Kathleen Kennedy hat gerade auf einer KI-Konferenz erzählt, dass sie sich bei KI nicht so sicher sei

In the end, those who are unsure about AI will have to accept it anyway.

[deleted]

>“Taste is so fundamental to the process of creating things,” she said, in an on-stage conversation with Runway co-funder Cristóbal Valenzuela as part of an AI summit that the New York-based startup hosted in Manhattan Tuesday. “It’s life experiences; it’s educational. The best directors of films and photography came out of art, they studied art,” she said. She suggested AI-driven films by definition couldn’t have that experience.

Yeah I think she’s spot on. For all of the advancements, AI is only able to mimic the responses of a real human. Those differences show through in film, games and still images.

Speaking from experience, the artistic process is usually an intuitive one, not a logical one. It’s the sum total of your mood, your technique and the myriad number of random elements on that given day that can influence the outcome. The value of art is how those things come together to form authentic human expression. A window into the individual soul that words cannot reach.

Ai can make a picture, it cannot perform the act of painting or filmmaking, with all of the painstaking human factors that give us our best works.

wtf I love AI now

Let’s get you to bed

So they gonna hire more art degrees? lol. I joke. The answer is obviously no

The only time AI is useful to me is at work when I can just ask it why a company needs to buy [redacted] from me and who the [redacted] decision maker is. I’m not an engineer, I’m sales, so the AI makes me able to have a rudimentary conversation about extremely specific engineering topics.

People who are applying AI to every aspect of their lives need to reevaluate what they’re doing. AI is a tool, not a guide for how to live life.

AI is a great tool for me to do simple queries/searches, tweak my PowerPoints and emails, and in general give me a good starting point on where I should start my work/prioritize.

AI isn’t there with the judgement/critical thinking piece, and is really limited to the models it’s been trained on.

But mind you, in our corporate environment we have
Co-pilot… so it’s already not good.
Last week at an executive meeting we had a manager come out and say “well co-pilot says X so it must be true”, not realizing that we had updated our policy a month ago, and copilot didn’t use the updated policy (which this executives signed off on).

It was the first time I’ve seen our executive team actually pause in shock at someone using AI in such a confident but incorrect manner. Which kinda shows you how AI has been upsold to a lot of them.

We’re now trying to work on our governance to clearly highlight that it’s not the AI who is going to liable, but the human who signed off on. Apparently a lot of people think they’re absolved from responsibility for AI actions.