Close Menu
    Politics

    Trump ist nicht immun gegen zivilrechtliche Ansprüche aus der Rede vom 6. Januar, entscheidet der Richter

    Share.
    View 17 Comments

    17 Kommentare

    2. ArArmytrainingsir on

      Any 12 people would rule against him. Only need a majority. Be lucky to get three or four mega people out of 12 nowadays.

    4. absolutelynotagoblin on

      Great. Can I sue Donald Trump for the perpetual state of rage and anxiety I’ve been dealing with for over a year now?

    7. TraditionalBackspace on

      Personal liability is what’s missing from our justice system with regard to elected officials‘ lawbreaking.

    8. echoeco on

      …are you voting for someone who’ll hold him accountable and his backroom sponsors and project 2025 supporters…stop the undermining red vs blue, vote for representation that acts against greed, corruption and oppression and for the respect/rights for us/US all…a united state of mind….

    9. Bradski89 on

      I assume any law suits he does lose will somehow be paid for by the taxpayer.

    10. Iyamahamm on

      Open the floodgates. Play his game. Inundate him with so many claims he cannot possibly fight them all. Drown him. I’ll get the popcorn.

    13. Yetiius on

      Does that mean we can all sue for irreparable damages to our mental health and democracy?

    14. sgr28 on

      One thing I’ve been trying to point out that I wish more people would realize is that the core illegal act of Trump trying to overturn the 2020 election was not implying to the J6 crowd that they should attack the Capitol, and it was not the phone call to the Georgia governor pressuring him to find 11,000 votes. The core illegal act was when Trump called the Speaker of the Georgia state house and said he wanted the state legislature to meet in a special session, and he was planning to lie that he actually won the state and thus the Georgia result needed to be „turned over“.

    Leave A Reply