Why did they send out the treasury secretary to say this instead of someone from the newly renamed „Department of War“?
ReactionJifs on
huge Michael Scott vibes
Great-Hotel-7820 on
Fuck this stupid asshole and anyone who supports this regime of pedophile sycophants.
glassFractals on
Because the Treasury Sec. is an expert on war or diplomacy? These are not serious people.
hjadams123 on
I am convinced this guy is a robot.
greenoctopus33 on
Is it not a war crime if power plants are attacked?
GalaideCrew on
you have to screw to remain a virgin
BernardMatthewsNorf on
And sometimes you have no fucking idea what you’re doing.
SilentWay8474 on
Oh son of a bitch these dipshits are dredging up Vietnam War fallacies
fungobat on
This isn’t fucking acne medicine, you fucking piece of shit.
brickyardjimmy on
Why is a TREASURY secretary saying ANYTHING about international relations or wars or anything that isn’t about the treasury?
MentokGL on
Sometimes you need to worship a pedophile to protect children
Bishopjones2112 on
I’m not American, can someone explain to me why the secretary of the treasury is talking about war? Seriously this guy should be talking about money, not justification of actions or war. Am I wrong or what.
BoosterRead78 on
They are all sociopaths.
johnnycyberpunk on
No guys, he means like “You have to make something wet to dry it off”, you can’t *dry it* if it’s already dry. Has to get wet first.
So he’s saying that the US has to make things absolutely horribly shitty (‘escalate’) in order to fix it (‘de-escalate’).
Basically what we’ve already known – that MAGA creates problems then claims victory when they ‘solve’ it.
simple123mind on
That’s Russian doctrine
PepperMill_NA on
Sometimes you have to sling bullshit when you have not actual reasoning for your actions.
2Dumb4GalacticEmpire on
Sometimes you have to vote to stop crazy people from getting into the White House
porican on
imagine saying this out loud where other people could hear it
AdHopeful3801 on
“We determined it was necessary to destroy the village in order to save the village.”
Rush_Banana on
Ah yes the guy who thinks the average „mom and pop“ investor has 10 or 12 houses in their property portfolio.
Brusion on
They really don’t know what they are doing.
Hilda_aka_Math on
sounds like something an abusive husband would say.
Splurch on
The doublespeak is getting lazy and self evident.
BrofessorFarnsworth on
Send his bitch ass to the front line then and see if he keeps his bullshit confidence
wolf_of_mainst99 on
The same idiot that doesn’t understand when to use a tariff
SneakyMamba007 on
Why do we keep getting interview sound bites from the TREASURY Secretary about the war? What am I missing?
Multidream on
Actual russian expression. They are doing this on orders of the kremlin to spike gas prices
TheReluctantSojourn on
“We had to destroy the village in order to save it.”
— 1968, Tet Offensive. Unidentified US Army officer to Peter Arnett after the destruction of Ben Tre resulting in ~ 1000 civilian deaths.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
29 Kommentare
Why did they send out the treasury secretary to say this instead of someone from the newly renamed „Department of War“?
huge Michael Scott vibes
Fuck this stupid asshole and anyone who supports this regime of pedophile sycophants.
Because the Treasury Sec. is an expert on war or diplomacy? These are not serious people.
I am convinced this guy is a robot.
Is it not a war crime if power plants are attacked?
you have to screw to remain a virgin
And sometimes you have no fucking idea what you’re doing.
Oh son of a bitch these dipshits are dredging up Vietnam War fallacies
This isn’t fucking acne medicine, you fucking piece of shit.
Why is a TREASURY secretary saying ANYTHING about international relations or wars or anything that isn’t about the treasury?
Sometimes you need to worship a pedophile to protect children
I’m not American, can someone explain to me why the secretary of the treasury is talking about war? Seriously this guy should be talking about money, not justification of actions or war. Am I wrong or what.
They are all sociopaths.
No guys, he means like “You have to make something wet to dry it off”, you can’t *dry it* if it’s already dry. Has to get wet first.
So he’s saying that the US has to make things absolutely horribly shitty (‘escalate’) in order to fix it (‘de-escalate’).
Basically what we’ve already known – that MAGA creates problems then claims victory when they ‘solve’ it.
That’s Russian doctrine
Sometimes you have to sling bullshit when you have not actual reasoning for your actions.
Sometimes you have to vote to stop crazy people from getting into the White House
imagine saying this out loud where other people could hear it
“We determined it was necessary to destroy the village in order to save the village.”
Ah yes the guy who thinks the average „mom and pop“ investor has 10 or 12 houses in their property portfolio.
They really don’t know what they are doing.
sounds like something an abusive husband would say.
The doublespeak is getting lazy and self evident.
Send his bitch ass to the front line then and see if he keeps his bullshit confidence
The same idiot that doesn’t understand when to use a tariff
Why do we keep getting interview sound bites from the TREASURY Secretary about the war? What am I missing?
Actual russian expression. They are doing this on orders of the kremlin to spike gas prices
“We had to destroy the village in order to save it.”
— 1968, Tet Offensive. Unidentified US Army officer to Peter Arnett after the destruction of Ben Tre resulting in ~ 1000 civilian deaths.