschränkung von 3.000 Fuß in der Nähe von DHS-Einrichtungen.
https://www.404media.co/journalist-sues-faa-over-drone-no-fly-zone-designed-to-prevent-filming-ice/
4 Kommentare
I mean, I kinda understand it given how easily drones can be weaponized.
Not to mention, there’s not really a way to know if it’s someone using it for journalism versus somebody that taped a grenade to it.
Nobody would bat an eye if they blocked off an area and said “no cars through here, pedestrian traffic only.”
It’ll be dropped for no merit.
I think the argument that it’s too vague has merit. Not when the vehicles may be unmarked.
However the argument that it’s a first amendment or reporting issue will have a major uphill battle. Lots of luck on that one.
He’ll lose. National security is a non starter at the supreme court. They’ve made it clear when the government claims national security and can prove it they win.