no matter what argument is made, ive never been able to trust that the shroud is genuine
ghulamalchik on
It was never genuine to begin with. Carbon dating says it originated in the medieval period.
Gandalfthebran on
White nationalists and Abrahamic supremacists in shambles.
Salami__Tsunami on
All these relics were just useful for the churches to charge people money. Sorry guys, I don’t care if you’ve got John the Baptist’s foreskin, I’m not giving you my credit card number.
Aggressive_Chair1470 on
I mean, the shrouds a scam anyway right
star_particles on
It does kinda look like an Indian dude with a beard.
Albino_Earwig on
Thats very interesting especially since it dosent support any of the prevailing theories let alone it being of Christ. Or maybe the black hebrew israelites are right and Yahawashi was a half indian black man! Say it agaaain!!!!
locki13 on
Thank god the image didnt show up in the shoe box of a kid pleasuring himself into it. Its either this or toast.
Shadw_Wulf on
I mean… Wasn’t it kind of obvious by the nose and moustache 😵💫🤷😵💫🤷😵💫
Angry_Anthropologist on
Literally the very first mention of the Shroud of Turin in the historical record is a bishop saying that it’s fake, that they found the guy who made it, and that he admitted it was a fake. It is deeply embarrassing that there are people out there still think it is real.
BimBomBom on
The Shroud of Turin really drives them mad and to do everything to discredit it
ITSNAIMAD on
Fake
CitizenLohaRune on
Insert Nelson haha gif.
traps_th on
There’s a nice docu on this in youtube, a bit old but they talk about an important detail, the image of the face that you see is very flat, like a picture ir drawing, if this was used to cover a face and then imprint it by the image it would be warped and more wider as a face has volume and depth, meaning this is jus prob a very important painting done over the textile either before or after it was used to cover the body, supposedly, and not the lore that the image just imprint w/ a perfect and accurate image of the face of J-man
geilercuck on
the shroud is the most mysterious scientific riddle our time, and it is absolutely not a „fake“. It is an real artifact which characteristics cannot be explained by ancient or medieval techniques.
A paper was published in the „Journal of Imaging Science and Technology“ which describes that scientists were able to change the linen in a very small scale like the pattern on the shroud which shows the crucified man, however, they used ultra short laser in the ultraviolet range. The modelocking technique which generates such ultra short lasers is not older than 50 years and there is no energy source on earth which provides this high amount to generate the entire image ( 34000 million watts are needed).
Doi for the paper: 10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2010.54.4.040302
Everything about it is just weird. As a scientist myself I am really fascinated by it.
I hope OP can provide me with the link to the source of his clame.
YenneferWho on
On first glance I thought this is somehow going to be about Epstein lol
LoneHerper on
Jesus was a psyop
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
18 Kommentare
Lol
no matter what argument is made, ive never been able to trust that the shroud is genuine
It was never genuine to begin with. Carbon dating says it originated in the medieval period.
White nationalists and Abrahamic supremacists in shambles.
All these relics were just useful for the churches to charge people money. Sorry guys, I don’t care if you’ve got John the Baptist’s foreskin, I’m not giving you my credit card number.
I mean, the shrouds a scam anyway right
It does kinda look like an Indian dude with a beard.
Thats very interesting especially since it dosent support any of the prevailing theories let alone it being of Christ. Or maybe the black hebrew israelites are right and Yahawashi was a half indian black man! Say it agaaain!!!!
Thank god the image didnt show up in the shoe box of a kid pleasuring himself into it. Its either this or toast.
I mean… Wasn’t it kind of obvious by the nose and moustache 😵💫🤷😵💫🤷😵💫
Literally the very first mention of the Shroud of Turin in the historical record is a bishop saying that it’s fake, that they found the guy who made it, and that he admitted it was a fake. It is deeply embarrassing that there are people out there still think it is real.
The Shroud of Turin really drives them mad and to do everything to discredit it
Fake
Insert Nelson haha gif.
There’s a nice docu on this in youtube, a bit old but they talk about an important detail, the image of the face that you see is very flat, like a picture ir drawing, if this was used to cover a face and then imprint it by the image it would be warped and more wider as a face has volume and depth, meaning this is jus prob a very important painting done over the textile either before or after it was used to cover the body, supposedly, and not the lore that the image just imprint w/ a perfect and accurate image of the face of J-man
the shroud is the most mysterious scientific riddle our time, and it is absolutely not a „fake“. It is an real artifact which characteristics cannot be explained by ancient or medieval techniques.
A paper was published in the „Journal of Imaging Science and Technology“ which describes that scientists were able to change the linen in a very small scale like the pattern on the shroud which shows the crucified man, however, they used ultra short laser in the ultraviolet range. The modelocking technique which generates such ultra short lasers is not older than 50 years and there is no energy source on earth which provides this high amount to generate the entire image ( 34000 million watts are needed).
Doi for the paper: 10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2010.54.4.040302
Everything about it is just weird. As a scientist myself I am really fascinated by it.
I hope OP can provide me with the link to the source of his clame.
On first glance I thought this is somehow going to be about Epstein lol
Jesus was a psyop