Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Bluesky Threads Der Oberste Gerichtshof entscheidet, dass ISPs nicht für unbeabsichtigte Benutzerpiraterie haften https://www.techspot.com/news/111832-supreme-court-rules-isps-arent-liable-user-piracy.html
reddittorbrigade on 26.03.2026 12:07 p.m. In this world, nothing can be said to be certain, except death ,taxes and piracy.
aredd007 on 26.03.2026 12:14 p.m. Logic says ISPs shouldn’t be able to charge for prioritizing content if they have no responsibility in what customers do with the service.
Black_Otter on 26.03.2026 1:06 p.m. Dodge isn’t responsible when you use a Charger as a get away car and Glock isn’t responsible when you shoot that guard that tries to stop you. *edit* Hell the internet is more the road you drive on so is the state liable because you used their roads to commit crimes?
Altruistic-Horror343 on 26.03.2026 1:10 p.m. this is a good sign of a civil libertarian bent in SCOTUS. good sign for the inevitable constitutional challenge to age verification laws.
I_like_Mashroms on 26.03.2026 1:31 p.m. And car manufacturers aren’t guilty if someone uses their car to commit a vehicular crime. But yes let’s send basic ass logical questions to the SC.
Luke95gamer on 26.03.2026 1:37 p.m. I see this as a possible interpretation of protecting section 230
condoulo on 26.03.2026 1:43 p.m. Given that the lawsuit was led by Sony I love that a previous case involving Betamax was used as precedent for this ruling.
10 Kommentare
In this world, nothing can be said to be certain, except death ,taxes and piracy.
Ill take this as a win
Logic says ISPs shouldn’t be able to charge for prioritizing content if they have no responsibility in what customers do with the service.
Dodge isn’t responsible when you use a Charger as a get away car and Glock isn’t responsible when you shoot that guard that tries to stop you.
*edit* Hell the internet is more the road you drive on so is the state liable because you used their roads to commit crimes?
this is a good sign of a civil libertarian bent in SCOTUS. good sign for the inevitable constitutional challenge to age verification laws.
The pirate community gets a win?
Section 230 Win
And car manufacturers aren’t guilty if someone uses their car to commit a vehicular crime.
But yes let’s send basic ass logical questions to the SC.
I see this as a possible interpretation of protecting section 230
Given that the lawsuit was led by Sony I love that a previous case involving Betamax was used as precedent for this ruling.