Share.

    18 Kommentare

    1. SurePrize6218 on

      Without a doubt much more impressive than the entirety of operation Epstein

    2. deltarogueO8 on

      For those who believe this is real, I have some beachfront property in Nevada that you might be interested in.

    3. overratedcucumber on

      The size of that explosion would not have left a completely in-tact f35 silhouette on the other end. I’m not saying Iran didn’t hit a 35, I’m saying this video looks very fake based on every other video I have ever seen of a aircraft getting hit by a missile (including aircraft that rain airport after).

    4. The video is fake just like most (but not all) of the war is fake. The Trump Administration doesn’t bother calling it out because they’re cooperating with elements of Iranian leadership to stage this whole thing. Everybody gets to tell whatever lies they like in order to achieve the goals.

      Every single thing about the report is vague and indeterminate. What got me, though, is: why doesn’t the video cut off right after the strike? Seems like examining the damage would be the most interesting part. Also the hardest to fake.

    5. Intothewasteland on

      Was this with Russian tech? Wondering if Russia is using Iran to test against USA

    6. yellowjackethokie on

      Well, now we know why the US hasn’t employed the GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) in Iran, yet. Because it has to be dropped by the MC-130 and if they can hit our F-35s they can certainly hit our MC-130s. This likely signals that the airspace is not nearly as safe for US aircraft as the administration has been leading people to assume.

    7. Why did the jet have a heat signature and then subsequently lose that heat signature

    Leave A Reply