Close Menu
    Technik

    Satya Nadella muss sich für „KI-Slop“ an den Streisand-Effekt erinnern

    Share.
    View 11 Comments

    11 Kommentare

    1. Franco1875 on

      >I take some solace in the fact that the same company quasi-demanding that the Copilot key on your keyboard be mandatory is entering the spring of their discontent.

      Do think the outburst from Nadella on slop was rich given the company has been at the forefront of the generative AI push over the last three years. They’re one of the big tech companies that’s directly responsible for this.

    2. gamersecret2 on

      Telling people to stop calling it “AI slop” is just going to make them say it louder.

      If Microsoft wants less backlash, ship less junk, show real ROI, and stop forcing AI everywhere.

    3. GroundbreakingMall54 on

      Nothing says „this label is accurate“ quite like the CEO of the company getting visibly upset about it. If it wasn’t slop, the word wouldn’t bother him.

    4. rnilf on

      > he said AI needed broader adoption because of a possible loss of “social permission” to use natural resources if it fails

      I don’t remember giving them permission to suck up all of our resources, poisoning our air and water, just so they could generate slop.

      Do you?

    5. AbsolutelyNotAPossum on

      Nah, he can get as frothy and bothered about it as he wants, and die mad about it.

    6. Random on

      Yes, and we also remember the Ponzi scheme for what the AI business right now really is.

    7. PizzaWall on

      The more AI is forced on me, the more I want nothing to do with it because in so many ways it’s not useful. It is frequelty inaccurate, It can’t innovate, it can’t dream up new ideas, it cannot even pronounce dates or common words correctly in AI slop videos. I know it’s AI when it pronounces 2026 as two thousand, two hundred, twentysix.

      I have to agree with Steve Wozniak on AI:

      >“I’ll ask a question where one word is the key item, the direction I want to go, and AI will come back with a whole bunch of clear explanations that are on the subject, but not what I really was interested in,“ he said. He also suggested the text it produces is „too perfect“ and „dry.“ Ultimately, he wants something more human, he said.

      >Eventually, AI might [replace white-collar jobs](https://www.pcmag.com/news/anthropic-ceo-ai-poised-to-wipe-out-50-of-entry-level-jobs-in-next-5-years), Woz conceded, but we’re not there yet. „[We don’t] understand well enough how the brain works to get to that point that it replaces the human; has emotions; cares about things; wants to help others; wants to be a good person.“

    8. ClovieKay on

      Okay… let me be the devils advocate here regardless of down votes… AI CAN be used in a good way. It can fast track a lot of processes that we do (IE see how people edited movies in the 1970s and be thankful we don’t have to do that anymore.) The technology CAN help.

      The way it’s being used as of this moment is AI slop though. They want to basically push out movies in a day, make brainrot videos and just only care about your views and not their vision… which is the bad thing we don’t want. It’s basically a “do it as easy and cheaply as possible” button that CEOs want to force you to like. No. Do something else with it. Expand the tech. Don’t try to maximize profits with it cause, as we see it might work in the short term, but definitely won’t in the long term.

    9. SingLyricsWithMe on

      Satya needs another 10 million dollar bonus for every 40,000 workers he lays off.

    Leave A Reply