Anthropic fordert wegen Urheberrechtsverletzung die Entfernung von mehr als 8.000 Kopien des Quellcodes von Claude Code an
https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/anthropic-races-to-contain-leak-of-code-behind-claude-ai-agent-4bc5acc7?st=BQwoMN&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
40 Kommentare
The AI War has begun! ..
Next hijack the Drones, attack the Whitehouse & blame it on Wales! ..
Perhaps they’re just embarrassed by how astoundingly bad some of that code is
Now they are worried about copyright lol.
By take down they mean we should “download” right? Right.
I dunno man I’m still on team “this is an April fool’s joke“
Good luck with that.
Im sorry, code written by an LLM can’t be copyrighted.
Feels bad when it happens to you, doesn’t it Anthropic?
Hey look, the company that did around $1.5 billion worth of copyright violations in book piracy has suddenly decided copyright matters…
I’m just learning from it! That was your excuse to ingest and often times verbatim regurgitate copyrighted works. Or is somehow your IP special and needs to be protected but everyone else’s is fair game. Amodei is a big a hypocrite as Altman.
Just use it for training purposes and promise to remove it afterwards…
Wow – they dont know what the „internet“ is. Once out you can not stop it…
Oh, the irony is rich
Owners of plagiarism machine mad that schematics of their machine were plagiarized
If this code is generated by ai then it has no copyright
AI companies concerned about copyright always makes me giggle.
I didn’t steal the code, I just trained my AI with it, so of course it’s legal
can’t copyright their AI written code lol
AI companies…. *don’t* like it when another company comes along and violates their ownership of intellectual property?
Huh.
Well, imagine that.
The irony of this is… Large?
Copies, or original creations of AI inspired by the Claude’s source code?
But what if I say, I’m trying to use their source code to train my AI? Aren’t I allowed to do it then?
Frankly, I don’t understand what are the downsides of making it opensource.
We can scrape data, but don’t scrape our data!
Hey man man we are just using it for training data. Also didn’t you write it with AI and doesn’t that make it uncopyrightable?
Wasn’t it established that LLM generateed code has no copyright?
But they said Claude Code wrote Claude Code … which means it’s not subject to copyright protection …
How dare you plagiarize my plagiarism machine?
I wonder how much of their codebase was AI generated? It is actually quite an interesting question in that they can’t do a takedown if the majority of the codebase was AI generated. So either they are full of shit in that they are saying AI will replace all developers by the end of the year (they said the same last year) or they can’t protect their copyright. I really wish I had a copy of their source code and some money to fight their DMCA takedown requests in court to get discovery to answer this question.
Wait this is real? I thought it was April fools
Streisand effect
As others have noted the spectacle of an LLM company complaining about copyright infringement is hilarious, but there’s another level of irony here: somebody downloaded the source code and used an AI engine to rewrite it all in Python, which Anthropic can’t force to be taken down since it’s considered a derivative work and copyright doesn’t cover those. So people are using AI to steal from AI as well.
Busily unspilling spilt milk.
I have a feeling it’s already WAY too late for that to matter.
„It’s not Claude code. ChatGPT wrote it for me.“
Oh the irony
This gotta be April fools
„Help! Help! Somebody is copying my plagiarism machine!“
That’s a blunder to be honest.
All they’re doing is highlighting how completely two-faced AI companies are about intellectual property.
Its legal if you’re using it for training data as established on-going precedent by the courts and the will of the corporations so just claim you’re feeding it into your own ai and you’ll be good!