If he was still conservative there this sub would be going absolutely nuts. Another liberal free pass for him
shiftless_wonder on
>In a statement, his office said he was using a „common CPC tactic“ of asking short yes or no questions to a witness „in order to control the flow of the dialogue.“
Ma „used a quick burst of [yes or no] questions to move away from the anti-China EV witness and then give the floor to the pro-China EV witness. That was the strategy on paper,“ according to an email sent to CBC News from his office.
*What an odd thing to say in a statement. Also odd is the headline CBC comes up with here which conveniently misses the actual controversy of Ma downplaying forced labour use in China. And CBC made sure to bury this article well down in the home page.
Grubbylittleoink on
If you get a chance to see clips of him doing his act during the committee hearings it will shock you, it is very disturbing. He should not only apologize he should resign. I wonder how the people in his constituency feel about it.
Low-HangingFruit on
As a conservative voter, thanks for taking him off our hands.
ESSOBEE1 on
Stupid ass
shivanman on
Gotta love CBCs framing of denying China’s human rights abuse as “behaviour in committee meeting about Chinese EVs”. That’s an awfully generous headline.
sillywalkr on
guess the chinese wechat commie group told him to
Kindly_Professor5433 on
Why aren’t MPs required to pass security clearance to be elected?
If CSIS just spends a few hours looking into his background, there’s zero chance that he isn’t a Chinese spy.
neilbork on
I was upset that he crossed the floor, but i guess it is a small price to pay to be rid of a slavery apologist.
bo-n-es on
Carney sure knows how to pick them.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
10 Kommentare
If he was still conservative there this sub would be going absolutely nuts. Another liberal free pass for him
>In a statement, his office said he was using a „common CPC tactic“ of asking short yes or no questions to a witness „in order to control the flow of the dialogue.“
Ma „used a quick burst of [yes or no] questions to move away from the anti-China EV witness and then give the floor to the pro-China EV witness. That was the strategy on paper,“ according to an email sent to CBC News from his office.
*What an odd thing to say in a statement. Also odd is the headline CBC comes up with here which conveniently misses the actual controversy of Ma downplaying forced labour use in China. And CBC made sure to bury this article well down in the home page.
If you get a chance to see clips of him doing his act during the committee hearings it will shock you, it is very disturbing. He should not only apologize he should resign. I wonder how the people in his constituency feel about it.
As a conservative voter, thanks for taking him off our hands.
Stupid ass
Gotta love CBCs framing of denying China’s human rights abuse as “behaviour in committee meeting about Chinese EVs”. That’s an awfully generous headline.
guess the chinese wechat commie group told him to
Why aren’t MPs required to pass security clearance to be elected?
If CSIS just spends a few hours looking into his background, there’s zero chance that he isn’t a Chinese spy.
I was upset that he crossed the floor, but i guess it is a small price to pay to be rid of a slavery apologist.
Carney sure knows how to pick them.