Lets all be broke looking at the grey sky polluted by other nations
Bubbafett33 on
They….needed a study for this?
Seriously, some scholarly dude pronounced “if we produced and sold more of what is, by far, our largest export, it could very well positively impact our GDP”…
MicrosoftPaintRules on
No way?
Feynyx-77-CDN on
Yes. And destroy our planet long term….. keep it in the ground
Hurtin-Albertn on
Go figure! The Liberals and their media extension are acting like they’ve just had an epiphany on how to save this country. Except it’s the common sense approach that they’ve had their back turned to for the past 15 years. Are they admitting their fault by sending word to the press to start shifting the tide on public perception? What happened to their climate grandstanding? They can only afford to virtue signal until they realize we’re headed for a cliff, then they need to backtrack. Now they have to admit they were mistaken in shuttering Canada’s oil development, or admit that „climate change“ only matters until the money runs out.
Falcon674DR on
Who is going to pay for it. All of it.
5hadow on
Well thank fuck there was a study done on this. How else would we know this?
Friendly-Pop-3757 on
Wonder how many consultants they had to hire to figure that out?
NewRedditUser89757 on
In another word, study found water is wet 🙂
Spsurgeon on
Definitely NOT a study paid for by the Oil lobby…
Spastic_Turkey98 on
And how much did this study cost the taxpayer?
OptiPath on
Thank you. Captain obvious
MRobi83 on
Whaaaat? No waaaay!
JadeLens on
Boosting a bunch of different industries and not putting all of our eggs in one basket would probably boost GDP more.
Mindless_Engine_4494 on
How do I get the job doing these studies. Yes water is wet… No please pay me lots of money.
Cokeinmynostrel on
Lucky they found it while searching for things that make us money, what a needle in a haystack!
SasquatchBlumpkins on
And in further news every 60 seconds in Africa a minute passes.
Smackolol on
Holy fucking big brain study here 🤯
Zraknul on
If we ramped up production we could sell more units of product.
The--Majestic--Goose on
So would boosting manufacturing or plenty of other sectors.
Fossil fuels are contributing to climate change, which makes everyone’s life more expensive and less livable. I’m tired of oil and gas being touted as a magic solution for the economy.
legardeur2 on
We’ve known this for decades.
Main_Association_568 on
Wouldn’t boosting production of anything improve gdp and jobs?
Altruistic_Ad_0 on
Isn’t that the friggin point of having oil?
Dry_System9339 on
Even the UCP know this
infamousal on
wow shocking.
MinuteCampaign7843 on
What about the carbon neutral green energy utopia and Carneys book?
shakesy on
Yeah so could building renewable energy infrastructure
prsnep on
Doing anything would increase GDP. Why does that need to be said? GDP measures how much stuff is being done for which transactions need money.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
32 Kommentare
Fork found in kitchen.
Ya think. Doesn’t take a genius to figure this out
Liberals create an economic mess just to pose now as saviours and people love it.
Do we really need “study” to tell us that… lol.
Liberals crying hurting environment. Climate change.
Lets all be broke looking at the grey sky polluted by other nations
They….needed a study for this?
Seriously, some scholarly dude pronounced “if we produced and sold more of what is, by far, our largest export, it could very well positively impact our GDP”…
No way?
Yes. And destroy our planet long term….. keep it in the ground
Go figure! The Liberals and their media extension are acting like they’ve just had an epiphany on how to save this country. Except it’s the common sense approach that they’ve had their back turned to for the past 15 years. Are they admitting their fault by sending word to the press to start shifting the tide on public perception? What happened to their climate grandstanding? They can only afford to virtue signal until they realize we’re headed for a cliff, then they need to backtrack. Now they have to admit they were mistaken in shuttering Canada’s oil development, or admit that „climate change“ only matters until the money runs out.
Who is going to pay for it. All of it.
Well thank fuck there was a study done on this. How else would we know this?
Wonder how many consultants they had to hire to figure that out?
In another word, study found water is wet 🙂
Definitely NOT a study paid for by the Oil lobby…
And how much did this study cost the taxpayer?
Thank you. Captain obvious
Whaaaat? No waaaay!
Boosting a bunch of different industries and not putting all of our eggs in one basket would probably boost GDP more.
How do I get the job doing these studies. Yes water is wet… No please pay me lots of money.
Lucky they found it while searching for things that make us money, what a needle in a haystack!
And in further news every 60 seconds in Africa a minute passes.
Holy fucking big brain study here 🤯
If we ramped up production we could sell more units of product.
So would boosting manufacturing or plenty of other sectors.
[In the last ten years oil and gas production, exports and profits have increased significantly, reaching all time highs](https://www.statcan.gc.ca/o1/en/plus/7940-another-record-year-canadian-crude-oil-crude-oil-year-review-2024). [What hasn’t increased are the jobs](https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/250902/dq250902a-eng.htm). Oil and gas is not a silver bullet fix for the economy. Oil and gas and mining combined employs about 1/7th as many people as manufacturing does.
Fossil fuels are contributing to climate change, which makes everyone’s life more expensive and less livable. I’m tired of oil and gas being touted as a magic solution for the economy.
We’ve known this for decades.
Wouldn’t boosting production of anything improve gdp and jobs?
Isn’t that the friggin point of having oil?
Even the UCP know this
wow shocking.
What about the carbon neutral green energy utopia and Carneys book?
Yeah so could building renewable energy infrastructure
Doing anything would increase GDP. Why does that need to be said? GDP measures how much stuff is being done for which transactions need money.