Großbritannien enthält sich bei wichtiger UN-Abstimmung zur Anerkennung der Sklaverei als „schwerstes Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit“

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/slavery-britain-us-united-nations-crime-humanity-b2945676.html

    Von boycecodd

    Share.

    49 Kommentare

    1. FlaviousTiberius on

      The headline neglects the part where it turns out it’s just yet another bid to get money out of the west. We didn’t sign it because it would sign us up for paying out a load of money we don’t actually have, unless we’re willing to accept big budget cuts and higher taxes to pay for it.

    2. KhaosByDesignUK on

      It’s a complicated topic and it’s definitely up there, but I feel like genocide is worse though? 

    3. SavageRabbitX on

      If they want reparations for the Slave trade. We want paying for using our Navy to end it

    4. Invictus_0x90_ on

      Are they gunna ask for reparations from the eastern slave traders? I think not.

    5. RECTUSANALUS on

      Its one of but not the gravest crime against humanity.

      And getting exclusivley western nations to pay up is beyond hypocritical.

    6. SalamanderGlad9053 on

      Slavery has happened for all of human history by almost everyone. Countries should be paying the UK for being the first major power to ban slavery and enforce this ban internationally.

    7. The Independent is awful with its misleading, clickbaity headlines. The first two sentences of the article show what a nothing burger this story is in reality:

      *The UN General Assembly has formally recognised the trafficking of enslaved Africans as „the gravest crime against humanity,“ while also calling for reparations to address historical injustices.*

      *The resolution, passed on Wednesday, additionally urges the „prompt and unhindered restitution“ of cultural artefacts – including artworks, monuments, and national archives – to their countries of origin without charge.*

      I wouldn’t have supported this nonsense either. All slavery is wicked, whatever the time or the continent. And paying reparations, where all the villains and monsters are long, long dead, is not happening. Ever.

    8. thehighyellowmoon on

      Why should the UK pay money to tinpot dictatorships who loot their own countries and keep their populations at the other end of a gun over something that happened with their complicity 400-200 years ago?

    9. Univeralise on

      Its good to understand the complexities of our history so we can strive to better and not make the same mistakes as the people before us.

      But in the same part; this really is just virtue signaling. We do not charge someone’s child when there father has committed a crime. Why should we have to pay for something we had no control over.

      It’s an oversimplification but it feels equivalent of asking a nation like Mongolia to pay reparations for the damage Genghis Khan did to other nations.

    10. helpmaboabjings on

      Meh we’ve given enough at this point. Time to move on and let them pick themselves up

      Honestly get over it already, it’s just holding them back

    11. oncemorein2thebeach on

      I see the UN is doing its best to reduce its influence and importance by encouraging even more countries to totally ignore it.

    12. MaleficentMajima on

      UK ended slavery, plus the UK was not even the top dog in the slave trade.

      I swear all the big slave nations like Portugal are loving the fact the UK is getting all the hate while they go unseen.

    13. I actually want them to proceed with this. Lets open this up and have a honest conversation about it. And don’t just talk about the Atlantic Slave Trade, but how about all slavery is the ‚gravest crime against humanity.‘

      Then, when we start to talk reparations, we have an open and honest conversation about it. That includes slavery committed by all countries, and about those who benefitted from slavery in all countries throughout history, and how they need to pay for it. You know, like the African tribes who sold their men into slavery of their own free will.

      This includes slavery that is still committed today by many countries who have been the most vocal about this. It is estimated that there are 7 million slaves in Africa today.

      Unless, of course, those slaves are somehow lesser than the slaves in the Atlantic Slave Trade that we managed to crush in probably the single biggest action to actually tackle the slave trade in history.

    14. Voice_Still on

      Even if Britain did pay, you know full well the money would not be put to good use and would line the pockets of a corrupt minority.

    15. NGeoTeacher on

      This is such an unhelpful headline, and the vote itself is just…weird. The UK was right to abstain (or reject it).

      It’s not just ’slavery‘, which would be one thing, it’s specifically Transatlantic slavery. Creating a hierarchy of crimes against humanity serves no purpose, and it lessens the seriousness of all the other cases of slavery, past and present (or victims of genocide or any number of other atrocities). Millions of people continue to live as slaves today, or in conditions that aren’t technically slavery, but effectively slavery. Including, and *especially,* in the countries that voted for this motion, i.e. much of the Middle East and West/North Africa.

      I happen to support returning of looted artefacts, and I support international aid, which the UK does a lot of. However, there’s no sensible way of calculating a specific figure of what is owed in the form of reparations, nor who owes what to who. It’s also highly questionable, given the legacy of bilateral aid, whether we’d see meaningful development as a result.

    16. Hellstorm901 on

      Rich of China to vote for this when China engages in modern day slavery but I guess they get to vote for stuff like this when their government recognised slavery can only be against human beings and China doesn’t define the Uighur as that

    17. fayemoonlight on

      I say this as a black person, there is no single gravest crime against humanity. There are things which are the epitome of evil, and that includes the Atlantic Slave Trade (which was different to other forms of slavery up until that point so it’s not comparable). I don’t like this whole competition on who has suffered the most. Humans have done so much evil shit in the last 200,000 years; it’s impossible and incredibly unhelpful to try and powerscale trauma

    18. No-Strike-4560 on

      If we are going to start being guilty of crimes that our ancestors perpetrated, what next? Life imprisonment because your great, great, great grandad murdered someone? Absolute nonsense.

      Besides , the greatest crime against humanity is clearly the Crazy Frog tune.

    19. Italy looks around the EU parliament at all the countries occupied by the Romans and says „Don’t even think about it!“

    20. brocanyouchillout on

      no duh? it’s trying to turn it into some trauma olympics where it’s declared the single worst thing that’s ever happened, disregarding the other slave trades (which shipped MORE), disregarding the current ON-GOING slave trades, disregarding the various genocides, disregarding basically a whole load of horrible stuff. it’s silly. there are only a few legitimate countries that deserve reparations because they are still suffering TODAY. the decendants of the slave trade aren’t suffering on that scale, nowhere near. it’s stupid tbh. we all know it was a terrible thing but it does not deserve precedence when humanity’s history and our modern day is FILLED with abhorrent actions.

    21. Film_Actors_Guide on

      You cannot have reparations without targeting those who sold the slaves. And Africa receives approximately 60 billion annually in foreign aid from western nations. It just doesn’t seem fair to pay reparations to countries and people who are already receiving massive amounts of money, and imo western countries will be less likely to provide aid if they have to pay reparations

    22. Any_Tomorrow_Today on

      Until they address the current African slave trade – they really don’t have a leg to stand on.

    23. ManonFire1213 on

      IIRC, it would also require countries who have relics, artifacts etc to return them. 

    24. They’re not even including all slavery, just the african slave trade. Classing that as the worst surely diminishes all other slavery?

    25. Aggravating-Curve755 on

      We took out the largest loan ever taken out to end slavery and only finished paying it in 2015.

      We’ve certainly done more than most to end it.

    26. Otherwise-Factor8099 on

      Are the African tribe leaders who sold their own people in to slavery going to pay reparations ? The silence from them says it all, hypocrites .

    27. I say this as someone from a country that was substantially fucked by the British.

      Reparations from who? The average working class person and a majority of their ancestors had fuck all control over the Empire or its actions. And i very much doubt the Royal family or the horde of old Money would happily or easily give up what their ancestors took.

      Personally I would prefer ‚reparations‘ in the form of education that doesn’t gloss over the crimes of the past but teaches them (UK seems to focus more on the crimes of American slavery than it does the crimes of the Empire).

    28. I don’t really get the notion of atrocity Olympics. Slavery was abhorrent, so was the Holocaust, Pol Pot, the holodomor, Stalin, the Japanese conquest of China and Korea, the American treatment of Native peoples….and countless other acts of barbarism current day and historical

      Quantifying which was the worst seems strangely insulting as it implies some were ‘better’

    29. SureSell6750 on

      Why do we have to rank our crimes against humanity as if it’s the hundred greatest tv bloopers on channel 4

    30. DateNecessary8716 on

      1. It wasn’t slavery, it was specifically the trans-atlantic slave trade, modern slavery, and the many cultures and civilisations that have, are and will enslave were left out, it’s just the West that’s evil.
      2. It states it was the single most abhorrent event in human history, firstly, it wasn’t the largest enslavement, longest, etc. I believe Korea holds the record for the longest unbroken chain of slavery (pun un-intended). But holy subjectiveness! Would you say the genocide of millions, the experimentation on live subjects or the testing of explosives on pregnant women was less abhorrent? It’s just so stupid to discuss in that light.
      3. It demands reparations (It’s a cash grab), which leaves out the inconvenient truth of who sold the slaves to Europe and America, and conveniently again, the countries that have and continue to enslave.

      It’s a cynical cash-grab, nothing more. African states want a free check. None of this is to downplay the horrors of the British Empire slave trade, but if we actually roll out reparations for the sins of the past, how far back we going? Are we just going to exchange cash in a circle for all of history?

    31. Reasonable_Goat6895 on

      If I was a slave today, in the worst slave trade in human history (which covers a huge amount of ground), I’d be offended by this shit.

      Did they use digital devices to cast the votes? Wonder where the minerals and components used came from?

      Slavery.

    32. Every-Ad-3488 on

      Was bound to happen when a resolution basically says „the injustice that your people suffered was not as great as the injustice that my people suffered“. Maybe think the next time you include ranking in your resolution

    33. EfficientRecover5757 on

      Last I checked it was a stupid idea to “rank” crimes against humanity.

      They’re are equally as evil. End of.

    34. ILikeVancouver on

      UK is the one that paid out the wazoo to stop it, and then spent even more on enforcing it worldwide. I believe they are owed a thank you if anything.

    35. Completely agree with this abstention. If not for the optics, I’d prefer us to vote against it

      First up, let me be clear that I’m completely against slavery

      But with that said

      1. The idea of declaring things about something that happened hundreds of years ago like this is performative nonsense
      2. Declaring one genocide as being worse than another is ridiculous
      3. It’s mostly an attempt to extract money from Europe and the USA to Africa … not even to the people who were actually trafficked to the US/Caribbean as slaves
      4. I’m fundamentally against the principle of “the child paying for the sins of the father” (or rather, great great great great grandchild and great great great great grandfather)
      5. My g.g.g.g. grandparents were poor working class types and had absolutely fuck all to do with slavery. The same is true for almost all the taxpayers who would fund this nonsense

      The whole idea is ridiculous. Not one person alive today had ANYTHING to do with Africans being taken to the Americas as slaves. It sucks that it happened but it’s nothing to do with any of us

      If they wanna sue the wealthy direct descendants of slaveowners for damages then that’s for the courts to decide, but even that’s tenuous as shit

    36. The biggest slaveowners are in Africa. And I can make a compelling case that Perfect China runs on human slavery.

    37. TheFinalPieceOfPie on

      People point to the UK as assume the only thing we did is engage in the slave trade, but we also ended it and have been making up for it since. Reparation aren’t going to undo the harm or damage done and it also doesn’t acknowledge how Africa itself took part in the slave trade. Also I’m assuming this doesn’t cover the middle eastern slave trade either.

      I’m saying this as a mixed raced man, the people who are my neighbour and friends did not engage in the slave trade and whilst my family has dealt with racism and other hardships, this isn’t about the suffering of people affected by the trade, this is about lining another countries pockets to take advantage of that pain felt.

    38. lostchild69 on

      So countries that started the slave trade want money from the country that ended it. By doing so everyone in Britain would be poorer, including those descended from black and Asian families. The past has nothing to do with people alive today.

    39. Countries that started the slave trade want money from the country that ended it.

      Other countries are starting to smell our suicidal empathy and are trying to take advantage of it.

    40. Indiana_harris on

      Ah yes the very carefully curated Vote that ignores and dismisses all kinds of slavery except the transatlantic slave trade in a rather transparent bid to extort even more money from the Western world.

      No mention of their own governments/rulers/tribal chiefs who endorsed it and supported it wholesale from the African side, no mention of the far longer and more prevalent Arab-African slave trade, no mention of the large scale enslavement of Eastern Europeans by the Ottoman and Arab nations, numbering in the millions, and where we even get the word slave from.

    41. It was an international market where people in Africa also profited from kidnapping and stealing prospective slaves. Let’s not pretend it was just some random white dude in the UK who orchestrated and made money from this.

      That being said it was abhorrent. Just like Roman slavery was, or viking slavery, or modern day slavery in the middle east. If we acknowledge all of it then surely the UK should be seeking repatriation from Italy and the Nordic countries no? Why does it only go back 300 years? Who set the mark for repatriations statute of limitations? And what about Egyptian slaves? Greek slaves? The eunuchs of Asia? Where does one place the financial compensation amount and to whom do they pay?

    42. I think genocide – by its very name and nature – is the gravest crime against humanity. Slavery is like 7th. Which is awful but not 1st place awful.

    43. brainburger on

      The UK and USA never vote against each other in the UN, as part of our special relationship.

    44. ChangingMonkfish on

      Personally I think it’s stupid to try and rank these things as worse than one another.

      Firstly, trans-Atlantic slavery (or Western enslavement of Africans) wasn’t the only form of slavery. And there are all sorts of other crimes against humanity, like genocide for a start (Rwandan genocide, the Holocaust etc.). It’s ridiculous to try and “rank” these things and have one at the top as being the worst that’s ever happened. They’re all equally bad and we should all want to avoid them ever happening again.

      The purpose of the vote is to increase pressure on Western countries, including Britain, to pay reparations so it’s obvious the UK would abstain from it because it’s clearly partly targeted at the UK, and voting in favour would presumably undermine any legal defence we may end up having to deploy.

      So yeah, I’m actually all for us abstaining on this one, no one crime against humanity is “the gravest”, all crimes against humanity are just that and having some sort of “league table” of which ones were worse than others is just ridiculous.

    45. Shadowholme on

      Britain only paid off the loans we took out to STOP the slave trade in 2015. We have also spent tens of billions in aid to Africa over the decades.

      We have MORE than paid off our ‚debt‘ in that time. If that money didn’t get to the people who needed it – that’s not on us!

    Leave A Reply