Close Menu
    Karten

    Akzeptieren Sie, dass dieser Teil Kasachstans ein Teil Europas ist?

    Share.
    View 36 Comments

    36 Kommentare

    1. Larrical_Larry on

      Well, Europe is more of a cultural & historical concept rather than a geographical one, but yeah, that tiny beat west of the Urals is inside of ‚geographical Europe‘.

      Geographically yes, not culturally.

    2. ZnarfGnirpslla on

      I just don’t really care to be honest and I am confused that so many people do care so much about what’s Europe and what isn’t.

    4. Aggravating-Lab-7831 on

      I’m more inclined to call Russia, Turkey, the South Caucasus and Kazakhstan just „Eurasian“ countries.

      Eurasian countries west of Russia are „European“ and southern Eurasian countries are „Asian“.

    5. Cefalopodul on

      It is a part of Europe, there is nothing to accept about it.

      The border of Europe are the Ural Mountains and Ural River

    6. Purple_Topic_1459 on

      I accept every division of Asia and Europe. It is just arbitrary. 

    7. CoryTrevor-NS on

      What is there to accept?

      If it’s in the European subcontinent by definition, then it’s a part of Europe. It doesn’t really affect anything in my life.

      People sometimes act like being considered European is a privilege or an honour.

    8. No_Gur_7422 on

      I think the Ural River–Ural Mountains makes a better boundary than the Emba River–Ural Mountains, but I also think the Caucasus watershed makes a better boundary than the Kuma–Manych Depression, even though the latter aligns better with the classical use of the Don River (Tanaïs) as the Europe–Asia boundary.

    11. Nal1999 on

      What do you mean „accept“?

      It’s literally part of Europe,the borders are pretty clearly made by the scientific community,why do I have the right to face an opinion?

    12. ReStury on

      It really depends on an answer to a important question: Do they get better ping playing on European servers or Asian? 😀

    17. Most-Celebration-394 on

      We should just get off the actual continents model and just say America, Africa, Eurasia, Antarctica and Oceania

    18. RoyBattysJacket on

      No, I do not.

      The relevant bodies can designate it as being geographically part of Europe all they want.

    19. Skexy8 on

      I’d much rather consider Georgia to be part of Europe than that Western section of Kazakhstan, but geographically speaking, yes. Culturally, absolutely not though.

    22. goteamnick on

      Sure, why not. Why is it a point of contention? The division between Europe and Asia is pretty arbitrary.

    25. Xaphan26 on

      Sure because that line is an extension of the Ural Mountains which traditionally formed the Europe/Asia border. The Caucasus mountains are another continent defining border.

    29. THE_ATOMIX_ on

      Europe as a cultural group of nations has always been a divisive topic and the definition of what is considered European or not has changed a lot over the centuries. Personally I wouldn’t consider Kazakhstan as European.

    32. Johnny_Monkee on

      I used to live in Europe and work in Asia when I was in KZ. Had to cross the Ural river to get to work.

      I also think that the OP’s map does not follow the Ural river correctly – the land shaded dark blue should go a bit further East.

    Leave A Reply