Is this a long exposure photo? If so it’s a bug flying by
Fomdoo on
You should clean your mousepad.
Waddensky on
Camera movement. If you look closely, you’ll notice that all stars have this squiggle.
sithelephant on
One very bright star, and something banged the camera while the shutter was open.
If I was more energetic, I would investigate if there is a very bright star in the middle that is consistent with this.
thefooleryoftom on
Camera movement during the long exposure.
farganbastige on
How long was the exposure? It’s weird how there are star trails in some parts of the frame but not all over.
Fueled_by_sugar on
well, what this **could** be really depends on whether this is the universe or a uterus
NoSource866 on
Dis dih 🥀 ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀
Xypher169 on
Alien: “shit I left my sunglasses at home”
Starts to turn ship around
“Oh, nvm here they are”
Back on course
adymann on
Yeah, you kicked the tripod.
missdawg420 on
Yeah I get the camera movement explanation, but what’s throwing me is that the other stars have short, consistent trails. this one has a completely different motion pattern and brightness. If it was just shake during exposure, wouldn’t all the stars show a similar squiggle rather than one isolated path like that?
RO3C on
That’s our new Petrova Line
TheCeruleanFire on
That’s the infamous constellation “Jazz Hands” obviously
Important_Morning565 on
Space Pubes!
Or a Tapeworm.
Viceroy_95 on
I caught a picture of Sirius on my Nikon last night and the image ended up resembling the letter ‚b‘ with multiple bright spots. I’m new to photography so I didn’t realize I had to hold absolutely still while that zoomed, I ended up resting my camera on a desk but it was still shaky, if I can manage a steady shot I think the resulting quality will be telescope-like and really clear.
BeebleBoxn on
Looks like a squiggle from Camera shake. Some Cameras you can select focal points. When people say the stars have the same exposure movement some are traveling down but for other stars they are traveling across.
Wild_Penguin82 on
You’ve rotated and bumped the camera (phone). My best bet is that „squiggle“ is Canopus, a -0.6m star. I found out this with the help of the link posted to astrometry.net elsewhere in the comments.
Another option is it’s a drone, there are hobbyist everywhere flying those things. But I’d still claim it’s Canopus.
BakerOne on
A Frenchman posting his jogging achievements when he shouldn’t.
justduett on
Drunk driver in a UFO.
DivusSentinal on
String theory waiting around till it gets proven
brealio on
Looks like a big…………………………….
GrandPriapus on
It’s camera movement. It is always camera movement. If the shutter was open for five seconds, and the camera was moving for the first two seconds, this would be the result.
illuminaughty1973 on
Space eel.
Seems.obvious.
OreoSpeedwaggon on
Sophons from Trisolaris trying to draw the „Super S“ sketch.
varignet on
my guess is that the camera moving/tiling and the squiggle is a satellite
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
25 Kommentare
Is this a long exposure photo? If so it’s a bug flying by
You should clean your mousepad.
Camera movement. If you look closely, you’ll notice that all stars have this squiggle.
One very bright star, and something banged the camera while the shutter was open.
If I was more energetic, I would investigate if there is a very bright star in the middle that is consistent with this.
Camera movement during the long exposure.
How long was the exposure? It’s weird how there are star trails in some parts of the frame but not all over.
well, what this **could** be really depends on whether this is the universe or a uterus
Dis dih 🥀 ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀
Alien: “shit I left my sunglasses at home”
Starts to turn ship around
“Oh, nvm here they are”
Back on course
Yeah, you kicked the tripod.
Yeah I get the camera movement explanation, but what’s throwing me is that the other stars have short, consistent trails. this one has a completely different motion pattern and brightness. If it was just shake during exposure, wouldn’t all the stars show a similar squiggle rather than one isolated path like that?
That’s our new Petrova Line
That’s the infamous constellation “Jazz Hands” obviously
Space Pubes!
Or a Tapeworm.
I caught a picture of Sirius on my Nikon last night and the image ended up resembling the letter ‚b‘ with multiple bright spots. I’m new to photography so I didn’t realize I had to hold absolutely still while that zoomed, I ended up resting my camera on a desk but it was still shaky, if I can manage a steady shot I think the resulting quality will be telescope-like and really clear.
Looks like a squiggle from Camera shake. Some Cameras you can select focal points. When people say the stars have the same exposure movement some are traveling down but for other stars they are traveling across.
You’ve rotated and bumped the camera (phone). My best bet is that „squiggle“ is Canopus, a -0.6m star. I found out this with the help of the link posted to astrometry.net elsewhere in the comments.
Another option is it’s a drone, there are hobbyist everywhere flying those things. But I’d still claim it’s Canopus.
A Frenchman posting his jogging achievements when he shouldn’t.
Drunk driver in a UFO.
String theory waiting around till it gets proven
Looks like a big…………………………….
It’s camera movement. It is always camera movement. If the shutter was open for five seconds, and the camera was moving for the first two seconds, this would be the result.
Space eel.
Seems.obvious.
Sophons from Trisolaris trying to draw the „Super S“ sketch.
my guess is that the camera moving/tiling and the squiggle is a satellite