Share.

    26 Kommentare

    1. ABoutDeSouffle on

      >Britain will not be able to meet its Nato commitments next month because it does not have any available warships in what has been branded a “national embarrassment”.

      >Ministers have had to turn to Germany to help fill the void left by the Royal Navy to meet its obligations in the Atlantic Ocean and Baltic Sea in April.

      >Sources told The i Paper that the UK will still be in command of the task force, but will be doing so **from the German flagship**.

      Heh 🙂

      No idea if it’s sensationalism and tbh. it’s great to have fallbacks in European NATO. Also, I have no idea how we have enough ships for that.

    2. PoliticsIsDepressing on

      If a certain someone in WWII read this headline they’d be over the moon.

    3. Obviously the low availability is a sucky point. It is quite frustrating to have the planned deployment scuppered by what are effectively political considerations rather than operational need, but there we go. Not the first nor the last time that such a thing will happen, and it’s good that Germany can step in to fill the gap.

    4. EvilFroeschken on

      Lol. Germany has like 10 frigates and 6 subs? Didn’t expect this would leave some to spare. I can remember the headlines when all 6 submarines were out of action for maintenance at the same time.

    5. The foreign policy makers have spread a declining Royal Navy too thinly to maintain the fig leaf of global capability – e.g. Freedom of navigation exercises in the Taiwan Strait, nuclear submarines in Australia etc – without adequately resourcing it. The military is run on a shoestring, there is no slack in the system.

    6. ok, but this means nothing unless the article also tells why:

      1) has UK decommissioned ships and not replace them historically
      2) it happens that they are under a maintenance cycle for short term
      3) they are deployed on extraordinary missions in the middle east / asia that where not foresaw at the moment of the nato commitment
      4) they have the ships but have personel shortages, etc?!

    7. Great british navy has fallen so far it has put officers in charge of german ships?

    8. AMeasuredBerserker on

      The state of the UK armed forces is shocking and truly makes you question where all the budget is being spent to receive so little from it.

    9. Adorable-Database187 on

      So allies working together to fill their capability gaps, how refreshing.
      Isnt this the whole point of being allies

    10. OkKnowledge2064 on

      if the german navy has to help you out youve hit rock bottom. Our navy really is useless

    11. CruxMajoris on

      UK is currently battling a good two decades of naval cuts, but is currently building up a larger number of replacement vessels so in the future things will be better.

      It takes time to fix the issues the Royal Navy is facing, and shipbuilding isn’t a quick and easy process.

    12. Legio-XIII-Gemina on

      Looks like the Anglo-German naval arms race has finally been settled.

    13. SnooDrawings6556 on

      The rum ration was canceled, they banned the lash and sodomy is generally accepted. The three things holding together the Royal Navy are gone

    14. PsychedelicAwakening on

      I’m sorry but if your ships weren’t ready for trump they weren’t ready for any war to begin with

    15. How can an island nation not have a navy in a high state of readiness?

      That would seem to throw away centuries of British strategic doctrine.

    Leave A Reply